Occurrence characteristics and depositional model of graptolites from the black shale in the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation and Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation
-
摘要: 在总结前人研究的基础上,综合岩石矿物、地球化学等分析测试资料对宜昌地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩层系中笔石的赋存状态及其沉积环境进行了深入研究。结果显示:五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩中笔石的赋存状态存在显著差异,笔石的丰度由下至上呈现由高到低的变化趋势,硅质炭质页岩中的笔石丰度最高,以杂乱堆积为主,部分可见弱定向排列特征;灰绿色泥岩与黑色硅质页岩中笔石丰度低,以碎片为主,且硅质页岩中的笔石碎片细小。笔石的分异度在纵向上也呈现出规律性变化,赫南特阶笔石分异度最低,埃隆阶与凯迪阶对应的笔石分异度高。综合研究表明,不同笔石赋存状态所对应的有机碳质量分数w(TOC)、围岩性质、氧化还原条件、古海洋环境与水动力条件均有所差异:高笔石丰度的页岩往往对应着较高的w(TOC);石英质量分数在40%~60%的黑色页岩中笔石最为发育;笔石在弱氧化和还原环境中均能保存,但还原环境更有利于笔石的大规模富集;纵向上笔石丰度与分异度变化均受到了古环境的显著影响, 赫南特冰期造成了笔石的大量死亡和分异度的显著降低;笔石的大量混杂堆积显示悬浮沉积是主要的沉积作用方式,而定向排列的笔石应是深水底流作用的结果。基于上述页岩中笔石赋存状态差异及其沉积地质指示,深入分析了不同笔石赋存状态的沉积环境并建立了五峰组-龙马溪组沉积期的笔石堆积模式。Abstract: Based on the pervious researches, the occurrence characteristics and depositional environment of graptolites from the black shale of the upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation and Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Yichang area are analyzed in detail through integrating mineral and geochemical data. The results show that the occurrence characteristics of graptolites from the black shale in the Wufeng and Longamxi Formations are different, with graptolites abundance decreasing gradually from the lower part to the upper part. Carbonaceous shale always has a lot of graptolites, and most of graptolites are disordered except some of them are stored regularly. The graptolites abundance in greyish-green shale and black siliceous shale is low and most of graptolites are composed of fragments smaller in the black siliceous shale. Graptolite diversification in the black shale also shows regular variations, and the graptolite diversification in the Hirnantian is much lower than that in the Aeronian and Katian. Comprehensive analysis indicates different graptolite occurrence characteristics usually have various TOC, surrounding rock properties, oxidation-deoxidation conditions, palaeoenvironment and hydrodynamic conditions. The shale with rich graptolites abundance often has high value of TOC, with their quartz content usually ranging from 40% to 60%. Graptolites can be deposited both in weak oxidation and deoxidation conditions, but the deoxidation environment is much more favorable for graptolites sedimentation and preservation. The vertical variations in graptolite diversification and graptolites abundance are obviously influenced by palaeoenvironment, and the lower graptolite diversification and massive disappearance of graptolite in the Hirnantian are caused by glaciation and sea-level changes. Disordered graptolites are the results of suspended sedimentation, while the graptolites with directional alignment indicate reformation by ocean current. Finally, based on the different graptolite occurrence characteristics and their sedimentary geological significance, their sedimentary environment is discussed in detail and the depositional model of graptolites in the Wufeng and Longamxi Formations is proposed.
-
图 2 宜昌地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩层系笔石丰度特征
a.硅质炭质页岩,笔石数量大于80,面笔率约70%,龙马溪组,鄂宜页2井;b.硅质炭质页岩,笔石数量大于70,面笔率约42%,五峰组,鄂宜页3井;c.硅质炭质页岩,见少量笔石,面笔率小于5%,五峰组,鄂宜页3井;d.硅质页岩,仅见2个笔石碎片,龙马溪组,鄂宜页3井;e.灰黑色含炭页岩,笔石数量13,面笔率约7%,部分笔石破碎,龙马溪组,鄂宜页3井;f.灰绿色泥页岩,未见笔石,龙马溪组,鄂宜页2井
Figure 2. Typical photos of graptolites abundance in different lithological rocks in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations, Yichang area
图 3 笔石定向性特征及五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩笔石排列特征照片
a.笔石无定向排列模型,笔石体混杂堆积;b.笔石弱定向排列模型,存在一个主体笔石方向;c.笔石定向排列模型,基本上所有笔石体均指向同一方向;d.硅质炭质页岩,笔石无定向排列,五峰组,鄂宜页3井;e.硅质炭质页岩,笔石弱定向排列,五峰组,鄂宜页2井;f.硅质炭质页岩,笔石定向排列,五峰组,鄂宜页2井
Figure 3. Features of graptolites directionality and typical photos from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations, Yichang area
-
[1] 陈孝红, 张保民, 陈林, 等.鄂西宜昌地区晚奥陶世-早志留世页岩气藏的主控地质因素与富集模式[J].地球学报, 2018, 39(3):257-268. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQXB201803001.htm [2] 董大忠, 施振生, 管全中, 等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气勘探进展、挑战与前景[J].天然气工业, 2018, 38(4):67-76. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_natural-gas-industry_thesis/0201218476547.html [3] 邹才能, 龚剑明, 王红岩, 等.笔石生物演化与地层年代标定在页岩气勘探开发中的重大意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(1):1-6. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgsykt201901001 [4] 陈旭, 樊隽轩, 王文卉, 等.黔渝地区志留系龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的阶段性渐进展布模式[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2017(6):94-106. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkx-cd201706005 [5] Fan J X, Melchin M J, Chen X, et al.Biostratigraphy and Geography of the Ordovician-Silurian Lungmachi Black Shales in South China[J].Sci.China:Earth.Sci., 2011, 54:1854-1863. doi: 10.1007/s11430-011-4301-3 [6] 王红岩, 郭伟, 梁峰, 等.宣汉-巫溪地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层特征及分层对比[J].天然气工业, 2017, 37(7):27-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TRQG201707008.htm [7] 王勤, 钱门辉, 蒋启贵, 等.中国南方海相烃源岩中笔石生烃能力研究[J].岩矿测试, 2017, 36(3):258-264. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ykcs201703008 [8] 邱振, 邹才能, 李熙喆, 等.论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献:以华南地区五峰组-龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5):606-615. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TDKX201805002.htm [9] 陈旭.论笔石的深度分带[J].古生物学报, 1990, 29(5):507-526. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=252295 [10] 王传尚, 汪啸风, 陈孝红.奥陶纪笔石体的复杂化及其与海平面变化的关系[J].华南地质与矿产, 2000(1):11-15. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200000723591 [11] 王传尚, 汪啸风.早-中奥陶世之交笔石动物群全球分布及其控制作用[J].地质科技情报, 2011, 30(2):41-44, 51. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201102007 [12] 张元动, 陈旭, Goldman D, 等.华南早-中奥陶世主要环境下笔石动物的多样性与生物地理分布[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2010, 40(9):1164-1180. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkx-cd201009007 [13] 李刚, 赵迪斐, 郭英海.川东南地区龙马溪组页岩笔石与沉积环境的关系[J].科学技术与工程, 2018, 445(12):21-28. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxjsygc201812003 [14] 李志明, 全秋琦.中国南部奥陶-志留纪笔石页岩相类型及其构造古地理[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1992, 17(3):261-269. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQKX199203003.htm [15] 王怿, 戎嘉余, 詹仁斌, 等.鄂西南奥陶系-志留系交界地层研究兼论宜昌上升[J].地层学杂志, 2013, 37(3):264-274. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dcxzz201303002 [16] Chen X, Rong, J Y, Li Y, et al.Facies Patterns and Geography of the Yangtze Region, South China, through the Ordovician and Silurian Transition[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2004, 204(3):353-372. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=718f4d80d70c927b194fce399fb06706 [17] 严德天, 王清晨, 陈代钊, 等.扬子及周缘地区上奥陶统-下志留统烃源岩发育环境及其控制因素[J].地质学报, 2008, 82(3):321-327. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200803005 [18] 刘伟, 许效松, 余谦, 等.中上扬子晚奥陶世赫南特期岩相古地理[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 39(1):32-39. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cdlgxyxb201201005 [19] 张靖宇, 陆永潮, 付孝悦, 等.四川盆地涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组一段层序格架与沉积演化[J].地质科技情报, 2017, 36(4):65-72. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93477A/201704/672650084.html [20] 陈旭, 樊隽轩, 张元动, 等.五峰组及龙马溪组黑色页岩在扬子覆盖区内的划分与圈定[J].地层学杂志, 2015, 39(4):351-358. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dcxzz201504001 [21] 尹海鉴, 王约, 陈洪德, 等.黔北桐梓奥陶系五峰组黑色页岩的笔石定向性[J].贵州大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 29(5):31-34. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gzdxxb201205008 [22] 陈旭, 戎嘉余, 樊隽轩, 等.扬子区奥陶纪末赫南特亚阶的生物地层学研究[J].地层学杂志, 2000, 24(3):173-175. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dcxzz200003001 [23] 陈旭, 米切尔.奥陶-志留系界线地层生物全球对比[J].古生物学报, 2000, 39(1):100-114. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gswxb200001008 [24] 王传尚, 汪啸风, 陈孝红.奥陶系/志留系界线之交生物的绝灭与复苏[J].华南地质与矿产, 2001(2):28-34. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hndzykc200102005 [25] 邱振, 董大忠, 卢斌, 等.中国南方五峰组-龙马溪组页岩中笔石与有机质富集关系探讨[J].沉积学报, 2016, 34(6):1011-1020. http://www.cnki.com.cn/article/cjfdtotal-cjxb201606001.htm [26] 韦恒叶.古海洋生产力与氧化还原指标:元素地球化学综述[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2012, 32(2):76-88. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/98500a/20122/43168410.html [27] 陈旭, 肖承协, 陈洪冶.华南五峰期笔石动物群的分异及缺氧环境[J].古生物学报, 1987, 26(3):326-338. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GSWX198703013.htm [28] 王传尚, 汪啸风, 陈孝红, 等.海水表面温度变化及其对笔石动物群分布的控制作用:以湖北宜昌奥陶系大湾组为例[J].地质学报, 2009, 83(6):751-758. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb200906001 [29] Yan D T, Chen D Z, Wang Q C, et al.Large-scale climatic uctuations in the latest Ordovician on the Yangtze block, South China[J].Geology, 2010, 38(7):599-602. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZDQ201101002065.htm [30] Zou C N, Qiu Z, Poulton S W, et al.Ocean euxinia and climate change "double whammy" drove the Late Ordovician mass extinction[J].Geology, 2018, 46(6):535-538. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=87ae4279134d01696bd50fe6ea3484de [31] 何卫红, 汪啸风, 卜建军.晚奥陶世五峰期扬子海盆海平面变化旋回与古水体深度[J].沉积学报, 2002, 20(3):367-375. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cjxb200203002 [32] 李朋, 何仁亮, 宗维, 等.鄂西恩施奥陶系-志留系界线附近沉积地球化学与沉积环境[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(2):17-23, 34. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201802003 [33] 王玉满, 李新景, 董大忠, 等.上扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组优质页岩沉积主控因素[J].天然气工业, 2017, 37(4):9-20. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201704002 [34] 孙莎莎, 芮昀, 董大忠, 等.中、上扬子地区晚奥陶世-早志留世古地理演化及页岩沉积模式[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6):1087-1106. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_syytrqdz201806002.aspx [35] 雒昆利, 邓宝.陕南志留系五峡河组地层的沉积环境与笔石生活和保存的关系[J].沉积学报, 1992, 10(2):79-87. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-CJXB199202009.htm [36] 聂海宽, 金之钧, 马鑫, 等.四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组底部笔石带及沉积特征[J].石油学报, 2017, 38(2):160-174. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201702004