Reservoir characteristics and brittleness evaluation of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale in Yichang area, Western Hubei Province
-
摘要: 依据鄂西宜昌地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩X射线衍射全岩分析、X射线衍射黏土矿物分析、物性分析、含气性测试和地球物理测井等资料，对区内页岩储层发育特征和页岩脆性特征进行了研究和综合评价。结果表明：宜昌地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩依次主要由石英、黏土矿物、长石、白云石、方解石、黄铁矿等组成；具有自底部“高硅、低黏土”页岩向上过渡为“低硅、高黏土”页岩的发育特征。页岩孔隙度主要为1.01%~1.77%，平均1.29%，渗透率主要为0.001×10-3~0.843×10-3 μm2，平均0.234×10-3 μm2，属于低孔特低渗储层；五峰组-龙马溪组下部页岩含气量普遍大于1 m3/t，厚度可达20 m。脆性矿物含量法脆性分析结果显示，页岩脆性指数分布于39.6%~89.6%之间，平均55.4%，其中底部10 m厚的页岩脆性指数均大于60%，利于储层压裂改造后形成复杂的裂缝网络系统。弹性参数法脆性分析结果显示，五峰组-龙马溪组页岩杨氏模量主要为25.2~67.5 GPa，平均38.9 GPa；泊松比主要为0.177~0.327，平均0.297；脆性指数主要介于8.5%~97.3%之间，平均33.2%；其中底部13 m厚的页岩具有典型高杨氏模量、低泊松比和高脆性指数的特征。页岩脆性综合评价结果表明，五峰组-龙马溪组底部9 m厚的页岩发育相对最优杨氏模量和泊松比条件，脆性属于中-高等程度，造缝能力强，可压裂性好。将页岩段划分为4类可改造储层，其中底部2 714.4~2 723.4 m段页岩具有泊松比相对最小、含气性最好、脆性最优和有机质含量高等特征，构成研究区最优改造层段。Abstract: Based on the data of X-ray diffraction (XRD) whole rock analysis, X-ray diffraction clay mineral analysis, physical analysis, gas-bearing test and geophysical logging of the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale in Yichang area, the development characteristics and brittleness characteristics of the shale reservoirs in the area are studied and evaluated comprehensively. The results show that the shale of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Yichang area is mainly composed of quartz, clay minerals, feldspar, dolomite, calcite and pyrite, and has the characteristics of high silica, and low clay in the bottom and low silica and high clay in the upper layer. The shale porosity mainly ranges from 1.01% to 1.77%, with an average of 1.29%, permeability mainly ranges from 0.001×10-3 μm2 to 0.843×10-3 μm2, average 0.234×10-3 μm2, belonging to low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir. The shale gas content in Lower Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation whose thickness can reach 20 m is generally greater than 1 m3/t. The results of brittleness analysis by brittle mineral content method show that the brittleness index of shale varies from 39.6% to 89.6%, with an average of 55.4%. The brittleness index of shale at the bottom of 10 m is more than 60%, which is beneficial to the formation of complex fracture network system after reservoir fracturing. The results of brittleness analysis by elastic parameter method show that the Young′s modulus of the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale is mainly between 25.2 GPa and 67.5 GPa, with an average of 38.9 GPa; the Poisson′s ratio is mainly between 0.177 and 0.327, with an average of 0.297, and the brittleness index is mainly between 8.5% and 97.3%, with an average of 33.2%. The 13 m shale at the bottom has typical high Young′s modulus, low Poisson′s ratio and high brittleness index. The comprehensive evaluation results of shale brittleness indicate that the 9 m shale of the bottom of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation has the relative optimum Young′s modulus and Poisson′s ratio. Its brittleness belongs to medium and high degree. The 9 m shale has strong fracture making ability and good fracturing ability. The whole shale is divided into 4 sections of modifiable reservoir. The shale section of 2 714.4-2 723.4 m at the bottom has the characteristics of relatively minimum Poisson′s ratio, best gas content, best brittleness and high organic matter content, which constitutes the optimal reconstruction section in the study area.
-
图 1 五峰组-龙马溪组岩石矿物组分特征
a.全岩X射线衍射组分及质量分数；b.黏土矿物X射线衍射组分及占比
Figure 1. Characteristics of mineral composition of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation
图 2 五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩石矿物组分垂向变化及含气性发育特征
Figure 2. Vertical variation of mineral composition and gas-bearing development characteristics of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation
图 3 五峰组-龙马溪组页岩物性发育特征
A.孔隙度分布直方图；B.渗透率分布直方图
Figure 3. Physical property development characteristics of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale
图 4 五峰组-龙马溪组页岩脆性发育特征
Figure 4. Characteristics of brittleness of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale
图 5 五峰组-龙马溪组页岩矿物脆性指数BRIT与测井脆性指数BI相关图
Figure 5. Correlation diagram of the BRIT of mineral brittleness index and the BI of logging brittleness index for Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale
图 6 五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩石力学参数与脆性指数分布图
Figure 6. Distribution diagram of rock mechanics parameters and brittleness index for Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale
-
[1] Jarvie D M, Hill R J, Ruble T E, et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=a621eb0878a628d0bce992a113f87e18&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [2] Ross D J K, Bustin R M.Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian-Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary basin:Application of an integrated formation evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2008, 92(1):87-125. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=3998f24328916d789abfff22e71164f0&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [3] 邹才能, 董大忠, 杨桦, 等.中国页岩气形成条件及勘探实践[J].天然气工业, 2011, 31(12):26-39. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201112005 [4] 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰, 等.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf201202001 [5] 邱小松, 杨波, 胡明毅.中扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气储层及含气性特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6):1274-1283. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97226X/20136/48366844.html [6] 王涛利, 郝爱胜, 陈清, 等.中扬子宜昌地区五峰组和龙马溪组页岩发育主控因素[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5):616-631. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqdqkx201805003 [7] 苏文博, 何龙清, 王永标, 等.华南奥陶-志留系五峰组及龙马溪组底部斑脱岩与高分辨综合地层[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2002, 32(3):207-209. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkx-cd200203005 [8] 陈孝红, 张保民, 陈林, 等.鄂西宜昌地区晚奥陶世-早志留世页岩气藏的主控地质因素与富集模式[J].地球学报, 2018, 39(3):4-15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQXB201803001.htm [9] 邓铭哲, 何登发.当阳地区地质结构及其对宜昌地区志留系页岩气勘探的意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 45(4):487-500. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cdlgxyxb201804009 [10] 巩磊, 王超勇, 杨永国, 等.川西南与川东北地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件对比及目标区分析[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(5):128-133. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201405018 [11] 唐书恒, 范二平, 张松航, 等.湘西北下古生界海相页岩储层特征与含气性分析[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):135-146. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dxqy201602014 [12] 杨宇宁, 王剑, 郭秀梅, 等.渝东北田坝地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩矿物学特征及其油气地质意义[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(4):772-780. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cjxb201704011 [13] 董大忠, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 等.黑色页岩微裂缝发育控制因素:以长宁双河剖面五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):19-30. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201805002 [14] 赵瞻, 余谦, 周小琳, 等.重庆黔江地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气成藏条件[J].地质科技情报, 2017, 36(3):122-129. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201703016 [15] Gale J F W, Reed R M, Holder J.Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):603-622. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f75716f5dc74610df29f000c500e367b [16] 琚宜文, 卜红玲, 王国昌, 等.页岩气储层主要特征及其对储层改造的影响[J].地球科学进展, 2014, 29(4):492-506. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkxjz201404008 [17] 周雪晴, 张占松, 张超谟, 等.基于矿物组分和成岩作用的致密砂岩储层脆性评价方法:以鄂尔多斯盆地东北部某区块为例[J].油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(5):10-16. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90849A/20175/672727146.html [18] 杨建, 付永强, 陈鸿飞, 等.页岩储层的岩石力学特性[J].天然气工业, 2012, 32(7):12-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201207003 [19] 范卓颖, 林承焰, 王天祥, 等.致密地层岩石脆性指数的测井优化建模[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(11):1411-1420. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201511010 [20] 吴蓝宇, 胡东风, 陆永潮, 等.四川盆地涪陵气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩优势岩相[J].石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):189-197. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SKYK201602005.htm [21] 王宏语, 杨润泽, 张峰, 等.富含有机质泥页岩岩相表征的研究现状与趋势[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(2):141-148. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201802020 [22] Sondergeld C H, Newsham K E, Comisky J T, et al.Petrophysical considerations in evaluating and producing shale gas resources[C]//SPE unconventional gas conference.[S.l.]: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010: 1-34. [23] 余杰, 秦瑞宝, 刘春成, 等.页岩气储层测井评价与产量"甜点"识别:以美国鹰潭页岩气储层为例[J].中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(3):104-112. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=KTSY201703013 [24] 刘树根, 马文辛, 黄文明, 等.四川盆地东部地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(8):2239-2252. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201108003 [25] 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等.页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J].石油学报, 2014(1):184-196. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201401029 [26] 王超, 石万忠, 张晓明, 等.页岩储层裂缝系统综合评价及其对页岩气渗流和聚集的影响[J].油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(1):50-56. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yqdzycsl201701007 [27] 徐赣川, 钟光海, 谢冰, 等.基于岩石物理实验的页岩脆性测井评价方法[J].天然气工业, 2014, 34(12):38-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201412005 [28] 周雪晴, 张占松, 张超谟, 等.基于矿物组分和成岩作用的致密砂岩储层脆性评价方法:以鄂尔多斯盆地东北部某区块为例[J].油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(5):10-16. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201705002.htm [29] 秦晓艳, 王震亮, 于红岩, 等.基于岩石物理与矿物组成的页岩脆性评价新方法[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(10):1924-1932. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqdqkx201610018 [30] Gupta N, Rai C S, Sondergeld C H.Petrophysical characterization of the Woodford shale[J].Petrophysics, 2013, 54(4):368-382. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=f0cc81269ff13d63af13065cd00ac780&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [31] 汪忠浩, 陈嗣, 李厚霖, 等.泥页岩气层脆性特征的地球物理测井研究方法[J].工程地球物理学报, 2016, 13(1):7-13. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gcdqwlxb201601002 [32] Grieser W V, Bray J M.Identification of production potential in unconventional reservoirs[C]//Anon.Production and operations symposium.[S.l.]: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2007: 1-6. [33] 刁海燕.泥页岩储层岩石力学特性及脆性评价[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(9):344-350. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98201309027 [34] 王鹏万, 李昌, 张磊, 等.五峰组-龙马溪组储层特征及甜点层段评价:以昭通页岩气示范区A井为例[J].煤炭学报, 2017, 42(11):2925-2935. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-MTXB201711018.htm [35] 杨小兵, 张树东, 钟林, 等.复杂多矿物组分的页岩气储层横波时差预测方法[J].天然气工业, 2015, 35(3):36-41. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201503005 [36] Rickman R, Mullen M J, Petre J E, et al.A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale[C]//Anon.SPE annual technical conference and exhibition.[S.l.]: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008: 1-11. [37] 蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等.页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J].天然气工业, 2010, 30(10):7-12. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201010002 [38] 何建华, 丁文龙, 王哲, 等.页岩储层体积压裂缝网形成的主控因素及评价方法[J].地质科技情报, 2015, 34(4):108-118. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201504016 [39] 毕赫, 姜振学, 李鹏, 等.渝东南地区黔江凹陷五峰组-龙马溪组页岩储层特征及其对含气量的影响[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(8):1275-1283. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 530
- PDF下载量: 757
- 被引次数: 0
