近似圆形矿坑边坡稳定性轴对称简化计算方法

王杰; 吕加贺; 谭飞; 刘礼领

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220284

近似圆形矿坑边坡稳定性轴对称简化计算方法

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220284

王杰^1,,
吕加贺^1, ,,
谭飞¹,
刘礼领²

1.
中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院, 武汉 430074
2.
中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司, 武汉 430000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 51979253

详细信息

作者简介:
王杰(1997—), 男, 现正攻读土木工程专业硕士学位, 主要从事岩土工程中的数值模拟方法研究。E-mail：jiewang@cug.edu.cn

通讯作者:
吕加贺(1989—), 男, 教授, 主要从事土木工程中的数值计算方法研究。E-mail：lvjiahe@cug.edu.cn

中图分类号: P642.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 350
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-20

Axisymmetric simplified method for stability analysis of an circular-like mine slope

Wang Jie^1
,,
Lü Jiahe^{1
, ,},
Tan Fei¹,
Liu Liling²

1.
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
2.
Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Wuhan 430000, China

摘要

摘要:
为响应国家“绿水青山就是金山银山”的发展理念, 对废弃矿坑的开发再利用成为热点, 而采用合理的稳定性评价方法对废弃矿坑边坡加固设计是后续工作的关键。但这类矿坑边坡通常形状近似圆形或椭圆形, 三维空间效应不容忽略, 基于传统平面应变假设的简化方法对其进行稳定性分析似乎不太合理。在FLAC3D强度折减法的基础上, 提出了一种针对近似圆形矿坑边坡稳定性分析的轴对称模型简化计算方法。基于计算结果的对比分析表明：①对于这种类似圆形凹坡, 轴对称模型计算的安全系数比传统平面应变模型更准确, 减少了计算时间, 并且轴对称模型对于各种复杂程度不同的边坡类型同样适用；②轴对称模型计算的安全系数与三维模型计算的安全系数非常接近, 而传统平面应变模型计算的安全系数偏于保守；③将轴对称模型计算结果与现有研究对比, 表明两者结果相符, 并将其进一步应用于长沙冰雪世界项目矿坑边坡加固工程的稳定性分析中, 证明其可为类似工程的边坡稳定性评价提供参考。
- 矿坑边坡 /
- FLAC3D /
- 轴对称模型 /
- 平面应变模型
Abstract:
To follow the national development concept of "Lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets", the reuse of abandoned mines has become a hotspot. A reasonable stability analysis method to reinforce the slope must be proposed. However, the shape of common mine slope is close to a circle or an ellipse, and thus the three-dimensional space effect of stability cannot be ignored. Based on the strength reduction method of FLAC3D, an axisymmetric numerical analysis method was proposed. Through comparative calculation and analysis, some conclusions can be obtained as follows: (1)For concave slopes with circular-likeshape, the safety factor calculated by the axisymmetric model is more accurate than that of the traditional plane strain model, the calculation time of the proposed model is less, and the proposed model is also applicable to various types of slopes. (2)The safety factor obtained from the axisymmetric model is close to the results obtained from the 3-D model, while the safety factor obtained from the traditional plane strain model is conservative.(3)The calculation results of the axisymmetric model are also consistent with the results from the literature. The proposed model is further applied to the stability analysis of a mine slope reinforcement in Changsha Ice World, which can also be applied in the slope stability evaluation of similar projects.
- mine slope /
- FLAC3D /
- axisymmetric model /
- plane strain model

HTML全文

图 1 模型尺寸示意图

Figure 1. Dimensions of the model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 3种计算模型及其边界条件

Figure 2. Three numerical models and their boundary conditions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 归一化速度云图

Figure 3. Normalized velocity contour

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同坡角的安全系数

Figure 4. Safety factor under different slope angles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同土体参数计算结果

Figure 5. Calculation results under different soil parameters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 边坡模型示意图

Figure 6. Schematic of the slope model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 矿坑地区平面图

A-A、B-B、C-C、D-D均为地质剖面编号

Figure 7. Topographic plan of the mine

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 矿坑地质剖面图

Figure 8. Geological profiles of the mine

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 削坡前矿坑模型

Figure 9. Numerical model of the slope before cutting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 削坡前矿坑边坡各剖面安全系数曲线

Figure 10. FOS curve of each section of slope before cutting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同剖面削坡处理示意图(1∶1等为坡率)

Figure 11. Schematic diagram of slope cutting of different sections

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 削坡后矿坑模型

Figure 12. Numerical model of the slope after cutting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 坡后矿坑边坡各剖面安全系数曲线

Figure 13. FOS curve of each section of slope after cutting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 典型剖面归一化速度云图

Figure 14. Normalized velocity contours of typical sections

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 土体力学参数表

Table 1. Mechanical parameters of soil

密度ρ/ (kg∙m^-3)	弹性模量E/GPa	泊松比μ	黏聚力c/kPa	内摩擦角φ/(°)
2 400	4.3	0.2	28	27

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 边坡土体力学参数

Table 2. Mechanical parameters of slope

土体类型	ρ/(kg·m^-3)	E/MPa	μ	c/kPa	φ/(°)
软弱夹层	1 850	20	0.4	10	10
土层	1 800/2 000	80	0.3	28.5/26.0	20.0/18.0
注：“/”前后分别为土层的天然参数和饱和参数

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同方法的安全系数计算结果

Table 3. Safety factor obtained from different methods

三维模型	轴对称模型	平面应变模型	极限平衡法^[10]
0.988	0.939	0.69	0.739

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 安全系数计算结果对比

Table 4. Comparison of safety factor

λ	坡角β/ (°)	文献[21] 结果	三维模型	轴对称模型	平面应变模型
0.2	30	1.91	1.97	1.87	1.60
	45	1.58	1.57	1.50	1.25
	75	1.08	1.14	1.04	0.81
1.0	30	2.38	2.37	2.26	1.60
	45	2.06	2.02	1.95	1.55
	75	1.51	1.61	1.56	1.21

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 长沙冰雪世界项目边坡岩土体力学参数

Table 5. Mechanical parameters of the slope in Changsha Ice World

土体类型	ρ/(kg∙m^-3)	E/GPa	μ	c/kPa	φ/(°)
粉质黏土	1 800	1.0	0.22	50	19
微风化灰岩	2 400	6	0.32	280	27

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	彭柏兴, 王会云, 王小平, 等. 长沙冰雪世界高陡边坡工程地质特征及其稳定性评价[J]. 城市勘测, 2021(5): 181-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSKC202105045.htm Peng B X, Wang H Y, Wang X P, et al. Engineering geological characteristics and stability evaluation of high and steep slopes in Changsha Ice World[J]. Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2021(5): 181-187(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSKC202105045.htm
[2]	肖锐铧, 王思敬, 贺小黑, 等. 非均质边坡多级稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(6): 1062-1068. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201306012.htm Xiao R H, Wang S J, He X H, et al. Multi-level stability analysis of inhomogeneous slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(6): 1062-1068(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201306012.htm
[3]	吴益平, 卢里尔, 薛阳. 基于临界状态的边坡渐进破坏力学模型分析及应用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(5): 1-7. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0501 Wu Y P, Lu L R, Xue Y. Application of landside progressive failure mechanical model based on the stress state[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(5): 1-7(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0501
[4]	赵尚毅, 郑颖人, 时卫民, 等. 用有限元强度折减法求边坡稳定安全系数[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(3): 343-346. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC200203016.htm Zhao S Y, Zheng Y R, Shi W M, et al. Analysis on safety factor of slope by strength reduction FEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(3): 343-346(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC200203016.htm
[5]	周珂, 黄小城, 雷德阳, 等. 平面剪切岩质边坡滑裂面的确定及稳定性分析[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(2): 325-334. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0062 Zhou K, Huang X C, Lei D Y, et al. Determinations of the critical sliding surface of planar sliding rock slopes and their stability analysis[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(2): 325-334(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0062
[6]	Michalowski R L. Stability charts for uniform slopes[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(4): 351-355. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Radoslaw_Michalowski/publication/245293997_Stability_Charts_for_Uniform_Slopes/links/567ea4fe08aebccc4e05d233.pdf
[7]	连镇营, 韩国城, 孔宪京. 强度折减有限元法研究开挖边坡的稳定性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2001, 23(4): 407-411. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC200104004.htm Lian Z Y, Han G C, Kong X J. Stability analysis of excavation by strength reduction FEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(4): 407-411(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC200104004.htm
[8]	张雪娅, 秦庆词, 张雪娇. MIDAS三维数值软件在深凹露天边坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2019, 48(7): 56-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGKJ201907015.htm Zhang X Y, Qin Q C, Zhang X J. Application of MIDAS three-dimensional numerical software in stability evaluation of deep concave slope[J]. Industrial Minerals & Processing, 2019, 48(7): 56-59(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HGKJ201907015.htm
[9]	王龙. 非饱和土边坡三维稳定性极限分析研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2019. Wang L. Limit analysis of three-dimensional stability of unsaturated soil slopes[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2019(in Chinese with English abstract).
[10]	徐文刚, 余旭荣, 年廷凯, 等. 基于FLAC^3D的三维边坡稳定性强度折减法计算效率改进算法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2021, 51(5): 1347-1355. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202105007.htm Xu W G, Yu X R, Nian T K, et al. Optimization and application of FLAC^3D strength-reduction computation in three-dimension slope stability analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2021, 51(5): 1347-1355(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202105007.htm
[11]	徐芝纶. 弹性力学简明教程[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1980. Xu Z L. A concise course in elasticity[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1980(in Chinese).
[12]	孙朝燚, 陈从新, 郑允, 等. 基于空间效应的弃渣场边坡稳定性方法探讨[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019, 54(1): 97-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201901013.htm Sun C Y, Chen C X, Zheng Y, et al. Discussion on slope stability analysis method of abandoned dreg site based on spatial effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 97-105(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNJT201901013.htm
[13]	Baker R, Leshchinsky D. Stability analysis of conical heaps[J]. Doshitsu Kögakkai Ronbun Hökokushuü, 1987, 27(4): 99-110. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110003985196/en
[14]	王家臣, 杜竞中. 水平凸型边坡破坏分析[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 1992, 21(2): 105-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD199202013.htm Wang J C, Du J Z. The failure analysis of horizontal convex earth slopes[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 1992, 21(2): 105-111(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD199202013.htm
[15]	赵衡, 宋二祥. 圆形凸坡的稳定性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(5): 730-737. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201105015.htm Zhao H, Song E X. Stability analysis of circular convex slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(5): 730-737(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201105015.htm
[16]	卢坤林, 朱大勇. 坡面形态对边坡稳定性影响的理论与试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(1): 35-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201401004.htm Lu K L, Zhu D Y. Theoretical and experimental study of effect of slope topography on its stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1): 35-42(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201401004.htm
[17]	赵尚毅, 郑颖人, 张玉芳. 有限元强度折减法中边坡失稳的判据探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(2): 332-336. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX20050200Y.htm Zhao S Y, Zheng Y R, Zhang Y F. Study on slope failure criterion in strength reduction finite element method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(2): 332-336(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX20050200Y.htm
[18]	张鲁渝, 郑颖人, 赵尚毅, 等. 有限元强度折减系数法计算土坡稳定安全系数的精度研究[J]. 水利学报, 2003, 34(1): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB200301004.htm Zhang L Y, Zheng Y R, Zhao S Y, et al. The feasibility study of strength-reduction method with FEM for calculating safety factors of soil slope stability[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 34(1): 21-27(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB200301004.htm
[19]	肖景红, 王敏, 王川, 等. 含优势渗流层边坡降雨入渗下的可靠度分析[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(6): 193-204. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0619 Xiao J H, Wang M, Wang C. Reliability analysis of slope with dominant seepage interlayer under rainfall infiltration[J]. Bulletin of Geology Science and Technology, 2021, 40(6): 193-204(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0619
[20]	曾江波, 付智勇, 肖林超, 等. 基于降雨作用下滑面抗剪强度动态变化的层状边坡稳定性评价[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(4): 225-231. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201804031.htm Zeng J B, Fu Z Y, Xiao L C, et al. Slope stability evaluation considering variation of shear strength of slip surface in layered slope under rainfall[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(4): 225-231(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201804031.htm
[21]	Sun C W, Chai J R, Xu Z G, et al. 3D stability charts for convex and concave slopes in plan view with homogeneous soil based on the strength-reduction method[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(5): 06016034.
[22]	Cheng Y M, Liu H T, Wei W B, et al. Location of critical three-dimensional non-spherical failure surface by NURBS functions and ellipsoid with applications to highway slopes[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2005, 32(6): 387-399. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000034063069210_a3fc.html
[23]	长沙市规划勘测设计研究院. 长沙冰雪世界项目岩土工程详细勘察报告[R]. 长沙: 长沙市规划勘测设计研究院, 2014. Changsha Planning & Design Survey Research Institute. Geotechnical engineering detailed investigation report of Changsha Ice World[R]. Changsha: Changsha Planning & Design Survey Research Institute, 2014(in Chinese).

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

图(14) / 表(5)

计量

文章访问数: 350
PDF下载量: 24
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

近似圆形矿坑边坡稳定性轴对称简化计算方法

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220284

作者简介:
王杰(1997—), 男, 现正攻读土木工程专业硕士学位, 主要从事岩土工程中的数值模拟方法研究。E-mail：jiewang@cug.edu.cn

通讯作者:
吕加贺(1989—), 男, 教授, 主要从事土木工程中的数值计算方法研究。E-mail：lvjiahe@cug.edu.cn

计量

Axisymmetric simplified method for stability analysis of an circular-like mine slope

计量

目录

留言板

近似圆形矿坑边坡稳定性轴对称简化计算方法

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220284

作者简介: 王杰(1997—), 男, 现正攻读土木工程专业硕士学位, 主要从事岩土工程中的数值模拟方法研究。E-mail：jiewang@cug.edu.cn

通讯作者: 吕加贺(1989—), 男, 教授, 主要从事土木工程中的数值计算方法研究。E-mail：lvjiahe@cug.edu.cn

计量

出版历程

Axisymmetric simplified method for stability analysis of an circular-like mine slope

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
王杰(1997—), 男, 现正攻读土木工程专业硕士学位, 主要从事岩土工程中的数值模拟方法研究。E-mail：jiewang@cug.edu.cn

通讯作者:
吕加贺(1989—), 男, 教授, 主要从事土木工程中的数值计算方法研究。E-mail：lvjiahe@cug.edu.cn