留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于深度生成模型的河道砂建模方法

高小洋 何文祥 胡勇

高小洋, 何文祥, 胡勇. 基于深度生成模型的河道砂建模方法[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2): 94-104. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0208
引用本文: 高小洋, 何文祥, 胡勇. 基于深度生成模型的河道砂建模方法[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2): 94-104. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0208
Gao Xiaoyang, He Wenxiang, Hu Yong. A modeling method of channel sand based on deep generation models[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2): 94-104. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0208
Citation: Gao Xiaoyang, He Wenxiang, Hu Yong. A modeling method of channel sand based on deep generation models[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2): 94-104. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0208

基于深度生成模型的河道砂建模方法

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0208
详细信息
    作者简介:

    高小洋(1995-), 男, 现正攻读矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位, 主要从事地球化学和人工智能地质建模研究工作。E-mail: 18734311896@163.com

    通讯作者:

    胡勇(1980-), 男, 副教授, 主要从事油藏沉积学和地质建模研究工作。E-mail: 64421847@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: P628

A modeling method of channel sand based on deep generation models

  • 摘要:

    在传统的河道砂体建模方法中,基于目标建模的方法难以条件化,多点地质统计学难以再现连续河道砂体的形态,导致建模成果难以直接应用于油田生产。深度生成模型通过深度学习,可以生成足够精确的河道砂体模型,能再现复杂的河道砂体形态,很好地满足井点条件,弥补了传统建模算法的不足。在建模过程中,首先基于目标模拟方法与计算机匹配操作建立了20 000个河道砂体模型与对应的条件集,并结合变分自编码(VAE)与生成对抗网络(GAN)的理论,建立深度生成模型,其中包括分类器、编码器、解码器与判别器。将条件数据与真实模型输入深度生成模型中得到对应的河道砂体模型,通过大量的训练建立了可以生成满足井点条件的河道砂体的生成器,最后将井点数据输入生成器中建立相应的河道砂体模型。研究结果表明,深度生成模型建模算法与传统建模算法相比不仅展现出了连续、清晰的河道砂体,并且在给定的条件下可以生成多个河道砂体模型。该建模方法克服了传统河道砂建模方法的不足,为河道砂体储层建模提供了新的解决思路,建立的河道模型可为油田开发提供参考。

     

  • 图 1  VAE结构图(实线表示生成模型,虚线表示变分近似)

    z.隐变量;x.可观测量;Ф.变分近似的相关参数;θ.生成模型的相关参数;N.样本数

    Figure 1.  VAE structural diagram

    图 2  GAN结构图

    Figure 2.  GAN structural diagram

    图 3  深度生成模型训练过程

    Figure 3.  Training process of the deep generative model

    图 4  随机生成的河道砂体模型数据集(此处只显示了16个模型的数据)

    Figure 4.  Randomly generated data set of channel sand body model

    图 5  输入训练的条件集

    Figure 5.  Condition set of input training

    图 6  用于测试的井点图

    Figure 6.  Well point diagram for testing

    图 7  条件数据与河道模型通过one_hot特征进行连接

    Figure 7.  Conditional data and channel model are connected through one_hot features

    图 8  编码器E与解码器G的结构图

    Figure 8.  Structural diagram of Encoder E and Decoder G

    图 9  分类器C1、C2损失函数变化曲线

    Figure 9.  Variation curve of loss function of the classifier C1, C2

    图 10  深度生成模型损失函数

    Figure 10.  Loss function of the deep generative model

    图 11  训练精度(a)和测试精度(b)变化曲线

    Figure 11.  Change curve of training accuracy (a) and testing accuracy (b)

    图 12  生成的模型

    Figure 12.  Generated model

    图 13  训练不同的迭代次数生成的河道砂体模型

    Figure 13.  Training different numbers of epochs to generate the channel sand body model

    图 14  VAE生成的河道砂体模型

    Figure 14.  Channel sand body model generated by the VAE

    图 15  基于目标模拟生成的河道砂体模型

    Figure 15.  Channel model generated based on target simulation

    图 16  多点统计生成的河道砂体模型

    Figure 16.  Channel sand body model generated by multipoint statistics

  • [1] 束青林. 河道砂储层油藏动态模型和剩余油预测[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004.

    Shu Q L. Reservoir performance model and remaining oil prediction of channel sand reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004(in Chinese).
    [2] 李勤, 张利锋, 孙丽. 遗传模拟退火算法在储层属性建模中的应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005(1): 31-32, 106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.01.009

    Li Q, Zhang L F, Sun L. Influence of asphaltene deposition on oil seepage characteristics[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005(1): 31-32, 106(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.01.009
    [3] 陈建阳, 于兴河, 张志杰, 等. 储层地质建模在油藏描述中的应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005(3): 17-18, 104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.03.006

    Chen J Y, Yu X H, Zhang Z J, et al. Application of reservoir modeling in reservoir description of Baolige Oil Field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005(3): 17-18, 104(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.03.006
    [4] 徐伟, 房磊, 刘钧, 等. 浅层高渗砂岩油藏分级相控地质建模[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(1): 197-201. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201701024.htm

    Xu W, Fang L, Liu J, et al. Hierarchic facies-constrained geological modeling of shallow high permeability sandy reservoir[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2017, 36(1): 197-201(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201701024.htm
    [5] 付志国, 石成方, 赵翰卿, 等. 喇萨杏油田河道砂岩厚油层夹层分布特征[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2007(4): 55-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2007.04.013

    Fu Z G, Shi C F, Zhao H Q, et al. The distribution characteristics of interlayer in thick channel sand oil reservoir in Lasaxing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007(4): 55-58(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2007.04.013
    [6] 舒志华, 张立有, 刘刚. 复合砂体中单一河道的识别方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2006(4): 18-20, 120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2006.04.007

    Shu Z H, Zhang L Y, Liu G. Identification of single channel in compound sand body[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2006(4): 18-20, 120(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2006.04.007
    [7] 赵翰卿. 高分辨率层序地层对比与我国的小层对比[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005(1): 5-9, 12-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.01.002

    Zhao H Q. High-resolution sequential stratigraphy correlation and Chinese subzone correlation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005(1): 5-9, 12-105(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.01.002
    [8] 何宇航, 于开春. 分流平原相复合砂体单一河道识别及效果分析[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005(2): 17-19, 104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.02.006

    He Y H, Yu K C. Single channel identification and effect analysis of compound sand body in distributary plain facies[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005(2): 17-19, 104(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.02.006
    [9] 沈华, 尹微, 徐佑平. 提高砂岩油藏储层预测精度的方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2005(3): 24-27, 104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.03.009

    Shen H, Yin W, Xu Y P. Improving predicting accuracy of sandstone oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2005(3): 24-27, 104(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2005.03.009
    [10] Haldorsen H H, Chang D M. Notes on stochastic shales from outcrop to simulation models[C]//Lake L W, Carol H B. Reservoir characterization. New York, USA: Academic Press, 1986: 152-167.
    [11] Haldorsen H H, Damsleth E. Stochastic modelling[J]. J. Pet. Technol., 1990, 42(4): 404-412. doi: 10.2118/20321-PA
    [12] Holden L, Hauge R, Skare O, et al. Modeling of fluvial reservoirs with object models[J]. Math. Geol., 1998, 30: 473-496.
    [13] Strebelle S B, Journel A G. Reservoir modeling using multiple-point statistics[C]//Anon. SPE Paper 71324 Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in New Orleans, Louisiana, 2001: 1-11.
    [14] Strebelle S B. Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics[J]. Math. Geol., 2002, 34: 1-21. doi: 10.1023/A:1014009426274
    [15] Mariethoz G, Renard P, Straubhaar J. The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations[J]. Water Resour. Res., 2010, 46: 11536
    [16] Rezaee H, Marcotte D, Tahmasebi P, et al. Multiple-point geostatistical simulation using enriched pattern databases[J]. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 2015, 29: 893-913. doi: 10.1007/s00477-014-0964-6
    [17] 陈麒玉, 刘刚, 何珍文, 等. 面向地质大数据的结构-属性一体化三维地质建模技术现状与展望[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(4): 51-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202004007.htm

    Chen Q Y, Liu G, He Z W, et al. Current situation and prospect of structure-attribute integrated 3D geological modeling technology for geological big data[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(4): 51-58(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202004007.htm
    [18] 吴胜和, 李文克. 多点地质统计学: 理论、应用与展望[J]. 古地理学报, 2005(1): 137-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200501014.htm

    Wu S H, Li W K. Multiple-point geostatistics: Theory, application and perspective[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005(1): 137-144(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200501014.htm
    [19] 郝慧珍, 顾庆, 胡修棉. 基于机器学习的矿物智能识别方法研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(9): 3091-3106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202109005.htm

    Hao H Z, Gu Q, Hu X M. Research advances and prospective in mineral intelligent identification based on machine learning[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(9): 3091-3106(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202109005.htm
    [20] 郭艳军, 周哲, 林贺洵, 等. 基于深度学习的智能矿物识别方法研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2020, 27(5): 39-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY202005006.htm

    Guo Y J, Zhou Z, Lin H X, et al. The mineral intelligence identification method based on deep learning algorithms[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020, 27(5): 39-47(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY202005006.htm
    [21] 刘彦锋, 张文彪, 段太忠, 等. 深度学习油气藏地质建模研究进展[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(4): 235-241. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202104023.htm

    Liu Y F, Zhang W B, Duan T Z, et al. Progress of deep learning in oil and gas reservoir geological modeling[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(4): 235-241(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202104023.htm
    [22] 马瑶, 赵江南. 机器学习方法在矿产资源定量预测应用研究进展[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 132-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202101013.htm

    Ma Y, Zhao J N. Advances in the application of machine learning methods in mineral prospectivity mapping[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 132-141(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202101013.htm
    [23] 万里明, 吴均, 卢军凯, 等. 基于Adam-神经网络的致密砂岩脆性评价方法: 以南堡凹陷高北边坡为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(2): 94-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202002011.htm

    Wan L M, Wu J, Lu J K, et al. Brittleness evaluation method of tight sandstone based on Adam-neural network: A case study of a block in Gaobei slope, Nanpu Sag[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(2): 94-103(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202002011.htm
    [24] 陈仲为. 深度学习的发展以及应用[J]. 现代计算机, 2019(17): 46-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDJS201917011.htm

    Chen Z W. Development and application of deep learning[J]. Modern Computer, 2019(17): 46-50(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDJS201917011.htm
    [25] 张福临. 深度学习在岩石薄片图像生成中的研究与应用[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2021.

    Zhang F L. Research and application of depth learning in rock slice image generation[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Shiyou University, 2021(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [26] 李兴保. 基于生成对抗网络的数字岩心重构研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2020.

    Li X B. Research on digital core reconstruction based on generative countermeasure network[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2020(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [27] 张挺, 王先武, 杜奕, 等. 基于DCGANs的二维页岩图像重构方法[J]. 上海电力大学学报, 2021, 37(4): 402-406. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYXY202104016.htm

    Zhang T, Wang X W, Du Y, et al. 2D shale image reconstruction based on DCGANs[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2021, 37(4): 402-406(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYXY202104016.htm
    [28] 陈龙. 基于生成对抗网络的多孔介质重构[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2020.

    Chen L. Reconstruction of porous media based on generative countermeasure network[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2020(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [29] Diederik P. Kingma and max welling, auto-encoding variational bayes[J]. CoRR, 2013, abs/1312.6114.
    [30] Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadiej, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[C]//Anon. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, [S. l. ]: [s. n. ], 2014: 2672-2680.
    [31] Canchumuni S W A, Emerick A A, Pacheco M A C. Towards a robust parameterization for conditioning facies models using deep variational autoencoders and ensemble smoother[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2019, 128: 87-102.
    [32] Laloy E, Héraut R, Jacques D, et al. Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural network[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(1): 381-406.
    [33] Zhang T F, Peter T K, Emilien D, et al. Generating geologically realistic 3D reservoir facies models using deep learning of sedimentary architecture with generative adversarial networks[J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16: 541-549.
    [34] Bao J M, Chen D, Wen F, et al. CVAE-GAN: Fine-grained image generation through asymmetric training[C]//Anon. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. [S. l. ]: [s. n. ], 2017: 2745-2754.
    [35] Kingma D, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization[C]//Anon. Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations. [S. l. ]: [s. n. ], 2015.
  • 加载中
图(16)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  488
  • PDF下载量:  54
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-09-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回