留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

渝东南盆缘转换带五峰组-龙马溪组常压页岩气保存条件评价

刘义生 金吉能 潘仁芳 李笑天 朱正平

刘义生, 金吉能, 潘仁芳, 李笑天, 朱正平. 渝东南盆缘转换带五峰组-龙马溪组常压页岩气保存条件评价[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(1): 253-263. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210768
引用本文: 刘义生, 金吉能, 潘仁芳, 李笑天, 朱正平. 渝东南盆缘转换带五峰组-龙马溪组常压页岩气保存条件评价[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(1): 253-263. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210768
Liu Yisheng, Jin Jineng, Pan Renfang, Li Xiaotian, Zhu Zhengping. Preservation condition evaluation of normal pressure shale gas in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations of basin margin transition zone, Southeast Chongqing[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(1): 253-263. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210768
Citation: Liu Yisheng, Jin Jineng, Pan Renfang, Li Xiaotian, Zhu Zhengping. Preservation condition evaluation of normal pressure shale gas in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations of basin margin transition zone, Southeast Chongqing[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(1): 253-263. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210768

渝东南盆缘转换带五峰组-龙马溪组常压页岩气保存条件评价

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210768
基金项目: 

“十三五”国家科技重大专项 2016ZX05061-001

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目 41804120

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘义生(1992—),男,现正攻读矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,主要从事非常规油气地质研究工作。E-mail: lys06372@163.com

    通讯作者:

    金吉能(1987—),男,讲师,主要从事非常规油气地质、石油地球物理研究工作。E-mail: jjn@yangtzeu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE122

Preservation condition evaluation of normal pressure shale gas in the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations of basin margin transition zone, Southeast Chongqing

  • 摘要:

    四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组页岩广泛发育,页岩气资源丰富,盆地内五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气已获得大规模商业突破。渝东南盆缘转换带处于构造变形强烈区域,相对于盆内五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集过程,需要对保存条件的评价提出更高的要求。为此,针对渝东南盆缘转换带复杂的构造格局,通过对构造演化、抬升剥蚀、断裂发育、构造样式、顶底板条件、地层压力等多因素叠合分析,开展了保存条件的研究。结果表明,盆缘转换带抬升剥蚀严重,断裂发育,形成了一系列残留构造样式;距离剥蚀边界、大断层近的区域内,五峰组-龙马溪组均有天然气逸散的情况,地层压力系数普遍小于1.2;桑拓坪向斜、武隆向斜大断裂发育较少,五峰组-龙马溪组在远离剥蚀区具有良好的页岩气保存条件。因此后期抬升剥蚀和断裂发育是天然气散失后常压形成的主要原因;尽管由盆内向盆外地层压力系数由超压转变为常压,但构造形成了窄陡残留背斜、宽缓残留向斜和残留斜坡的页岩气保存形式。最后建立了渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气保存条件的评价标准,划分了3类有利目标区。

     

  • 图 1  渝东南构造格局及地层格架

    F1.齐岳山断裂; F2.彭水-建始断裂; F3.大千断层; F4.茶园断层; F5.胡家园断层; ①南川背斜; ②武隆向斜; ③桑拓坪向斜; ④道真向斜; ⑤白马向斜

    Figure 1.  Tectonic and stratigraphic framework in Southeast Chongqing

    图 2  渝东南超压-常压构造演化剖面

    (据文献[18]修改)

    Figure 2.  Tectonic evolution section of overpressure and normal pressure zone in Southeast Chongqing

    图 3  渝东南部分井点龙马溪组地层压力系数、产气量与主要断裂平面图

    Figure 3.  Distribution of formation pressure coefficient, gas production and main faults of Longmaxi Formation in some wells of Southeast Chongqing

    图 4  渝东南页岩气构造保存样式

    a.残留背斜:角度大,规模小,断裂发育,天然气主要从断裂逸散; b.残留向斜:角度平缓,规模大,断裂不发育,天然气主要从上部剥蚀处逸散; c.残留斜坡:角度较大,断裂不发育,天然气主要从上部断裂、剥蚀处逸散

    Figure 4.  Structural patterns of shale gas preservation in Southeast Chongqing

    图 5  彭页1井岩性剖面及地化特征

    Figure 5.  Lithologic profile and geochemical characteristics of PY1 well

    图 6  渝东南地区龙马溪组一段连井剖面

    ①~⑤为龙一段下五段1~5小层;⑥,⑦为龙一段中亚段6~7小层;⑧,⑨为龙一段上亚段8~9小层

    Figure 6.  Well-crossprofile of the First Member of Longmaxi Formation in Southeast Chongqing

    图 7  地层压力系数与产气量关系图

    Figure 7.  Relationship between formation pressure coefficient and gas production

    图 8  渝东南隆页1井埋藏史

    (据文献[18]修改)

    Figure 8.  Burial history of LY1 well in Southeast Chongqing

    图 9  四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩及周缘地层压力系数

    (据文献[26]修改)

    Figure 9.  Formation pressure coefficient of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations shale in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery

    图 10  渝东南盆缘转换带有利目标区划分

    Figure 10.  Division of favorable target areas in the basin margin transition zone of Southeast Chongqing

    表  1  五峰组-龙马溪组构造样式地震剖面

    Table  1.   Basic structural style in the seismic section of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations

    构造样式 形成时期 典型构造
    基底逆冲 早-中燕山期 青龙乡断层
    扭动构造 中燕山期第三阶段 断鼻扭褶带
    断弯褶皱 中燕山期第二阶段 龙济桥断层
    背冲构造 中燕山期第三阶段 东胜背斜南段
    对冲构造 中燕山期第三阶段 平桥背斜北段
    冲起构造 中燕山期第三阶段 袁家沟断层南段
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  渝东南代表井参数

    Table  2.   Parameters of representative wells in Southeast Chongqing

    井位 位置 构造样式 超压与否 压力系数 断层/剥蚀边界距离/km 埋深/m 产气量/(104m3·d-1)
    胜页1 东胜背斜 背斜 超压 1.36 未剥蚀 3 476 14.6
    真页1 道真向斜 斜坡 常压 1.18 剥蚀边界2.8 595
    彭页1 桑拓坪向斜 宽缓向斜 常压 0.96 剥蚀边界5.9 2 160 2.52
    彭页3 桑拓坪向斜 向斜核部 常压 1.05 剥蚀边界8.1 2 809 3.8
    隆页1 武隆向斜 宽缓向斜 常压 1.08 距大断裂2.1 2 832 6.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  常压页岩气保存条件评价指标(部分指标参考文献[34-38])

    Table  3.   Evaluation Index for the preservation condition of normal pressure shale gas

    评价参数 评价指标
    Ⅰ类 Ⅱ类 Ⅲ类
    构造样式 背斜、斜坡、宽缓向斜 较宽缓向斜 较紧闭-紧闭复杂褶皱
    距剥蚀边界距离/km >4 2~4 < 2
    断层 断裂发育程度 断裂不发育、规模小 断裂较发育、规模小 断裂发育、规模较大
    距断层/km >1.5 0.5~1.5 < 0.5
    顶底板条件 厚度/m >50 30~50 < 30
    均质性 岩性致密,均质 较致密,均质 较致密,不均质
    地层压力系数 >1.2 0.9~1.2 < 0.9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 方志雄. 中国南方常压页岩气勘探开发面临的挑战及对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(5): 1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.001

    Fang Z X. Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in southern China[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 1-13(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.001
    [2] 聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm

    Nie H K, He Z L, Liu G X, et al. Status and direction of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1): 13-35(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm
    [3] Guo T L. Evaluation of highly thermally mature shale-gas reservoirs in complex structural parts of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(6): 863-873. doi: 10.1007/s12583-013-0384-4
    [4] Hao F, Zou H, Lu Y. Mechanisms of shale gas storage: Implications for shale gas exploration in China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(8): 1325-1346. doi: 10.1306/02141312091
    [5] 谭淋耘, 徐铫, 李大华, 等. 页岩气成藏主控因素与成藏模式研究: 以渝东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(3): 126-132. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201503017.htm

    Tan L Y, Xu Y, Li D H, et al. Research on the main control factors and models for shale gas accumulation: A case study of Wufeng and Longmaxi formations in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(3): 126-132(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201503017.htm
    [6] 何顺, 秦启荣, 周吉羚, 等. 川东南DS地区龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及期次解析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2): 101-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902012.htm

    He S, Qin Q R, Zhou J L. et al. Shale fracture characteristics and its application of the Longmaxi Formation in DS area, Southeast Sichuan[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(2): 101-109(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902012.htm
    [7] 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 何贵松, 等. 渝东南南川页岩气田地质特征及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 305-316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103005.htm

    He X P, Gao Y Q, He G S, et al. Geological characteristics and key technologies for exploration and development of Nanchuan Shale Gas Field in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 305-316(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103005.htm
    [8] Sun C, Nie H, Dang W, et al. Shale gas exploration and development in China: Current status, geological challenges, and future directions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(8): 6359-6379.
    [9] 汤济广, 汪凯明, 秦德超, 等. 川东南南川地区构造变形与页岩气富集[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(5): 11-21. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0502

    Tang J G, Wang K M, Qin D C, et al. Tectonic deformation and its constraints to shale gas accumulation in Nanchuan area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(5): 11-21(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0502
    [10] Xu S, Liu R, Hao F, et al. Complex rotation of maximum horizontal stress in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale on the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin, China: Implications for predicting natural fractures[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 109: 519-529. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.06.008
    [11] Chen L, Lu Y, Li J, et al. Comparative study on the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in the Jiaoshiba shale gas field and the Pengshui area in the southeast Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Geosciences Journal, 2020, 24(1): 61-71. doi: 10.1007/s12303-019-0014-y
    [12] 庹秀松, 陈孔全, 罗顺社, 等. 四川盆地东南缘齐岳山断裂构造特征与页岩气保存条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(5): 1017-1027. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005013.htm

    Tuo X S, Chen K Q, Luo S S, et al. Structural characteristics of Qiyueshan fault and shale gas preservation at the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(5): 1017-1027(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202005013.htm
    [13] 潘仁芳, 李笑天, 金吉能, 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气储层非均质性特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(12): 26-36. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.003

    Pan R F, Li X T, Jin J N, et al. Heterogeneity characteristics and controlling factors of normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs in the basin-margin transition zone of SE Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(12): 26-36(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.003
    [14] 冉天, 谭先锋, 陈浩, 等. 渝东南地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏地质特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(5): 17-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2017.05.003

    Ran T, Tan X F, Chen H, et al. Geological characteristics of shale gas accumulation in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery, 2017, 24(5): 17-26(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2017.05.003
    [15] 袁玉松, 方志雄, 何希鹏, 等. 彭水及邻区龙马溪组页岩气常压形成机制[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 9-16, 21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001003.htm

    Yuan Y S, Fang Z X, He X P, et al. Normal pressure formation mechanism of Longmaxi shale gas in Pengshui and its adjacent areas[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 9-16, 21(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001003.htm
    [16] 聂海宽, 汪虎, 何治亮, 等. 常压页岩气形成机制、分布规律及勘探前景: 以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(2): 131-143, 164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201902001.htm

    Nie H K, Wang H, He Z L, et al. Formation mechanism, distribution and exploration prospect of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case study of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(2): 131-143, 164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201902001.htm
    [17] 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 唐显春, 等. 渝东南地区常压页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 654-664. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201704021.htm

    He X P, Gao Y Q, Tang X C, et al. Analysis of major factors controlling the accumulation in normal pressure shale gas in the Southeast of Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(4): 654-664(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201704021.htm
    [18] 方志雄, 何希鹏. 渝东南武隆向斜常压页岩气形成与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 819-827. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201606005.htm

    Fang Z X, He X P. Formation and evolution of shale gas in the Wulong slanting normal pressure in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6): 819-827(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201606005.htm
    [19] 何治亮, 聂海宽, 张钰莹. 四川盆地及其周缘奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 8-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602004.htm

    He Z L, Nie H K, Zhang Y Y. The main factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 8-17(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602004.htm
    [20] 彭勇民, 龙胜祥, 何希鹏, 等. 彭水地区常压页岩气储层特征及有利区评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(5): 12-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202005004.htm

    Peng Y M, Long S X, He X P et al. Characteristics of normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs and evaluation of its favorable areas in Pengshui[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 12-19(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202005004.htm
    [21] 郭旭升. 南方海相页岩气"二元富集"规律: 四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J]. 地质学报, 2014, 88(7): 1209-1218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201407001.htm

    Guo X S. Rules of two-factors enrichment for marine shale gas in southern China: Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding area[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(7): 1209-1218(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201407001.htm
    [22] 何治亮, 胡宗全, 聂海宽, 等. 四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集特征与"建造—改造"评价思路[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 724-733. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201705007.htm

    He Z L, Hu Z Q, Nie H K, et al. Characterization of shale gas enrichment in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in the Sichuan Basin and its evaluation of geological construction transformation evolution sequence[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(5): 724-733(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201705007.htm
    [23] 何贵松, 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带金佛斜坡常压页岩气富集模式[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(6): 50-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202006007.htm

    He G S, He X P, Gao Y Q, et al. Enrichment model of normal-pressure shale gas in the Jinfo slope of the basin-margin transition zone in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(6): 50-60(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202006007.htm
    [24] 何希鹏, 王运海, 王彦祺, 等. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气勘探实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1): 126-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001012.htm

    He X P, Wang Y H, Wang Y Q, et al. Exploration practices of normal-pressure shale gas in the marginal transition zone of the Southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1): 126-136(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202001012.htm
    [25] 聂海宽, 金之钧, 马鑫, 等. 四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组底部笔石带及沉积特征[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 160-174. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201702004.htm

    Nie H K, Jin Z J, Ma X, et al. Graptolites zone and sedimentary characteristics of upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(2): 160-174. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201702004.htm
    [26] 何希鹏, 张培先, 房大志, 等. 渝东南彭水-武隆地区常压页岩气生产特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018, 25(5): 72-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201805011.htm

    He X P, Zhang P X, Fang D Z, et al. Production characteristics of normal pressure shale gas in Pengshui-Wulong area, Southeast Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018, 25(5): 72-79(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201805011.htm
    [27] Li S, Li Y, He Z, et al. Differential deformation on two sides of Qiyueshan Fault along the eastern margin of Sichuan Basin, China, and its influence on shale gas preservation[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 121: 104602.
    [28] Tang X, Jiang Z, Song Y, et al. Advances on the mechanism of reservoir forming and gas accumulation of the Longmaxi Formation shale in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(5): 3972-3988.
    [29] 何贵松. 川南古蔺地区仁页1井五峰组-龙马溪组生物地层及成藏特征[J]. 地层学杂志, 2021, 45(2): 142-150. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ202102003.htm

    He G S. Biostratigraphy and reservoir characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations shale in Well Renye-1 of Gulin area, southern Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2021, 45(2): 142-150(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ202102003.htm
    [30] Xu H, Zhou W, Cao Q, et al. Differential fluid migration behaviour and tectonic movement in Lower Silurian and Lower Cambrian shale gas systems in China using isotope geochemistry[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 89: 47-57.
    [31] 汪生秀, 汪威, 张志平, 等. 渝东南强变形区断裂对页岩气藏保存条件的控制作用[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(6): 695-699. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202006005.htm

    Wang S X, Wang W, Zhang Z P, et al. Controlling effect of faults in strong deformation zone on shale gas reservoir preservation conditions in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2020, 27(6): 695-699(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202006005.htm
    [32] Liang C, Jiang Z X, Yang Y T, et al. Characteristics of shale lithofacies and reservoir space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6): 691-698.
    [33] 赵文韬, 荆铁亚, 吴斌, 等. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制: 以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201809011.htm

    Zhao W T, Jing T Y, Wu B, et al. Controlling mechanism of faults on the preservation conditions of shale gas: A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201809011.htm
    [34] 聂海宽, 包书景, 高波, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘下古生界页岩气保存条件研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(3): 280-294. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201203030.htm

    Nie H K, Bao S J, Gao B, et al. A study of shale gas preservation conditions for the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(3): 280-294(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201203030.htm
    [35] 马永生, 楼章华, 郭彤楼, 等. 中国南方海相地层油气保存条件综合评价技术体系探讨[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(3): 406-417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200603013.htm

    Ma Y S, Lou Z H, Guo T L, et al. An exploration on a technological system of petroleum preservation evaluation for marine strata in south China[J]. Journal of Geology, 2006, 80(3): 406-417(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200603013.htm
    [36] 王濡岳, 丁文龙, 龚大建, 等. 黔北地区海相页岩气保存条件: 以贵州岑巩区块下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 45-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201601008.htm

    Wang R Y, Ding W L, Gong D J, et al. Gas preservation conditions of marine shale in northern Guizhou area: A case study of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Cengong block, Guizhou Province[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1): 45-55(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201601008.htm
    [37] 雷子慧, 赵安坤, 余谦, 等. 贵州北部安场向斜下志留统龙马溪组页岩气保存条件[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(4): 121-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201604019.htm

    Lei Z H, Zhao A K, Yu Q, et al. Preservation of shale gas in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Anchang Syncline Unit in Northern Guizhou, South China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(4): 121-127(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201604019.htm
    [38] 楼章华, 马永生, 郭彤楼, 等. 中国南方海相地层油气保存条件评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(8): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200608002.htm

    Lou Z H, Ma Y S, Guo T L, et al. Evaluation of oil and gas preservation conditions in marine formation in South China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(8): 8-11(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200608002.htm
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  613
  • PDF下载量:  81
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-06

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回