库水位升降与降雨作用下大型滑坡体渗流稳定性分析

唐军峰; 唐雪梅; 肖鹏; 王航; 李佳武

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0409

库水位升降与降雨作用下大型滑坡体渗流稳定性分析

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0409

唐军峰^1,,
唐雪梅^1, ,,
肖鹏²,
王航²,
李佳武²

基金项目:

国家电力投资集团五凌电力自主创新项目 320035FW0420180010

中国电建集团中南勘测设计研究院自主创新项目 YFHT-1856

详细信息

作者简介:
唐军峰(1977-), 男, 正高级工程师, 主要从事岩土工程方面的设计与科研工作。E-mail: 184683801@qq.com

通讯作者:
唐雪梅(1976-), 女, 副教授, 主要从事岩土工程方面的科研和教学工作。E-mail: 394693080@qq.com

中图分类号: P642.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 917
- PDF下载量: 539
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-12-04

Analysis of seepage stability of large-scale landslide under water-level fluctuation and rainfall

摘要

摘要: 库岸滑坡体分布广泛，在库水位升降和降雨条件下极易失稳。三板溪水电站东岭信滑坡堆积体总方量2 000×10⁴ m³，最大厚度150 m，2006年水电站蓄水后滑坡体开始出现大变形，每年雨季加剧。首先经野外地质勘察和十余年监测数据整理，探明了地质条件和变形规律；其次使用SEEP/W模块对不同库水位升降速率、2019年库水位结合实测降雨条件下的饱和-非饱和流进行模拟，并采用SLOPE/W分别计算不同时刻的稳定系数。分析认为东岭信为超深层滑坡，其变形过程深受库水位升降和降雨影响；滑坡体具有明显的滞水特征，渗流过程复杂；在库水位上升过程中稳定系数不断下降，而在库水位消落过程中稳定性逐渐增强；在库水位上升和强降雨量共同作用下稳定性下降很快，汛后10 d左右达到最低值，此时的稳定性最差。本研究可用于指导库水位升降和降雨条件下大型滑坡体稳定性评价。
- 大型滑坡堆积体 /
- 降雨 /
- 库水位升降 /
- 渗透特征 /
- 稳定性
Abstract: Landslide is widely distributed on the bank of the reservoir, which is easy to cause instability under the condition of water level fluctuation and rainfall.Donglingxin landslide accumulation body of the Sanbanxi Hydropower Station has a maximum thickness of 150 m and a total volume of 2 000×10⁴ m³.The slope began to show large deformation at the first impoundment of the hydropower station in 2006, and the deformation is accelerated at the annual rainy season.Firstly, based on the field geological investigation and over ten years of monitoring data, the geological conditions and deformation law of the landslide body were obtained.Secondly, the saturated-unsaturated flow was calculated with different reservoir water levels fluctuation rates and the measured reservoir water level together with rainfall in 2019 by SEEP/W, and SLOPE/W was used to calculate the stability factors at different time.Results show that the slope is a super-deep landslide, which deformation process was deeply affected by the rise and fall of the reservoir water level and rainfall; The slope has characteristics of stagnant water, and the seepage process is complex; The stability coefficient decreases continuously in the process of reservoir water level rising while increases gradually in the process of reservoir water level falling; The stability declines rapidly with the combined effect of rising reservoir water level and heavy rainfall, and reaches the lowest value about 10 days after the flood season.The research can be used to guide the stability evaluation of large-scale landslide under water-level fluctuation and rainfall.
- large-scale landslide accumulation body /
- rainfall /
- water level fluctuation /
- seepage properties /
- stability

HTML全文

图 1 东岭信滑坡工程地质平面图

Figure 1. Engineering geological plane of Donglingxin landslide

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 东岭信滑坡剖面

Figure 2. Profile of Donglingxin landslide

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 东岭信滑坡后缘裂缝

Figure 3. Cracks at the back of Donglingxin landslide

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 地表位移、库水位与降雨量关系

Figure 4. Relationship of surface displacement with the reservoir water level and rainfall

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 排水洞内揭露的滑面及擦痕

Figure 5. Sliding surface and sliding scratch in drainage tunnels

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 裂缝变形及地下水位关系曲线

Figure 6. Relationship between crack deformation and groundwater level

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 排水洞流量与降雨量

Figure 7. Relationship between discharge of drainage tunnels and rainfall

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 土水特征曲线

Figure 8. curve of soil-water characteristics

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 渗透系数

Figure 9. Penetration function curve of covering layer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同库水位上升速率时滑坡体内地下水位的变化

a.上升速率为3×10^-6 m/s(0.26 m/d，169.8 d)；b.上升速率为6×10^-6 m/s(0.52 m/d，84.9 d)；c.上升速率为9×10^-6 m/s(0.78 m/d，56.6 d)

Figure 10. Changes of groundwater level with different reservoir water level rising rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同库水位下降速率时滑坡体内地下水位的变化

a.下降升速率为3×10^-6 m/s(0.26 m/d，169.8 d); b.下降速率为6×10^-6 m/s(0.52 m/d，84.9 d); c.下降速率为9×10^-6 m/s(0.78 m/d，56.6 d)

Figure 11. Changes of groundwater level with different reservoir water level dropping rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 不同库水位升降速率时的稳定系数

a.库水位上升；b.库水位下降

Figure 12. Stability factors with different water level fluctuation rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 2019年汛期GPS位移监测与库水位变化和降雨量关系(GPS监测始于2019年初)

Figure 13. Relationship between GPS displacement monitoring and water level and rainfall in 2019 flood season

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 2019年汛期前后坡体渗流场及稳定系数

Figure 14. Seepage field and stability factors of the slope in 2019 flood season

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 2019年汛期稳定系数与实测地下水位

Figure 15. Slope stability factors and the monitoring groundwater level in 2019 flood season

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 东岭信滑坡堆积体岩土体参数取值

Table 1. Parameters of rock and soil mass of Donglingxin landslide deposit

岩土分类	天然重度/(kN·m^-3)	饱和重度/(kN·m^-3)	渗透系数/(m·s^-1)	抗剪强度		饱和体积含水率/%
岩土分类	天然重度/(kN·m^-3)	饱和重度/(kN·m^-3)	渗透系数/(m·s^-1)	c/kPa	φ/(°)	饱和体积含水率/%
滑体	22.0	22.5	1×10^-4	80	33.0	22
滑带	20.3	20.8	3×10^-5	23	29.4	34
基岩	26.8	27.6	1×10^-9	2 000	45.0	-

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	王志旺, 杨健, 张保军, 等. 水库库岸滑坡稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(11): 1837-1840. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2004.11.034 Wang Z W, Yang J, Zhang B J, et al. Study on stability of landslide of reservoir area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(11): 1837-1841(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2004.11.034
[2]	杜伯辉. 柘溪水库塘岩光滑坡: 我国首例水库蓄水初期诱发的大型滑坡[C]//佚名. 第二届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集: 上册. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006. Du B H. Tangyanguang landslide of Zhexi reservoir: The first large-scale landslide occurred at early stage of impoundment in China[C]//Anon. Proceedings of the second national congress on geotechnology and engineering(Volume 1). Beijing: Science Press, 2006(in Chinese).
[3]	Genevois R, Ghirotti M. The 1963 vaiont landslide[J]. Landslides Types, 2005, 1(1): 41-52.
[4]	许强, 郑光, 李为乐, 等. 2018年10月和11月金沙江白格两次滑坡堰塞堵江事件分析研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 26(6): 1534-1551. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ201806016.htm Xu Q, Zheng G, Li W L, et al. Study on successive landslide damming events of Jinsha River in Baige village on October 11 and November 3, 2018[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 26(6): 1534-1551(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ201806016.htm
[5]	刘磊, 殷坤龙, 徐勇, 等. 考虑降雨及库水位变动的区域滑坡灾害稳定性评价研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(2): 403-414. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201802014.htm Liu L, Yin K L, Xu Y, et al. Evaluation of regional landslide stability considering rainfall and reservoir water level change[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(2): 403-414(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201802014.htm
[6]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 宋亮, 等. 降雨和库水位联合作用下库岸滑坡模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4361-4370. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201911027.htm Jiang Q Q, Jiao Y Y, Song L, et al. Experimental study on reservoir landslide under rainfall and water-level fluctuation[J]. Rock and Rock Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4361-4370(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201911027.htm
[7]	董金玉, 杨继红, 孙文怀, 等. 库水位升降作用下大型堆积体边坡变形破坏预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(6): 1774-1780. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.06.029 Dong J Y, Yang J H, Sun W H, et al. Prediction of deformation and failure of a large-scale deposit slope during reservoir waterlevel fluctuation[J]. Rock and Rock Mechanics, 2011, 32(6): 1774-1780(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.06.029
[8]	吴琼, 唐辉明, 王亮清, 等. 库水位升降联合降雨作用下库岸边坡中的浸润线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(10): 3025-3031. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.10.024 Wu Q, Tang H M, Wang L Q, et al. Analysis solutions for phreatic line in reservoir slope with inclined impervious bed under rainfall and reservoir water level fluctuation[J]. Rock and Rock Mechanics, 2009, 30(10): 3025-3031(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.10.024
[9]	王腾飞, 李远耀, 曹颖, 等. 降雨型浅层土质滑坡非饱和土-水作用特征试验研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 36(6): 181-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201906022.htm Wang T F, Li Y Y, Cao Y, et al. Experimental study on unsaturated soil-water interaction characteristics of rainfall-type shallow soil landslide[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 36(6): 181-188(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201906022.htm
[10]	Guia M W, Wub Y M. Failure of soil under water infiltration condition[J]. Engineering Geology, 2014, 181: 124-141. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.005
[11]	Cho S E, Lee S R. Instability of unsaturated soil slopes due to infiltration[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2001, 28: 185-208. doi: 10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00027-6
[12]	卢操, 晏鄂川, 张瑜, 等. 降雨作用下青石镇政府后山堆积层滑坡渗流与稳定性[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(2): 139-147. n/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202002016.htm 卢操, 晏鄂川, 张瑜, 等. 降雨作用下青石镇政府后山堆积层滑坡渗流与稳定性[J]. 地质科技 Lu C, Yan E C, Zhang Y, et al. Seepage and stability of the colluvial landslide on the back hill of Qingshi Town Government under rainfall[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(2): 139-147(in Chinese with English abstract). n/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202002016.htm 卢操, 晏鄂川, 张瑜, 等. 降雨作用下青石镇政府后山堆积层滑坡渗流与稳定性[J]. 地质科技
[13]	Montrasoi L, Valentino R, Losi G L. Rainfall-induced shallow landslides: A model for the triggering mechanism of some case studies in Northern Italy[J]. Landslides, 2009, 6(3): 241-251. doi: 10.1007/s10346-009-0154-7
[14]	Gerscovich D M S, Vargas E A, de Campos T M P. On the evaluation of unsaturated flow in a natural slope in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 88: 23-40. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.07.008
[15]	文海家, 张岩岩, 付红梅, 等. 降雨型滑坡失稳机理及稳定性评价方法研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(2): 15-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.02.002 Wen H J, Zhang Y Y, Fu H M, et al. Research status of instability mechanism of rainfall-induced landslide and stability evaluation mechods[J]. China J. Highw. Transp., 2018, 31(2): 15-29(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.02.002
[16]	唐军峰, 唐雪梅, 曾向农, 等. 蓄水后库岸堆积体边坡变形特征及稳定性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2018, 48(5): 1546-1555. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201805048.htm Tang J F, Tang X M, Zeng X N, et al. Deformation characteristics and stability analysis of deposit slope after initial impoundment[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2018, 48(5): 1546-1555(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201805048.htm
[17]	肖建龙, 唐军峰, 谢尚智. 三板溪水电站库区东岭信滑坡堆积体综合分析报告[R]. 长沙: 中国电建集团中南勘测设计研究院有限公司, 2017. Xiao J L, Tang J F, Xie S Z. Comprehensive analysis report on the accumulation body of Donglingxin landslide in the reservoir area of Sanbanxi Hydropower Station[R]. Changsha: Power China Zhongnan Engineering Corporation Limited, 2017(in Chinese).
[18]	白永健, 倪化勇, 葛华. 青藏高原东南缘活动断裂地质灾害效应研究现状[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019, 25(6): 1116-1128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201906030.htm Bai Y J, Ni H Y, Ge H. Advances in research on the geohazard effect of active faults on the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2019, 25(6): 1116-1128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201906030.htm
[19]	Wang G, Sassa K. Pore-pressure generation and movement of rainfall induced landslides: Effect of grain size and fine-particle content[J]. Engineering Geology, 2003, 69: 109-125. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00268-5
[20]	Kim J, Jeong S, Park S, et al. Influence of rainfall induced wetting on the stability of slopes in weathered soils[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 75: 251-262. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.06.017