Numerical simulation of geothermal field in a three-dimensional multi-fractured geological model of Zhuolu Basin
-
摘要: 地温场预测是地热资源储量评价的重要前提，深部裂隙岩体渗流-传热耦合温度场研究正受到越来越多的关注。涿鹿盆地是新生代地堑式断陷盆地，地表温泉出露点多，地热资源丰富。依据实际地质调查结果和3条地球物理勘探测线解译的地质构造剖面，建立了矿场尺度的涿鹿盆地三维不平行多裂隙地质模型和地热成因模型，赋值调整参数，得到考虑地下水流动情况下多裂隙岩体渗流-传热数学模型，模型的合理性得到验证后，模拟计算了盆地内部温度场，指出盆地地热异常区集中在盆地中心蓟县系（70℃左右）和盆地北东长城系部位（90~98℃），最后研究分析了水力梯度的变化对盆地内部温度场的影响规律。研究结果为涿鹿盆地或同类型地区地热资源勘探、评价和开发利用提供一定的依据。Abstract: The prediction of the geothermal field is an important prerequisite for the evaluation of geothermal resources. Much attention has been paid to the research on coupled temperature field of percolation-heat transfer in deep fractured rock mass. The Zhuolu Basin is a graben-type faulted basin of the Cenozoic era. There are many hot springs on the surface and rich geothermal resources. In this paper, a three-dimensional non-parallel multi-fractured geological model of the Zhuolu Basin for large scale was established based on the actual geological survey results and the geological structure section interpreted by 3 geophysical survey lines. Parameters have been assigned or adjusted, a mathematical model of permeate-heat transfer in multi-fractured rock mass considering groundwater flow was obtained. After the model was verified, the internal temperature field of the basin was calculated and indicated. The geothermal anomaly area is concentrated in the center of the Jixian group (around 70℃) and the north- eastern part of the Changcheng group (90~98℃), the internal temperature field of basin have been analyzed at different hydraulic reaolients. The study results provide a certain basis for the exploration, evaluation, development and utilization of geothermal resources in Zhuolu Basin or similar areas.
-
Key words:
- geothermal field /
- geothermal resource /
- multi-fractured rock mass /
- seepage /
- heat transfer /
- numerical simulation
-
图 1 华北克拉通北缘及临区大地构造划分及涿鹿盆地地形地貌(图a据文献[20]修改)
Figure 1. Tectonic division of the northern margin of the North China Craton and adjacent areas and Topography of Zhuolu Basin
图 2 涿鹿盆地构造地质特征及A-B物探线剖面(据文献[27]修改绘制)
F1.怀涿盆地北缘断裂，F2.方家沟-西八里隐伏断裂，F3.桑干河隐伏断裂，F4.老君山山前隐伏断裂；F5、F6、F7.其他断裂；Q.第四纪，J.侏罗系，Qb.青白口系，Jx.蓟县系，Ch.长城系，Ar.桑干群
Figure 2. Characteristics of geological structure of Zhuolu Basin and A-B geophysical prospecting line section
图 3 三维不平行多裂隙地质模型的建立过程
Figure 3. Established three-dimensional non-parallel multi-fractured geological model
图 7 涿鹿盆地地热成因图
①地下水下渗后被岩石温度加热；②热流向凸起部位集中；③热流体沿断裂上涌；④岩溶裂隙地段局部对流
Figure 7. Origin of geothermal in Zhuolu Basin
图 9 局部截面温度场云图(x'表示裂隙F3的延伸方向)
Figure 9. Contour of local cross-section temperature field
图 11 垂向切面温度场云图
a.z=-50 m切面(侏罗系)温度场云图；b.z=-1 200 m切面(蓟县系)温度场云图；
c.z=-2 500 m切面(长城系)温度场云图；d.z=-3 000 m切面(长城系)温度场云图Figure 11. Contour of vertical section temperature field
图 12 地层温度-水力梯度关系曲线图
a.x=8 000 m, y=8 000 m, z=-100~2 500 m; b.x=10 000 m, y=9 000 m, z=-100~-2 500 m
Figure 12. Temperature-hydraulic gradient relation graph for formation
表 1 边界条件设置情况
Table 1. Boundary condition setting
边界条件类型 设置部位 大小 定压边界 模型的南西、北东边界中碳酸盐岩岩层沿桑干河流域(F2-F4之间)的边界 $ {H_0} = - {\rm{delta}}H \cdot \sqrt {{{\left[ {2.724\;96 \times \left( {x - 4\;422.59} \right)} \right]}^2} + {y^2}} $ 定温边界 侏罗系顶板 10℃ 热源边界 模型底界面 -0.059 mW/m2 开放边界 模型侧面 T_top+(550-z)×delta_Tz 注：T_top表示涿鹿县城常年平均地表温度；delta_Tz表示涿鹿盆地地温梯度 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 水文地质渗流物性参数及热物性参数
Table 2. Hydrogeological seepage physical property parameter and thermophysical property parameter
热储 岩体导热系数/W·(m·K)-1 渗透率/cm2 岩体比热/MJ·(m3·K)-1 岩体密度/(g·cm-3) 岩体恒压热容/J·(kg·K)-1 孔隙率 裂隙宽/m keff_x keff_y keff_z kx ky kz J 3.01 3.01 3.01 7.00×10-10 7.00×10-10 7.00×10-10 2.06 2.64 5 438.4 0.012 - Qb 3.66 3.66 3.66 8.00×10-10 8.00×10-10 8.00×10-10 1.58 2.54 4 013.2 0.013 - Jx 3.64 3.64 3.64 1.20×10-9 1.20×10-9 1.20×10-9 1.73 2.62 4 532.6 0.021 - Ch 3.33 3.33 3.33 1.50×10-9 1.50×10-9 1.50×10-9 1.72 2.57 4 420.4 0.021 - F1 1.51 2.51 2.51 1.20×10-10 1.20×10-8 1.20×10-8 1.35 0.82 1 107.0 0.180 135 F2 1.23 2.23 2.23 1.00×10-10 1.00×10-8 1.00×10-8 1.45 0.65 942.5 0.210 140 F3 1.41 2.41 2.41 1.50×10-10 1.50×10-8 1.50×10-8 1.36 0.59 802.4 0.150 130 F4 1.15 2.15 2.15 1.30×10-10 1.30×10-8 1.30×10-8 1.28 0.64 819.2 0.230 138 注：keff_x、keff_y、keff_z分别表示x、y、z 3个方向的导热系数；kx、ky、kz分别表示x、y、z 3个方向的渗透率
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 汪集暘. 地热学及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.Wang J Y. Geothermics and its applications[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015(in Chinese with English abstract). [2] 自然资源部中国地质调查局, 国家能源局新能源和可再生能源司, 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院. 中国地热能发展报告(2018)[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2018: 5-8.China Geological Survey, National Energy Administration, Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences. China Geothermal Energy Development Report (2018)[M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press CO. LTD, 2018: 5-8(in Chinese with English abstract). [3] Reed M H, Spycher N F. Calculation of pH and mineral equilibria in hydrothermal water with application to geothermometer and studies of boiling and dilution[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1984, 48: 1479-1492. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(84)90404-6 [4] 郑西来, 刘鸿俊. 地热温标中的水-岩平衡状态研究[J]. 西安地质学院学报, 1996, 8(1): 74-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX601.014.htmZheng X L, Liu H J. Study of the water-rock equilibrium state in the application of geothermometer[J]. Journal of Xi'an College of Geology, 1996, 8(1): 74-79(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX601.014.htm [5] 吴红梅, 孙占学. 地热系统中矿物-流体化学平衡的计算[J]. 华东地质学院学报, 2000, 23(1): 39-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2000.01.009Wu H M, Sun Z X. Calculation of the fluid-rock equilibrium state in the geothermal system[J]. Journal of East China Geological Institute, 2000, 23(1): 39-42(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2000.01.009 [6] Dowdle W L, Cobb W M. Static formation temperature from Well Logs-An empirical method[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1975, 27(1): 1326-1330. [7] Liu C W, Li K W, Chen Y G, et al. Static formation temperature prediction based on bottom hole temperature[J]. Energies, 2016, 9(8): 1-14. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/doaj/19961073/2016/00000009/00000008/art00043 [8] 周训, 陈明佑, 梁池生. 地下热水运移数学模型简介[J]. 地质科技情报, 2002, 21(1): 47-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2002.01.011Zhou X, Chen M Y, Liang C S. A brief review on mathematical models to describe geothermal water flow and heat transport[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2002, 21(1): 47-50(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2002.01.011 [9] 李馨馨, 李典庆, 徐轶. 地热对井系统裂隙岩体三维渗流传热耦合的等效模拟方法[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(7): 238-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201907027.htmLi X X, Li D Q, Xiu Y. Equivalent simulation method of three-dimensional seepage and heat transfer coupling in fractured rock mass of geothermal-borehole system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(7): 238-247(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201907027.htm [10] 朱红光, 易成, 谢和平, 等. 基于立方定律的岩体裂隙非线性流动几何模型[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(4): 822-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201604004.htmZhu H G, Yi C, Xie H P, et al. A new geometric model for non-linear flow in rough-walled fractures based on the cubic law[J]. Jouanal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(4): 822-828(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201604004.htm [11] 许光祥, 张永兴, 哈秋舲. 粗糙裂隙渗流的超立方和次立方定律及其试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2003, 34(3): 74-79. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2003.03.014Xu G X, Zhang Y X, Ha Q L. Super-cubic and sub-cubic law of rough fracture seepage and its experiments study[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 34(3): 74-79(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0559-9350.2003.03.014 [12] 高瑜, 叶咸, 夏强. 基于等效连续介质模型的单裂隙渗流数值模拟研究[J]. 地下水, 2016, 38(5): 40-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2016.05.016Gao Y, Ye X, Xia Q. Numerical simulation study of single-fracture seepage flow based on equivalent continuum model[J]. Ground Water, 2016, 38(5): 40-43(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2016.05.016 [13] 单丹丹, 闫铁, 李玮, 等. 单裂隙热储热流耦合数值模拟分析[J]. 当代化工, 2020, 49(4): 716-719, 723. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0460.2020.04.052Shan D D, Yan T, Li W, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of thermal-hydraulic coupling in a single-fracture thermal reservoir[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(4): 716-719, 723(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0460.2020.04.052 [14] 张树光, 李志建, 徐义洪, 等. 裂隙岩体流-热耦合传热的三维数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(8): 2507-2511. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.08.042Zhang S G, Li Z J, Xu Y H, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation and analysis of fluid-heat coupling heat-transfer in fractured rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(8): 2507-2511(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.08.042 [15] 柯婷婷, 黄少鹏, 许威, 等. 关中盆地沣西地区地热对井采灌开发模式的数值模拟[J]. 第四纪研究, 2019, 39(5): 1252-1263. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/dsjyj201905018Ke T T, Huang S P, Xu W, et al. Numerical modeling of doublet well system for extracting heat from sandstone geothermal reservoir: A case study of Fengxi area, the Guanzhong Basin, NW China[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2019, 39(5): 1252-1263(in Chinese with English abstract). https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/dsjyj201905018 [16] 杜广林, 周维垣, 赵吉东. 裂隙介质中的多重裂隙网络渗流模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2000, 19(增刊1): 1014-1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2000S1041.htmDu G L, Zhou W H, Zhao J D. Multiple fracture network seepage model for fractured media[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 19(S1): 1014-1018(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2000S1041.htm [17] 翟海珍, 苏正, 凌璐璐, 等. 平行多裂隙模型中换热单元体对EGS釆热的影响[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31(3): 1399-1405. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201603063.htmZhai H Z, Su Z, Ling L L, et al. Impact of heat transfer unit on EGS heat extraction in the multi-parallel fracture model[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2016, 31(3): 1399-1405(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201603063.htm [18] 肖鹏, 闫飞飞, 窦斌, 等. 增强型地热系统水平井平行多裂隙换热过程数值模拟[J]. 可再生能源, 2019, 37(7): 1091-1099. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5292.2019.07.024Xiao P, Yan F F, Dou B, et al. Numerical simulation on the heat transfer process of parallel multi-fractures in enhanced geothermal system horizontal well[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2019, 37(7): 1091-1099(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5292.2019.07.024 [19] 李海波. CSAMT法在地热资源勘探中的应用[J]. 煤炭技术, 2020, 39(7): 57-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTJS202007017.htmLi H B. Application of CSAMT in geothermal Resources Exploration[J]. Coal Technology, 2020, 39(7): 57-58(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTJS202007017.htm [20] Xiao W J, Windley B F. Accretion leading to collision and the Permian Solonker suture, Inner Mongolia, China: Termination of the central Asian orogenic belt[J]. Tectonics, 2003, 22(6), 1069-1089. http://petrology.oxfordjournals.org/external-ref?access_num=10.1029/2002TC001484&link_type=DOI [21] 谢富仁, 张红艳, 崔效锋, 等. 延怀盆地活动断裂运动与现代构造应力场[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(4): 693-705. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.04.001Xie F R, Zhang H Y, Cui X F, et al. Active fault movement and recent tectonic stress field in Yanhuai basin[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2007, 29(4): 693-705(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2007.04.001 [22] 李英康, 高锐, 姚聿涛, 等. 华北克拉通北缘-西伯利亚板块南缘的地壳速度结构特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(2): 484-497. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201402014.htmLi Y K, Gao R, Yao J T, et al. Crustal velocity structure from the northern margin of the North China Craton to the southern margin of the Siberian plate[J]. Chinese journal of geophysics, 2014, 57(2): 484-497(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201402014.htm [23] 张文朋, 申旭辉, 曹忠权, 等. 桑干河阳原-涿鹿段地貌演化[J]. 地震, 2011, 31(4): 108-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201104011.htmZhang W P, Shen X H, Cao Z Q, et al. Geomorphic evolution of the Yangyuan-Zhuolu section of Sanggan river, in Shanxi province[J]. Earthquake, 2011, 31(4): 108-117(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN201104011.htm [24] 智小军. 张家口坝下地区地下热水赋存规律研究[J]. 地下水, 2016, 38(3): 10-11, 75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXSU201603004.htmZhi X J. Research on underground hot water occurrence regularity in Zhangjiakou dam area[J]. Ground Water, 2016, 38(3): 10-11, 75(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXSU201603004.htm [25] 姬广军, 朱吉祥. 三维地质建模技术研究现状[J]. 科技风, 2019(10): 109-110, 122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJFT201910098.htmJi G J, Zhu J X. Research status of 3D geological modeling technology[J]. Technology Wind, 2019(10): 109-110, 122(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJFT201910098.htm [26] 张亮, 姚磊华, 王迎东. 基于COMSOL Multiphysics的三维地质建模方法[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2014, 42(6): 14-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.06.003Zhang L, Yao L H, Wang Y D. 3D geological modeling method based on COMSOL Multiphysics[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2014, 42(6): 14-19(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.06.003 [27] 郭亚亚. 怀涿盆地活动断层特征及地震活动探讨[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄经济学院, 2014: 15-17.Gou Y Y. Characteristics of active fault and studies on seismic activity in Huaizhuo Basin[D]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang University of Economics, 2014: 15-17(in Chinese with English abstract). [28] 孙鹏飞, 苏伟杰. 涿怀盆地地下水补排平衡分析计算[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2016, 22(4): 69-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2016.04.025Sun P F, Su W J. Analysis and calculation of groundwater recharge and discharge balance in Zhuohuai Basin[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2016, 22(4): 69-70(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2016.04.025 [29] 陈必光. 地热对井裂隙岩体中渗流传热过程数值模拟方法研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.Chen B G. Study on numerical methods for coupled fluid flow and heat transfer in fractured rocks of doublet system[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2014(in Chinese with English abstract). [30] 吴涛, 李港. 幂律流体在裂缝-孔隙双重多孔介质中渗流的分形模型[J/OL]. (2020-5-27) [2021-03-28] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1178.N.20200527.1214.004.html.Wu T, Li G. A fractal model of permeability for power-law fluids in porous fracture dual media[J/OL]. (2020-5-27) [2021-03-28] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1178.N.20200527.1214.004.html(in Chinese with English abstract). [31] 王统, 田宜平, 罗莹莹, 等. 基于地质大数据与构造语义约束的断层建模[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(4): 69-75. http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10001.shtmlWang T, Tian Y P, Luo Y Y, et al. Fault modeling based on the semantic constraint of geological big data[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(4): 69-75(in Chinese with English abstract). http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10001.shtml [32] 陈国旭, 田宜平, 张夏林, 等. 基于勘探剖面的三维地质模型快速构建及不确定性分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2): 275-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902033.htmChen G X, Tian Y P, Zhang X L. Rapid construction and uncertainty analysis of 3D geological models based on exploration Sections[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(2): 275-280(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902033.htm [33] 张文彪, 段太忠, 刘彦锋, 等. 定量地质建模技术应用现状与发展趋势[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201903029.htmZhang W B, Duan T Z, Liu Y F, et al. Application status and development trend of quantitative geological modeling[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(3): 1-9(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201903029.htm [34] 胡华斌, 田立富, 孙黎明. 河北怀来-涿鹿盆地更新世岩石地层和生物地层特征及时代[J]. 中国区域地质, 2000, 19(2): 137-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2000.02.005Hu H B, Tian L F, Sun L M. Characteristics and ages of the Pleistocene lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy in the Huailai-Zhuolu basin, Hebei[J]. Regional Geology of China, 2000, 19(2): 137-143(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2000.02.005 [35] 祖金华, 吴乾蕃, 廉雨方. 延庆-怀来盆地及其邻区地热研究[J]. 地震学报, 1997, 19(4): 442-444. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB704.013.htmZu J H, Wu Q F, Lian Y F. Geothermal research in Yanqing-Huilai Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1997, 19(4): 442-444(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB704.013.htm [36] 黄晶. 内部惩罚间断伽辽金方法求解时域流固耦合问题[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2017.Huang J. Interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin method solving time-domain fluid-solid interaction problem[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017(in Chinese with English abstract). [37] 王贵玲, 张薇, 蔺文静, 等. 京津冀地区地热资源成藏模式与潜力研究[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(6): 1074-1085. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201706004.htmWang G L, Zhang W, Ling W J. Research on formation mode and development potential of geothermal resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Geology in China, 2017, 44(6): 1074-1085(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201706004.htm [38] 李朋威, 何治亮, 罗平, 等. 华北北部地区蓟县系高于庄组-雾迷山组白云岩储层特征与形成主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 26-36, 49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202001004.htmLi P W, He Z L, Luo P, et al. Characteristics of and main factors controlling the dolomite reservoir of Gaoyuzhuang-Wumishan Formations in the Jixian System, the north of North China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 26-36, 49(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202001004.htm [39] 雷晓东, 裴艳东, 关伟, 等. 北京地区岩石地层密度特征及界面划分[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(3): 836-844. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ202003004.htmLei X D, Pei Y D, Guang W, et al. Characteristics of Lithostratigraphic Density and its interface division in Beijing Area[J]. Progress in Geophsics, 2020, 35(3): 836-844(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ202003004.htm [40] 齐晓飞, 张国斌, 上官拴通, 等. 河北省干热岩地热资源赋存分布研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2018, 30(11): 47-54, 73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2018.11.11Qi X F, Zhang G B, Shangguan S T, et al. A brief analysis of hot and dry rock geothermal resources hosting and distribution in Hebei province[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2018, 30(11): 47-54, 73(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2018.11.11 [41] 雷晓东, 胡圣标, 李娟, 等. 北京地区基岩地层热物性参数特征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(5): 1814-1823. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201805007.htmLei X D, Hu S B, Li J, et al. Thermal properties analysis of bedrock in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(5): 1814-1823(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201805007.htm [42] 王树芳, 庞忠和, 何铁柱, 等. 北京地区碳酸盐岩热储渗透性研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(4): 647-654. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ201404013.htmWang S F, Pang Z H, He T Z, et al. Study on the permeability of carbonate rock geothermal reservoir in Beijing[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2014, 22(4): 647-654(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ201404013.htm [43] 刘明清, 刘敏. 延庆、怀来地区地壳深部磁性构造与地震的研究[J]. 华北地震科学, 1994, 12(3): 53-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD403.006.htmLiu M Q, Liu M. A study of relation between magnetic structure in deep crust of Yanqing, Huailai areas and seismicity[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1994, 12(3): 53-58(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD403.006.htm [44] 王朱亭, 张超, 姜光政, 等. 雄安新区现今地温场特征及成因机制[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(11): 4313-4322. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0326Wang Z T, Zhang C, Jiang G Z, et al. Present-day geothermal field of Xiongan New Area and its heat source mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(11): 4313-4322(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0326 [45] 张进平. 浅析北京市延庆区西北部地热地质特征[J]. 城市地质, 2019, 14(1): 26-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1903.2019.01.005Zhang J P. Analysis on Geothermal Geology Characteristics in the Northwest of Yanqing District, Beijing[J]. Urban Geology, 2019, 14(1): 26-33(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1903.2019.01.005 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(12) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 882
- PDF下载量: 724
- 被引次数: 0
