| Citation: | Liu Wei, Duan Jiawen, Zhao Ruichao, Wang Yi′an, Li Yin, Chen Wei, Li Qiuhua, Zhou Hong, Anton Brancelj. Distribution of aquatic fauna in karstic groundwater and its enviro-nmental response on the south bank of the Yangtze River in Yichang[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 273-282. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0218
|
To understand the distribution of aquatic fauna in karst groundwater and its environmental response, aquatic fauna and water samples were collected from 15 epikarst springs and 9 large karst springs on the south bank of the Yangtze River in Yichang from July to August 2018. In total, 809 individuals were collected, and they belonged to 13 subclasses. We found that: ①The spatial distribution of different animals in groundwater was different. Copepoda and Ostracoda stygobionts were abundant in epikarst springs (31.3%, 23.7%), Trichoptera and Diptera were less abundant (0.4%, 2.9%). Copepoda and Amphipoda were abundant in large springs (25.0%, 8.3%), Ostracoda stygobionts were less abundant (2.2%). ②The variation range of environmental factors (pH, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+) in large karst springs (0.64, 1.25 mg/L, 34.0 mg/L, 22.1 mg/L) was narrower than that in epikarst springs (2.45, 5.68 mg/L, 59.6 mg/L, 33.4 mg/L), which indicated a relatively stable condition. ③According to the stepwise regression analysis, the main environmental factors of epikarst springs were pH, Na+ and Mg2+, and the main environmental factors of large karst springs were pH, SO42- and Mg2+. Moreover, the representative biological communities of epikarst springs were Ostracoda, Diptera and dark layer species of Turbellaria, and the representative biological communities of large karst springs were Mollusca, Diptera and Decapoda. ④According to the path analysis, Diptera mainly responded indirectly to Na+ and Mg2+ through Ostracoda, and Ostracoda stygobionts, Diptera and Turbellaria responded directly to pH in epikarst springs. In large karst springs, Mollusca mainly indirectly responded to pH through Diptera, Diptera indirectly responded to SO42- through Decapoda, and Mollusca, Diptera and Decapoda directly responded to Mg2+. The distribution of fauna in groundwater was the result of a direct response to environmental factors and an indirect response between different species.
| [1] |
靖娟利, 陈植华, 胡成, 等. 中国西南部岩溶山区生态环境脆弱性评价[J]. 地质科技情报, 2003, 32(3): 95-99, 108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200303019.htm
Jing J L, Chen Z H, Hu C, et al. Study on eco-environment fragile evaluation of karst mountains in Southwest China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2003, 32(3): 95-99, 108 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200303019.htm
|
| [2] |
郭芳. 岩溶洞穴交互带的环境功能特征及形成机制[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
Guo F. The characteristics of environment function and formation mechanism of cave hyporheic zone in karst water system[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
|
| [3] |
陈静, 罗明明, 廖春来, 等. 中国岩溶湿地生态水文过程研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(6): 221-230. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201906027.htm
Chen J, Luo M M, Liao C L, et al. Review of eco-hydrological process in karst wetlands of China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(6): 221-230 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201906027.htm
|
| [4] |
Yan Z, Li W, Shen T, et al. Aquatic microalgal and bacterial communities in a karst wetland watershed[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 591: 125573. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125573
|
| [5] |
D'Souza A M, Gauns M. Spatial variability of copepod species distribution in the eastern Arabian Sea in pre-monsoon conditions[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 2018, 156: 111-120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967064517301777
|
| [6] |
赵红亮, 郭芳, 刘绍华. 灵水岩溶泉浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的指示作用[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(4): 484-491. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201704009.htm
Zhao H L, Guo F, Liu S H: Structure of phytoplankton community at the Lingshui karst spring and its implications for water environment[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(4): 484-491 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201704009.htm
|
| [7] |
赵红亮. 武鸣盆地岩溶泉内浮游生物群落结构及其环境指示作用研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2017.
Zhao H L. Study on the structure of plankton community andits environmental indicators of karst spring in Wuming Basin[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).
|
| [8] |
Liu W, Zhou C Y, Julia E B, et al. The effect of hydrological and hydrochemical parameters on the micro-distribution of aquatic fauna in drip water in the Velika Pasica Cave, Central Slovenia[J]. Ecohydrology. 2017, 10: e1835. doi: 10.1002/eco.1835
|
| [9] |
刘伟, 周翠英, 袁爱华, 等. 岩溶表层带水生动物研究进展[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(6): 712-719. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201606015.htm
Liu W, Zhou C Y, Yuan A H, et al. Progress of research on aquatic fauna in epikarst[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(6): 712-719 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201606015.htm
|
| [10] |
罗健. 典型表层岩溶泉域水化学特征环境敏感性及其碳汇效应: 以重庆金佛山水房泉流域为例[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013.
Luo J. Study on environmental susceptivity of hydrochemical variations and carbon sink effect in the typical epikarst spring: A case of Shuifang Spring area in Jinfo Mountain in Chongqing, China[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract).
|
| [11] |
韦丽琼, 郭芳, 姜光辉. 广西武鸣盆地岩溶泉口浮游生物群落对水环境变化的响应[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 33(3): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FLKX202203007.htm
Wei L Q, Guo F, Jiang G H. Responses of plankton community to water Environment changes in karst springs in Wuming Basin, Guangxi Province[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022, 33(3): 1-15 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FLKX202203007.htm
|
| [12] |
Mori N, Debeljak B, Škerjanec M, et al. Modelling the effects of multiple stressors on respiration and microbial biomass in the hyporheic zone using decision trees[J]. Water Research, 2019, 149: 9-20.
|
| [13] |
刘伟, 周宏, 柯怡兵, 等. 岩溶表层带水生动物微分布规律及水文环境影响: 以Velika Pasica溶洞为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(4): 563-571. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201704019.htm
Liu W, Zhou H, Ke Y B, et al. Micro-distribution of epikarstic aquifer fauna and its hydrological interpretation: A case study of Velika Pasica Cave in Slovenia[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(4): 563-571(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201704019.htm
|
| [14] |
吕保义, 谢建云, 郑喻, 等. 稀土尾矿库周边地下水微生物的群落多样性研究[J]. 环境工程: 2015, 33(增刊1): 101-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJGC2015S1024.htm
Lü B Y, Xie J Y, Zheng Y, et al. Study on microbial biodiversity in the groundwater around tailings of rare earth[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2015, 33(S1): 101-116 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJGC2015S1024.htm
|
| [15] |
朱玉, 王德利, 钟志伟. 生态系统基于性状调节的物种间接作用: 特征、成因及后果[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(23): 7781-7790. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201723003.htm
Zhu Y, Wang D L, Zhong Z W: Characteristics, causes, and consequences of trait-mediated indirect interactions in eco-systems[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(23): 7781-7790 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB201723003.htm
|
| [16] |
沈嘉瑞. 中国动物志: 节肢动物门甲壳纲淡水桡足类[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
Shen J R. Faunasinica: Arthropoda crustacea freshwater copepoda[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1979 (in Chinese).
|
| [17] |
Hunt P V, Brian P V C, François D, et al. Trophic pathways of phytoplankton size classes through the zooplankton food web over the spring transition period in the North-West Mediterranean Sea[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017, 122(8): 6309-6324. doi: 10.1002/2016JC012658
|
| [18] |
Mori N, Brancelj A. Distribution and habitat preferences of species within the genus Elaphoidella Chappuis, 1929 (Crustacea: Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in Slovenia[J]. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 2007, 247(2): 85-94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044523108000065
|
| [19] |
Brancelj A, Žibrat U, Jamnik B. Differences between groundwater fauna in shallow and in deep intergranular aquifers as an indication of different characteristics of habitats and hydraulic connections[J]. Journal of Limnology, 2016, 75(2): 248-261.
|
| [20] |
Slabe M, Danevcic T, Hug K, et al. Key drivers of microbial abundance, activity, and diversity in karst spring waters across an altitudinal gradient in Slovenia[J]. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 2021, 86: 99-114.
|
| [21] |
Basu S, Gogoi P, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Variability in the zooplankton assemblages in relation to environmental variables in the tidal creeks of Sundarbans Estuarine System, India[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(30): 45981-46002.
|
| [22] |
Thomas B, Christopher S, Thomas J, et al. Aligning indicators of community composition and biogeochemical function in stream monitoring and ecological assessments[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60: 970-979. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X15004811
|
| [23] |
Larson D M, DeJong D, Anteau M J, et al. High abundance of a single taxon (amphipods) predicts aquatic macrophyte biodiversity in Prairie Wetlands[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2022, 31(3): 1073-1093.
|
| [24] |
Heneash A M, Alprol A E, El-Naggar H A, et al. Multivariate analysis of plankton variability and water pollution in two highly dynamic sites, southeastern Mediterranean (Egyptian Coast)[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15(4): 330-352.
|
| [25] |
Li Y, Geng M D, Yu J L, et al. Eutrophication decrease compositional dissimilarity in freshwater plankton communities[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 821: 153434.
|
| [26] |
Dza B, Mh B, Ac B, et al. Sulphate in freshwater ecosystems: A review of sources, biogeochemical cycles, ecotoxicological effects and bioremediation[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2020, 212: 103446.
|
| [27] |
Eysteinsson S T, Arason S, Gujónsdóttir M. Chemical characterization and processing suitability of zooplankton-rich side-streams from Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) processing[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2020, 89: 103471. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157519316242
|
| [28] |
Shaikhutdinov N, Gusev O. Chironomid midges (Diptera) provide insights into genome evolution in extreme environments[J]. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2022, 49: 101-107.
|
| [29] |
Ewald M L, Feminella J W, Lenertz K K, et al. Acutephysiological responses of the freshwater snail Elimia Flava (Mollusca: Pleuroceridae) to environmental pH and Calcium[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology: Toxicology & Pharmacology, 2009, 150(2): 237-245. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532045609001124
|
| [30] |
Qiang G, Liu J, Batzer D P, et al. Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) aspotential surrogates of overall aquatic invertebrate assemblage in Wetlands of Northeastern China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 90: 193-200. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X18300761
|
| [31] |
Carlos I, Julio P, Dario A. Selection of macroinvertebrate metrics for rapid assessment of the human impact by biotic conditions of Bolivian Altiplano streams[J]. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2022, 113(1): 103638. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0075951113000133
|
| [32] |
Leclercq-Dransart J, Demuynck S, Bidar G, et al. Does adding fly ash to metal-contaminated soils play a role in soil functionality regarding metal availability, litter quality, microbial activity and the community structure of Diptera larvae?[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 138(3): 99-111.
|
Copyright © 2010Editorial Department of Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
DownLoad:
