Seepage and stability of the colluvial landslide on the back hill of Qingshi Town Government under rainfall
-
摘要: 以黄冈地区青石镇政府后山堆积层滑坡为例，在分析了其工程地质特征及地质结构特征的基础上，采用有限元法研究了非饱和土瞬态体积含水量及孔隙水压力的分布，采用考虑孔隙水压力的Janbu法分析计算了降雨对堆积层滑坡安全系数的影响。研究结果表明：①降雨入渗导致坡体孔隙水压力升高，滑面抗剪强度降低，安全系数也随之逐渐降低，其中在降雨前期，两侧的抗剪强度下降速率比中部快，而到了后期中部的抗剪强度下降速率明显快于两侧；②安全系数变化表现为前19 d以0.008/d的速率缓慢下降，19~30 d以0.03/d的速率缓慢下降，30 d以后下降速度降低，至36 d之后不再发生变化，其中在0~11 d两侧抗剪强度变化对滑坡整体稳定性变化的贡献比中部大，19~36 d中部抗剪强度变化对滑坡整体稳定性变化的贡献要比两侧大；③降雨入渗过程中，地下水从坡体表层和两侧流向坡体中部，负孔压区面积向中部不断压缩，中部地下水变化受到两侧及上层的制约，体积含水量及孔隙水压力变化相对滞后；④该滑坡的防治重点是做好降雨前期坡体后缘地下水截流以及前缘地下水排泄工作，同时，做好地表排水，减少降雨入渗。Abstract: Taking the colluvial landslide of the back hill of Qingshi Town Government in Huanggang area as an example, this paper used finite element method to study the transient volumetric water content and pore water pressure of unsaturated soil based on the analysis of its engineering geological characteristics and geological structure characteristics.The Janbu method considering pore water pressure was used to calculate the effect of rainfall on the safety factor of the colluvial landslide. The results show that:①Rainfall infiltration leads to the increase of pore water pressure in the slope, and then the shear strength of the sliding surface to decrease, and so the safety factor decreases gradually. In the early stage of rainfall, the shear strength on both sides decreases faster than that in the central part. At the end of the period, the rate of decline in shear strength is significantly faster than that on both sides.②The change in safety factor shows a slow decline at the rate of 0.008/d for the first 19 d and a slow decrease at the rate of 0.03/d for 19-30 d. After 30 d, the descending speed decreases, and no change occurres after 36 d. Among them, the change of shear strength on both sides of 0-11 d contributes more to the change of overall stability than that of the central part. The contribution of shear strength change to the overall stability of 19-36 d is greater than that of the central part.③During the rainfall infiltration, groundwater flows from the surface and sides of the slope to the middle of the slope, and the negative pore water pressure area is continuously compressed to the central part. The groundwater changes in the central area are restricted by the two sides and the upper layer. The volumetric water content and the pore water pressure change are relatively lagging.④The prevention and control of the landslide is focused on the groundwater interception at the trailing edge of the slope and the groundwater discharge at the leading edge. At the same time, a good surface drainage may reduce rainfall infiltration.
-
Key words:
- colluvial landslide /
- rainfall /
- pore water pressure /
- shear strength /
- safety factor
-
图 1 滑坡体全貌(a)及工程地质平面图(b)
1.滑坡边界；2.裂缝；3.滑坡堆积体；4.太古宇大别山群；5.剖面线及编号；6.钻孔编号及高程(m)
Figure 1. Overall view of the landslide (a) and engineering geological plan (b)
图 3 Janbu法微分土条受力示意图
Wi为土条i的重力(kN)；Hi，Hi+1分别为土条i两侧的切向力；pi、pi+1分别为土条i的两侧法向力(kN)；θi为土条i滑面倾角(°)；Ni为土条i的支持力(kN); Ti为土条i的下滑力(kN)
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the differential force of the Janbu method
图 7 降雨3 d的数值模拟
a.降雨3 d后体积含水量分布; b.降雨3 d后孔隙水压力分布
Figure 7. Numerical simulation of rainfall 3 d
图 8 降雨11 d的数值模拟
a.降雨11 d后体积含水量分布; b.降雨11 d后孔隙水压力分布
Figure 8. Numerical simulation of rainfall 11 d
图 9 降雨19 d的数值模拟
a.降雨19 d后体积含水量分布; b.降雨19 d后孔隙水压力分布
Figure 9. Numerical simulation of rainfall 19 d
图 10 降雨36 d的数值模拟
a.降雨36 d后体积含水量分布; b降雨36 d后孔隙水压力分布
Figure 10. Numerical simulation of rainfall 36 d
图 11 降雨50 d的数值模拟
a.降雨50 d后体积含水量分布; b.降雨50 d后孔隙水压力分布
Figure 11. Numerical simulation of rainfall 50 d
图 12 体积含水量和孔隙水压力与降雨时间的关系
a.体积含水量与降雨时间的关系; b.孔隙水压力与降雨时间的关系
Figure 12. Volume moisture content and pore water pressure relationship with the rainfall time respectively
图 13 监测点所在条块抗剪强度随降雨时间的变化关系图
Figure 13. Relationship between shear strength of monitoring points and rainfall time
图 15 各时间段抗剪强度与安全系数的变化对照图
Figure 15. Comparison of changes in shear strength and safety factor for each time period
表 1 渗流计算参数
Table 1. Parameters of seepage calculation
位置 饱和体积含水量/(m3·m-3) 饱和渗透系数/(m·s-1) 滑体 0.4 1.0×10-6 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 岩土体物理力学参数
Table 2. Physical and mechanical parameters of rock and soil
岩性 重度/ (kN·m-3) 有效黏聚力/kPa 有效内摩擦角/(°) 吸力内摩擦角/(°) 粉质黏土夹碎石 20.1 21 24 15 中风化黑云斜长片麻岩 28.18 10 200 47
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 朱文慧, 陈金国, 邹浩, 等.基于滑坡特征统计研究黄冈市2016年汛期滑坡成因机理[J].资源环境与工程, 2018, 32(增刊1):89-92. https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_resources-environment-engineering_thesis/0201272212108.html [2] 邹浩, 陈金国, 吴恒, 等.2016年多轮强降雨影响下黄冈市地质灾害发育规律浅析[J].资源环境与工程, 2017, 31(6):764-768. [3] 贺可强, 周敦云, 王思敬.降雨型堆积层滑坡的加卸载响应比特征及其预测作用与意义[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(16):2665-2670. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.16.001 [4] 孙红月, 吕庆.堆积层滑坡成因机理与防治[M].北京:科学出版社, 2012. [5] 曾江波, 付智勇, 肖林超, 等.基于降雨作用下滑面抗剪强度动态变化的层状边坡稳定性评价[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(4):255-231. [6] 王腾飞, 李远耀, 曹颖, 等.降雨型浅层土质滑坡非饱和土-水作用特试验研究[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(6):181-188. [7] 李德营, 徐勇, 殷坤龙, 等.降雨型滑坡高速运动与堆积特征模拟研究:以宁乡县王家湾滑坡为例[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(4):225-230. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZKQ201904023.htm [8] 吴火珍, 冯美果, 焦玉勇, 等.降雨条件下堆积层滑坡体滑动机制分析[J].岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊1):324-329. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.z1.051 [9] 殷坤龙, 汪洋, 唐仲华.降雨型浅层滑坡危险性预测模型[J].地质科技情报, 2002, 21(1):75-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2012.02.019 [10] 汪丁建, 唐辉明, 李长冬, 等.强降雨作用下堆积层滑坡稳定性分析[J].岩土力学, 2016, 37(2):439-445. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.017 [11] 盛逸凡, 李远耀, 徐勇, 等.基于有效降雨强度和逻辑回归的降雨型滑坡预测模型[J].水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(1):156-162, 172. [12] 孙金山, 陈明, 左昌群, 等.降雨型浅层滑坡危险性预测模型[J].地质科技情报, 2012, 31(2):117-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2012.02.019 [13] 唐朝晖, 孔涛, 柴波.降雨作用碎石土堆积层滑坡变形规律[J].地质科技情报, 2012, 31(6):168-173. [14] 王述红, 何坚, 杨天娇.考虑降雨入渗的边坡稳定性数值分析[J].东北大学学报, 2018, 39(8):1196-1200. [15] Wang D J, Tang H M, Zhang Y H, et al.An improved approach for evaluating the time-dependent stability of colluvial landslides during intense rainfall[J].Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(8):321. [16] 汪斌, 唐辉明, 朱杰兵.库水作用下的滑坡渗流、力学与稳定性[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 2015. [17] Fredlund D G, Rahardjo H.非饱和土土力学[M].陈仲颐, 张在明, 陈愈炯, 等译.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1997. [18] 史玉成.软土的流变特性及三轴应力松弛试验仪的应用[J].岩土工程师, 1992, 4(1):1-6. http://www.ixueshu.com/document/e7a9973618dfb1d1d6dc88cb670d4d24318947a18e7f9386.html [19] Singh A, Mitchell J K.General stress-strain-time function for soils[J].Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(SM1):21-46. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=1bd8c6debf600b34c258c1fa99bf9b14&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [20] Mesri G, Retires-Cordero E, Shields D R, et al.Shear stress-strain-time behaviour of clays[J].Geotechnique, 1981, 31(4):537-552. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=aa5111ad0b64d321fdcc182ebc5cfd33&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [21] 李军世, 林咏梅.上海淤泥质黏土的Singh-Mitchell蠕变模型[J].岩土力学, 2000, 21(4):363-366. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2000.04.013 [22] Zhu J G, Yin J H.Drained creep behavior of soft Hong Kong marine deposites[J].Geotechnique, 2001, 51(5):471-474. doi: 10.1680/geot.2001.51.5.471 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 616
- PDF下载量: 693
- 被引次数: 0
