Experimental study on the electrical resistivity characteristics of sand under different testing conditions
-
摘要:
砂土电阻率特性的室内试验研究成果被广泛用于野外高密度电法的成果解译中, 但测试条件的影响及电阻率与砂土特性关系曲线的野外应用需要进一步研究。为此研制了室内二电极电阻率测试装置, 以分析电流类型、交流电频率和电压及砂样不同粒径对电阻率-含水饱和度(
ρ -S r)、电阻率-孔隙水盐浓度(ρ -n )两对关系的影响。结果表明: 进行交流电电阻率试验时, 为减小电阻测试误差, 可选择设置电流频率10 Hz、输入电压1 V;ρ -S r和ρ -n 在交流电与直流电下均满足幂函数关系, 但直流电会使砂柱两侧电极在孔隙水盐质量浓度较高时发生电解反应, 建议选择交流电法开展电阻率试验; 当含水饱和度超过50%时, 砂样粒径引起的电阻率差异较小, 且电阻率不再随含水饱和度增大而明显减小, 保持相对稳定, 指示这一电阻率相对稳定的界面可能分布于含水饱和度约50%的包气带中而非潜水面; 当孔隙水盐质量浓度超过2 g/L后, 5种粒径的饱和砂样电阻率随孔隙水盐质量浓度增大不再明显减小。研究结果证实电阻率法易区分淡水和微咸水, 难以进一步细分盐质量浓度大于2 g/L的微咸水、咸水和卤水。Abstract:Objective The results of laboratory tests on the electrical resistivity of sand are widely used in the interpretation of field electrical resistivity tomography. However, the influences of testing conditions and the field implementations of relationship curves between the electrical resistivity and properties of sand need further research.
Methods First, the electrical resistivity test device was developed by using the two-electrode method. Then, the influences of current type, alternating current (AC) frequency, voltage and grain size of sand on the relationship between electrical resistivity and water saturation (
ρ -S r), as well as electrical resistivity and salinity of the pore water (ρ -n ), were studied.Results The results showed that an AC current frequency of 10 Hz and an input voltage of 1 V were recommended to reduce the test error of resistance. There was a power function between the electrical resistivity and water saturation (
ρ -S r), as well as electrical resistivity and salinity of pore water (ρ -n ), under AC and direct current (DC). As DC might cause an electrolysis reaction of the electrodes of the sand column under the high salinity of pore water, the AC electrical method was suggested. When the water saturation is greater than 50%, the electrical resistivity difference caused by the grain size of sand becomes small. Moreover, the electrical resistivity did not decrease significantly with increasing water saturation, which suggested that a relatively stable interface of the electrical resistivity might exist in the unsaturated zone with 50% saturation rather than in the water table. When the salinity of pore water is greater than 2 g/L, the electrical resistivity of all five types of saturated sands did not decrease obviously with increasing salinity.Conclusion Research results comfirm the electrical resistivity method easily distinguishes fresh water from brackish water but has difficulty further subdividing brackish water, salt water and brine.
-
Key words:
- electrical resistivity /
- two-electrode method /
- AC frequency /
- water saturation /
- salinity
-
图 2 粒径[0.3, 0.6) mm砂样不同含水饱和度的接触电阻
Figure 2. Contact resistance of sand with grain sizes of [0.3, 0.6) mm with different water saturations
图 3 交流电频率(a)与输入电压(b)对电阻率的影响
Figure 3. Impact of alternating current frequency (a) and voltage (b) on the electrical resistivity
图 5 5种砂样电阻率与含水饱和度关系
Figure 5. Relationship between the electrical resistivity and water saturation for five sand types
图 6 5种砂样下电阻率与孔隙水盐质量浓度关系
Figure 6. Relationship between the electrical resistivity and salinity of pore water for five sand types
表 1 5种砂样特性
Table 1. Properties of the five sand types
砂样粒径/mm [0.1, 0.25) [0.25, 0.4] [0.3, 0.6) [0.6, 1) [1, 4] 孔隙度/% 41.5 39.1 40.5 40.1 38.5 干砂密度ρd/
(g·cm-3)1.510 1.535 1.654 1.837 1.730 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 电阻率测试因素及设计值
Table 2. Experimental factors and design values of the electrical resistivity test
测试因素 设计值 电流频率f/Hz 10，102，103，5×104 电压U/V 0.1，0.5，1 砂样粒径/mm [0.1, 0.25)，[0.25, 0.4]，
[0.3, 0.6)，[0.6, 1)，[1, 4]含水饱和度Sr/% 10，20，30，50，70，100 孔隙水盐浓度n/(g·L-1) 0，0.5，1，2，5，10 砂柱长度/cm 7，10.5，14，17.5
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Ramalho E C, Khalil M A, Fernandes J, et al. Geophysical assessment of contamination due to explosives in an abandoned facility towards its hydrogeological characterization[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74(1): 649-663. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4070-y [2] 王泽亚, 徐亚, 董路, 等. 金属离子污染砂土复电阻率的时变特征及形成机制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(3): 1147-1153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHJ201903036.htmWang Z Y, Xu Y, Dong L, et al. Complex resistivity of cationic metal contaminated sandy soils: Time-varying characteristics and formation mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019, 39(3): 1147-1153(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHJ201903036.htm [3] Hermans T, Vandenbohede A, Lebbe L, et al. Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 438/439(3): 168-180. [4] 周越. 典型边坡滑坡地球物理特征与演化机理研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.Zhou Y. Study on geophysical characteristics and evolution mechanism of typical slope landslide[D]. Changchun: : Jilin University, 2021(in Chinese with English abstract). [5] 刘晓, 彭友文, 袁志辉, 等. 高密度电法在堤坝渗漏监测中的模拟及应用[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2021, 41(5): 71-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSD202105012.htmLiu X, Peng Y W, Yuan Z H, et al. Modeling and application of high-density electrical method in dam leakage monitoring[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2021, 41(5): 71-75(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSD202105012.htm [6] Mohammed M A, Senosy M M, Abudeif A M. Derivation of empirical relationships between geotechnical parameters and resistivity using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and borehole data at Sohag University site, upper Egypt[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2019, 158(10): 103563. [7] 韩鹏. 高密度电阻率法在探测不同充填类型溶洞中的正反演研究[J]. 地质与勘探, 2020, 56(6): 1219-1225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT202006010.htmHan P. Forward modeling and inversion of the high-density resistivity method in detecting karst caves of different filling types[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2020, 56(6): 1219-1225(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT202006010.htm [8] 潘剑伟, 占嘉诚, 洪涛, 等. 地面核磁共振方法和高密度电阻率法联合找水[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(3): 253-262. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201803034.htmPan J W, Zhan J C, Hong T, et al. Combined use of surface nuclear magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity imaging in detecting groundwater[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(3): 253-262(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201803034.htm [9] 郭蕾蕾, 魏良帅, 黄安邦, 等. 乌蒙山地区岩溶地下水流系统结构及其找水应用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(1): 146-157. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0025Guo L L, Wei L S, Huang A B, et al. Structure of karst groundwater system and its water exploration in Wumeng Mountain area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(1): 146-157(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0025 [10] Archie G E. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics[J]. Transactions of the AIME, 1942, 146(1): 54-62. doi: 10.2118/942054-G [11] Duan Z, Yan X S, Sun Q, et al. New models for calculating the electrical resistivity of loess affected by moisture content and NaCl concentration[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29: 17280-17294. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16971-z [12] Hasan M F, Abuel-Naga H, Leong E C. A modified series-parallel electrical resistivity model of saturated sand/clay mixture[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 290: 106193. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106193 [13] 张虎元, 王少一, 赵天宇, 等. 利用高密度电阻率法进行盐渍土含水率的测定[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2012, 39(1): 95-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG201201019.htmZhang H Y, Wang S Y, Zhao T Y, et al. Determination of moisture content in saline soil by high density resistivity method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(1): 95-101(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG201201019.htm [14] Abidin M, Saad R, Wijeyesekera D C, et al. The influences of basic physical properties of clayey silt and silty sand on its laboratory electrical resistivity value in loose and dense conditions[J]. Sains Malaysiana, 2017, 46(10): 1959-1969. [15] Yoon G L, Oh M H, Park J B. Laboratory study of landfill leachate effect on resistivity in unsaturated soil using cone penetrometer[J]. Environmental Geology, 2002, 43: 18-28. [16] 罗述伟. 钠盐盐渍土的电阻率特性分析[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.Luo S W. Analysis of the electrical resistivity characteristics of sodium salt saline soil[D]. Xi'an: Northwest A & F University, 2019(in Chinese with English abstract). [17] Chen B, Garré S, Liu H, et al. Two-dimensional monitoring of soil water content in fields with plastic mulching using electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 159: 84-91. [18] Mares R, Barnard H R, Mao D Q, et al. Examining diel patterns of soil and xylem moisture using electrical resistivity imaging[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 536: 327-338. [19] Beff L, Günther T, Vandoorne B, et al. Three-dimensional monitoring of soil water content in a maize field using electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(7): 595-609. [20] Mao D Q, Revil A, Hort R D, et al. Resistivity and self-potential tomography applied to groundwater remediation and contaminant plumes: Sandbox and field experiments[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 530: 1-14. [21] Han T, Best A I, Sothcott J, et al. Relationships among low frequency (2 Hz) electrical resistivity, porosity, clay content and permeability in reservoir sandstones[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2015, 112: 279-289. [22] 申纪伟. 重金属锌污染砂的交流阻抗特性研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2015.Shen J W. Study on AC impedance characteristics of heavy metal zinc-contaminated sand[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2015(in Chinese with English abstract). [23] 董晓强, 黄凤凤, 苏楠楠, 等. 非饱和黄土受压过程中交流电阻率特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(1): 189-197. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201501021.htmDong X Q, Huang F F, Shu N N, et al. Expermental study of AC electrical resistivity of unsaturated loess during compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(1): 189-197(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201501021.htm [24] Personna Y R, Slater L, Ntarlagiannis D, et al. Complex resistivity signatures of ethanol in sand-clay mixtures[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2013, 149: 76-87. [25] 周蜜, 王建国, 黄松波, 等. 土壤电阻率测量影响因素的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(11): 3269-3275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201111014.htmZhou M, Wang J G, Huang S B, et al. Experimental investigation on influencing factors in soil resistivity measurement[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(11): 3269-3275(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201111014.htm [26] 刘晓凤, 邱斌, 刘德, 等. 饱和砂的交流电阻率特性研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2014, 45(5): 653-656. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYGY201405018.htmLiu X F, Qiu B, Liu D, et al. Study on AC electrical resistivity of saturated sand[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2014, 45(5): 653-656(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYGY201405018.htm [27] Xu D, Sun R L, Yeh T C J, et al. Mapping soil layers using electrical resistivity tomography and validation: Sandbox experiments[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 575: 523-536. [28] Jiang L Q, Sun R L, Yeh T C J, et al. Inverse modeling of different stimuli and hydraulic tomography: A laboratory sandbox investigation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 603: 127108. [29] 梁杏, 郭会荣, 孙蓉琳. 水文地质学基础实验实习教程[M]. 第3版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2019.Liang X, Guo H R, Sun R L. Experiment andpractical textbook of fundamentals of hydrorogeology[M]. Third Edition. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2019(in Chinese). [30] 吴迪, 王炳辉, 周爱兆. 饱和砂土电阻率的测试方法研究[J]. 江苏科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 29(2): 186-192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDCB201502016.htmWu D, Wang B H, Zhou A Z. Study on the test method of saturated sand resistivity[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2015, 29(2): 186-192(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDCB201502016.htm [31] 刘晓凤, 申纪伟, 张少华, 等. 非饱和铜污染砂的交流电阻率特性[J]. 广西大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 39(4): 833-840. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXKZ201404021.htmLiu X F, Shen J W, Zhang S H, et al. AC electrical resistivity properties of unsaturated sand polluted by copper[J]. Journal of Guangxi University: Natural Science Edition, 2014, 39(4): 833-840(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXKZ201404021.htm [32] 于天仁, 季国亮, 李成保. 土壤和水研究中的电化学方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991.Yu T R, Ji G L, Li C B. Electrochemical methods in soil and water research[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1991(in Chinese). [33] Dietrich S, Carrera J, Weinzettel P, et al. Estimation of specific yield and its variability by electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(11): 8653-8673. [34] 宋志伟, 董晓强, 高宜涛, 等. 重金属锌污染砂的交流电阻率特性试验[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2015, 37(5): 60-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JIAN201505009.htmSong Z W, Dong X Q, Gao Y T, et al. Experimental analysis of AC resistivity properties of zinc contaminated sand[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2015, 37(5): 60-65(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JIAN201505009.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 283
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
