Comparison in petroleum geology between Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression in Nanxiang Basin and its exploration significance
-
摘要: 泌阳凹陷和南阳凹陷均属于南襄盆地次级构造单元，两者被唐河低凸起分隔，有效勘探面积相近，但凹陷资源量、已探明地质储量、石油天然气产量差异很大，油气分布具不均衡性。以两个凹陷的地震、钻井、测录井、地球化学资料为基础，立足于已有的勘探地质认识，从大地构造、含油气盆地要素分析、石油地质学的角度深入分析了两凹陷的相似性和差异性。研究结果表明，两凹陷在大地构造背景、构造演化阶段、凹陷平面形态、地层系统等方面具相似性。两凹陷的差异性主要表现在基底性质、边界断裂特征、沉降特征、地温特征、烃源岩特征、沉积体系、储集层物性、生储盖配置、圈闭特征、油气成藏期次及成藏模式10个方面。其中，基底性质和凹陷地质结构差异导致的油气成藏要素和成藏作用不同是油气分布不均衡性的决定因素。油气地质特征类比表明，南阳凹陷勘探程度相对较低，只要借鉴泌阳凹陷的成功勘探经验，创新地质认识，配套勘探关键技术，开展多领域、多层次、多油藏类型的立体勘探，仍具有较大的勘探潜力。Abstract: Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression are secondary structural units of Nanxiang Basin. They are separated by Tanghe low uplift and have similar effective exploration areas. However, the resources, proven geological reserves and oil productions of the two depressions are quite different. Based on the seismic, drilling, logging, geochemical data and current exploration knowledge of the two depressions, we compared their similarities and differences from the prospective of geotectonics, basin analysis and petroleum geology. We have found they share the following points : geotectonic setting, tectonic evolution stages, depression plane modality and stratigraphic systems. However, they are different more remarkably in basement properties, boundary fault characteristics, subsidence characteristics, geothermal characteristics, source rock characteristics, sedimentary system, reservoir physical properties, source-reservoir-seal rock associations, trap conditions, petroleum accumulation mechanisms and preservation patterns. Among these aspects, the overwhelming important factors for controlling the oil and gas distributions are the basement properties and geological framework that control the accumulation factors and effects. The analogy of petroleum geological characteristics shows that the exploration degree in Nanyang Depression is relatively low. Our understanding of the successful exploration experience of Biyang Depression, our geological knowledge, and key exploration technologies, and multi-domain, multi-level, and multi-reservoir type stereoscopic exploration, suggests that the depression still have great exploration potential.
-
图 1 泌阳、南阳凹陷区域地质简图
a.南襄盆地大地构造纲要图；b.南襄盆地构造单元划分简图；c.泌阳、南阳凹陷勘探形势图；d.过南阳-泌阳凹陷的东西向区域横剖面图；e.过南阳凹陷的南北向区域横剖面图；f.过泌阳凹陷的南北向区域横剖面图
Figure 1. Regional geology of Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
图 2 南襄盆地及周缘地区布格重力异常图
Figure 2. Bouguer gravity anomaly of Nanxiang Basin and its peripheral areas
图 3 南襄盆地及周缘磁力异常ΔTa平面图
Figure 3. Magnetic anomaly of Nanxiang Basin and its peripheral areas
图 4 泌阳、南阳凹陷沉降曲线图
Figure 4. Subsidence curve of Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
图 5 泌阳、南阳凹陷核桃园组烃源岩特征
a.泌阳凹陷烃源岩类型图；b.南阳凹陷烃源岩类型图；c.泌阳、南阳凹陷烃源岩有机碳含量频率分布图；d.泌阳、南阳凹陷镜质体反射率曲线图；e.泌阳凹陷核桃园组泥岩分布范围图；f.南阳凹陷核桃园组泥岩分布范围图
Figure 5. Characteristics of hydrocarbon source rocks of Hetaoyuan Formation in Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
图 6 泌阳、南阳凹陷核桃园组沉积体系示意图
Figure 6. Sedimentary system of Hetaoyuan Formation in Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
图 7 泌阳、南阳凹陷圈闭类型示意图
Figure 7. Trapping styles between Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
图 8 泌阳、南阳凹陷油气成藏模式对比图(Eh.核桃园组; El.廖庄组；Eh2Ⅰ~Eh3Ⅷ.油组编号)
Figure 8. Oil and gas accumulation models between Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
表 1 泌阳凹陷和南阳凹陷各油田储层孔渗性能统计
Table 1. Statistics of reservoir porosity and permeability in Biyang Depression and Nanyang Depression
泌阳凹陷油田名称 井楼 古城 付湾 杨楼 新庄 下二门 双河 王集 赵凹 平均孔隙度/% 23.9 22.6 19.7 23.8 20.2 19.4 17.7 12.4 9.7 平均渗透率/10-3 μm2 811 488 792 540 632 1 411 497 364 70 南阳凹陷油田名称 魏岗 官庄 张店 白秋 马店 北马庄 黑龙庙 东庄 平均孔隙度/% 17.8 15.1 13.6 21.4 11.2 12.1 6.9 15 平均渗透率/10-3 μm2 491 229 157 621 44 32 13 28 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 夏东领, 杨道庆, 林社卿, 等.南襄盆地中新生代构造演化与油气成藏[J].石油地质与采收率, 2007, 14(6):32-34. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y1784990 [2] 蔡佳, 王华, 罗家群.基于层序地层格架的南阳凹陷油气成藏模式[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 33(3):67-73. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xnsyxyxb201103010 [3] 程喆.泌阳凹陷成藏动力学系统研究[D].北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2007. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82501-2007066871.htm [4] 翟中喜, 陆建林, 胡望水, 等.泌阳凹陷新生代构造控油规律研究[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2010, 32(3):43-58. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jhsyxyxb201003009 [5] 何登发, 李德生, 何金友, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷和西南坳陷油气地质特征类比及勘探启示[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(2):201-218. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201302001 [6] Meng Q R, Zhang G W. Geologic framework and tectonic evolution of the Qinling Orogen, central China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 323:183-196. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00106-2 [7] Hacker B R, Ratschbacher L, Webb L, et al.U/Pb zircon ages constrain the architecture of the ultrahigh-pressure Qinling-Dabie Orogen, China[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1998, 161(1/4):215-230 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=4892fa8688e56b79bc5bfab34752e83f&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [8] Hacker B R, Ratschbacher L, Webb L, et al. Exhumation of ultrahigh-pressure continental crust in east central China: Late Triassic-Early Jurassic tectonic unroofing[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105(B6):13339-13364. doi: 10.1029/2000JB900039 [9] Ye K, Cong B L, Ye D L.The possible subduction of continental material to depths greater than 200 km[J].Nature, 2000, 407:734-736. doi: 10.1038/35037566 [10] Liu X W, Jin Z M, Green H W Ⅱ.Clinoenstatite exsolution in diopsidic augite of Dabieshan: Garnet peridotite from depth of 300 km[J].The American Mineralogist, 2007, 92(4):546-552. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=a83841934a9ce6aa6b91b6a5c87bfb86&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [11] 潘作枢, 丁凤仪, 王宝林.南襄盆地深部过程分析及重磁异常[J].西安地质学院学报, 1986, 8(1):56-62. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XAGX198601007.htm [12] 卢顺荣, 温长顺, 许顺山.南阳凹陷构造模拟实验及其成因机制的探讨[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1989, 14(增刊):97-105. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQKX1989S1016.htm [13] 李连生.泌阳凹陷结构构造与油气成藏[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2007, 29(3):344-346. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JHSX200703108.htm [14] 王定一, 车自成, 张树田, 等.南襄盆地构造发育特征及形成机制[J].石油与天然气地质, 1987, 8(4):363-371. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYYT198704004.htm [15] 罗开平, 范小林.南襄盆地岩石圈构造与盆地深部过程及油气前景[J].石油天然气学报, 2006, 28(3):167-170. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JHSX200603052.htm [16] 田纳新, 吴官生, 李锋, 等.南襄盆地南阳凹陷构造特征与油气聚集[J].石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(6):51-55. [17] Zhang G W, Meng Q R, Yu Z P, et al.Orogenesis and dynamics of the Qinling orogen[J].Science in China: Series D, 1996, 39(3):225-234. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=9ac292ed84054ac6c0b0003fab83af51&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [18] 夏东领, 胡望水.南襄盆地中、新生代构造沉降史分析与构造演化[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2010, 32(1):17-21. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jhsyxyxb201001004 [19] 吕久明.南襄盆地南阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(3):392-398. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syytrqdz201203008 [20] 孙冲.复杂断块油田成藏控制因素-以泌阳凹陷北部斜坡带为例[D].北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2006. [21] 邱荣华.泌阳富油凹陷北部斜坡带浅层复杂断块群油气勘探[J].石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(6):813-840. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syytrqdz200606012 [22] 吴群, 朱颜, 王树芳, 等.泌阳凹陷张厂地区E2h3Ⅳ砂组滩坝砂沉积学特征及勘探意义[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(1):19-23. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201401003 [23] 程学峰, 于群达, 吴跃通, 等.层序地层学研究及隐蔽油气藏预测-以南阳凹陷古近系为例[J].新疆地质, 2003, 21(2):206-209. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xjdz200302013 [24] 朱军, 张本书, 赵天富, 等.近岸水下冲积扇储层特征研究:以南阳凹陷北马庄-黑龙庙地区为例[J].石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(5):48-55. [25] 李海燕.南阳凹陷古近系核桃园组沉积微相研究[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2008, 28(4):44-49. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yxgdl200804008 [26] 马义权, 刘晓峰, 李晓娜, 等.泌阳凹陷王集油田核桃园组三段沉积演化[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(1):115-120. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201401018 [27] 秦伟军, 林社卿, 程喆, 等.南襄盆地泌阳凹陷油气成藏作用及成藏模式[J].石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(5):668-673. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syytrqdz200505018 [28] 邱荣华, 林社卿, 涂阳发.泌阳凹陷油气成藏特征及勘探潜力分析[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报, 2005, 27(2):158-161. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jhsyxyxb200502006 [29] 史忠生, 何生.南阳凹陷古近系核桃园组二段储集层流体包裹体[J].石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(6):682-686. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf200706008 [30] 程学峰.南阳凹陷核桃园组油气成藏规律研究与勘探潜力分析[D].北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2008. CNKI:CDMD:1.2008.068569 [31] 曾庆才.南阳凹陷油气成藏规律及勘探目标评价[D].北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10491-2008068570.htm [32] 罗家群, 蒲洪果, 李丽娟, 等.泌阳凹陷梨树凹区块油气成藏期次与成藏过程[J].地质科技情报, 2017, 36(3):118-121. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201703015 [33] 林社卿, 杨道庆, 夏东领, 等.泌阳凹陷油气运移输导体系特征及意义[J].江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(4):16-21. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jhsyxyxb200404005 [34] 尹伟, 吴胜和, 林社卿.双河油田油气成藏机理研究[J].石油学报, 2003, 24(5):40-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb200305009 [35] 夏东领, 尹伟, 李治.南襄盆地泌阳凹陷南部陡坡带油气成藏过程分析[J].石油实验地质, 2010, 32(3):247-256. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=sysydz201003009 [36] 程喆, 田世澄, 曾小阳, 等.泌阳凹陷下二门油田油气成藏机理研究[J].沉积学报, 2005, 23(2):346-352. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cjxb200502023 [37] 万能, 李书涛, 曾明中.滤波技术在武当-桐柏-大别成矿带地球化学异常提取中的应用[J].地质科技情报, 2015, 34(2):15-19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZKQ201502003.htm [38] 万卫, 汪明启, 谭杰.东秦岭斑岩型钼矿成矿带地质-地球化学找矿模式[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(4):30-38. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201804004 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(8) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 463
- PDF下载量: 735
- 被引次数: 0
