高尚堡油田高3102断块沙三2+3亚段中低渗透储层可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素

陈儒贤; 侯加根

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220184

高尚堡油田高3102断块沙三2+3亚段中低渗透储层可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220184

陈儒贤^{a, b,},
侯加根^{a, b, ,}

a.
中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249
b.
中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249

详细信息

作者简介:
陈儒贤(1997—), 男, 助理工程师, 主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究工作。E-mail: 1605283604@qq.com

通讯作者:
侯加根(1963—), 男, 教授, 主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究工作。E-mail: jghou63@hotmail.com

中图分类号: P618.13
计量
- 文章访问数: 478
- PDF下载量: 29
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-04-29
- 录用日期: 2022-09-08
- 修回日期: 2022-09-03

Occurrence characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in the medium- and low-permeability reservoirs of the Es₃²⁺³ submember of the Gao3102 fault block in the Gaoshangpu Oilfield

Chen Ruxian^{a, b
,},
Hou Jiagen^{a, b
, ,}

a.
College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
b.
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

摘要

摘要:
为了明确中低渗透储层可动流体赋存特征, 以期更好地指导油田增储上产, 以高尚堡油田高3102断块沙三2+3亚段中低渗透砂岩储层为研究对象, 基于薄片资料、全岩衍射分析、高压压汞曲线、密闭取心核磁共振资料、扫描电镜以及油水相渗曲线, 开展了不同孔隙结构储层可动流体的赋存特征及其影响因素研究。结果表明: ①不同孔隙结构储层可动流体饱和度差异较大。Ⅰ类中孔中喉型储层核磁共振T₂谱呈左低右高双峰型, 可动流体饱和度平均61.14%;Ⅱ类中小孔细喉型储层核磁共振T₂谱呈左高右高双峰型, 可动流体饱和度平均45.24%;Ⅲ类细孔微喉型储层核磁共振T₂谱呈左高右低双峰型, 可动流体饱和度平均30.45%;Ⅳ类微孔微喉型储层核磁共振T₂谱呈左高单峰型, 可动流体饱和度平均13.86%;②储层宏观物性、微观孔隙结构、黏土矿物含量以及储层润湿性共同控制可动流体赋存特征。其中微观孔隙结构是可动流体赋存的关键因素, 孔喉半径越大, 储层渗流能力越好, 黏土矿物含量越低, 储层润湿性越弱, 可动流体饱和度越高。该研究结果对高尚堡油田沙三2+3亚段储层高效注水开发提供合理科学依据。
- 高尚堡油田 /
- 沙三2+3亚段 /
- 微观孔隙结构 /
- 可动流体
Abstract: Objective
In order to clarify the occurrence characteristics of movable fluids in medium- and low-permeability reservoirs, so as to better guide the increase in oil reserves and production in the oilfield.
Methods
This study focuses on the medium- and low-permeability sandstone reservoirs in the Es₃²⁺³ submember of the Gao3102 fault block in the Gaoshangpu Oilfield. Based on thin section data, whole-rock diffraction analysis, high-pressure mercury injection curves, closed core nuclear magnetic resonance data, scanning electron microscopy, and oil-water phase permeability curves, the occurrence characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluids in reservoirs with different pore structures were conducted.
Results
The results show that (1) the movable fluid saturation of reservoirs with different pore structures varies greatly. The T₂ spectrum of the nuclear magnetic resonance of the class Ⅰ medium porosity and medium throat reservoir is bimodal with left low and right thigh, and the average saturation of movable fluid is 61.14%. The T₂ spectrum of the nuclear magnetic resonance of the class Ⅱ medium and small pore fine throat reservoir shows a double peak type with left high and right high, and the average of movable fluid saturation is 45.24%. The T₂ spectrum of the nuclear magnetic resonance of the class Ⅲ fine porous micro throat reservoir shows a double peak type of left high and right low, and the average of movable fluid saturation is 30.45%. The T₂ spectrum of the nuclear magnetic resonance of the class Ⅳ microporous micro throat reservoir shows a left high single peak, and the average saturation of movable fluid is 13.86%. (2) The macroscopic physical properties, microscopic pore structure, clay mineral content and reservoir wettability of the reservoir jointly control the occurrence characteristics of the movable fluid. Among them, the microscopic pore structure is a key factor in the occurrence of movable fluid. The larger the pore throat radius is, the better the reservoir seepage capacity, the lower the clay mineral content is, the weaker the reservoir wettability is, and the higher the movable fluid saturation is.
Conclusion
The results of this research can provide a reasonable scientific basis for high-efficiency water injection development of the Es₃²⁺³ reservoir in the Gaoshangpu Oilfield.
- Gaoshangpu Oilfield /
- Es₃²⁺³ submember /
- microscopic pore structure /
- movable fluid
注释:

(所有作者声明不存在利益冲突)

HTML全文

图 1 高3102断块构造位置图及地层综合柱状图^[25]

a.渤海湾盆地构造格局；b.高尚堡深层Es₃²⁺³亚段油藏构造图；c.高3102断块Es₃²⁺³亚段Ⅲ油组顶面构造图; d.地层划分柱状图

Figure 1. Structural location map and comprehensive histogram of the Gao 3102 fault block in the study area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段岩石学特征

Figure 2. Petrological characteristics of the Es₃²⁺³ submember in the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层物性特征

Figure 3. Reservoir physical properties of the Es₃²⁺³ submember in the Gao 3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 高尚堡油田高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层微观孔隙特征相片

a.长石岩屑砂岩，发育粒间孔，粒间溶孔，GJ3102-8井，蓝色铸体薄片(单偏光)，3 499.04 m；b.长石岩屑砂岩，残余粒间孔为主，GJ3102-8井，蓝色铸体薄片(单偏光)，3 519.12 m；c.岩屑砂岩，发育粒内溶孔，GJ3102-8井，蓝色铸体薄片(单偏光)，3 490.76 m；d.长石砂岩，铸模孔，颗粒溶孔，GJ3102-8井，蓝色铸体薄片(单偏光)，3 513.96 m；e.绿泥石晶间微孔，GJ3102-8井，扫描电镜, 3 490.76 m；f.微裂缝，GJ3102-8井，铸体薄片(单偏)，3 429.46 m

Figure 4. Microscopic pore characteristic photos of the Es₃²⁺³ submember in the Gao3102 fault block of the Gaoshangpu Oilfield

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 高尚堡油田高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层空间类型特征

Figure 5. Reservoir space type characteristics of the Es₃²⁺³ submember in the Gao3102 fault block of the Gaoshangpu Oilfield

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段不同孔隙结构高压压汞曲线和孔喉半径分布

S_max为最大压汞饱和度; P_d为排驱压力

Figure 6. High pressure mercury injection curves of different pore structures in the Es₃²⁺³ submember of the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 核磁共振T₂截止值的确定

Figure 7. Determination of the cut-off value of NMR T₂

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段不同孔隙结构储层核磁共振T₂谱图

Figure 8. NMR T₂ spectra of reservoirs with different pore structures in the Es₃²⁺³ submember of the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段不同孔隙结构储层油水相对渗透率

K_ro.油相相对渗透率；K_rw.水相相对渗透率

Figure 9. Relative permeability of oil and water in reservoirs with different pore structures in the Es₃²⁺³ sub member of the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段可动流体饱和度与储层物性相关性分析

Figure 10. Relationship between reservoir physical properties and movable fluid saturation of the Es₃²⁺³ sub member in the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段孔可动流体饱和度与储层孔喉结构参数相关性分析

Figure 11. Relationship between pore throat structure parameters and movable fluid saturation of the Es₃²⁺³ sub member in the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段可动流体饱和度与储层黏土矿物成分的相关性分析

Figure 12. Caly minerals and movable fluid saturation of the Es₃²⁺³ sub member in the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层典型微观扫描电镜相片

a.绿泥石，微晶石英填充，GJ-314号样品; b.绿泥石，微晶石英填充，GJ-204号样品; c.方解石发橙色光，GJ-206号样品; d.伊利石及微孔，GJ-197号样品

Figure 13. Typical microscopic scanning electron microscope photos of the Es₃²⁺³ sub member reservoir in the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段可动流体饱和度与储层润湿指数的相关性分析

Figure 14. Wettability index and movable fluid saturation of the reservoir of the Es₃²⁺³ submember reservoir in the Gao3102 fault block

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层不同孔隙结构特征参数

Table 1. Characteristic parameters table of different pore structures in the Es₃²⁺³ submember of the Gao3102 fault block

代表样品编号	孔隙结构分类	排驱压力/MPa	平均孔喉半径/μm	最大孔喉半径/μm	均质系数	分选系数	退汞效率/%	最大进汞饱和度/%	孔隙度/%	渗透率/10^-3 μm²
GJ-45	Ⅰ类	0.010	8.446	73.640	0.115	9.155	51.57	90.79	18.30	116.00
GJ-38	Ⅰ类	0.032	6.780	65.230	0.320	5.320	39.62	80.05	16.60	101.60
GJ-393	Ⅱ类	0.049	6.640	16.840	0.480	4.849	35.12	82.91	13.90	66.30
GJ-409	Ⅱ类	0.073	3.490	10.010	0.370	3.250	41.87	74.20	16.40	35.70
GJ-314	Ⅲ类	0.301	1.540	3.389	0.236	0.588	31.50	63.34	13.68	7.59
GJ-197	Ⅲ类	0.308	0.550	2.390	0.230	1.220	33.55	52.33	14.60	2.86
GJ-204	Ⅳ类	0.550	0.246	1.442	0.180	0.321	80.20	27.03	7.50	0.85
GJ-206	Ⅳ类	2.068	0.069	0.356	0.187	0.063	21.10	20.26	7.20	2.06

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层核磁共振T₂谱及渗流参数

Table 2. NMR T₂ spectrum and seepage parameters of the reservoir in the Es₃²⁺³ submember of the Gao3102 fault block

代表样品编号	样品深度/m	岩性	孔隙结构类型	T₂谱类型	可动流体饱和度/%	T₂截止值/ms	S_wx/%	K_rwm/%	W_i
GJ-45	3 431.24	粗粒岩屑长石砂岩	Ⅰ类	左低右高双峰	61.14	12.30	47.20	55.3	20.31
GJ-38	3 430.36	巨-粗粒长石岩屑砂岩	Ⅰ类	左低右高双峰	63.66	11.20	51.00	42.0	29.50
GJ-393	3 511.48	中粒岩屑长石砂岩	Ⅱ类	左高右高双峰	45.24	6.57	53.50	20.2	87.60
GJ-409	3 513.78	粗粒长石岩屑砂岩	Ⅱ类	左高右高双峰	40.04	8.10	51.70	13.1	116.92
GJ-314	3 499.04	不等粒岩屑长石砂岩	Ⅲ类	左高右低双峰	30.45	3.66	50.50	13.6	119.93
GJ-197	3 483.12	细粒岩屑长石砂岩	Ⅲ类	左高右低双峰	22.11	3.22	51.70	10.0	181.50
GJ-204	3 483.84	巨粒长石岩屑砂岩	Ⅳ类	左高单峰型	13.86	3.20	65.30	5.0	601.00
GJ-206	3 484.18	含碳酸盐砂质砾岩	Ⅳ类	左高单峰型	14.87	2.13	64.65	6.1	449.20
注：S_wx为油水相渗交点处含水饱和度；K_rwn为最大含水饱和度下水相相对渗透率；W_i为润湿指数

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 高3102断块沙三2+3亚段储层典型岩心样品的黏土矿物X射线分析结果

Table 3. X-ray analysis results of clay minerals of typical core samples from the in Es₃²⁺³ sub member reservoir in the Gao3102 fault block

样品编号	孔隙结构类型	黏土矿物相对质量分数/%				伊/蒙混层比/%	黏土矿物绝对质量分数/%
样品编号	孔隙结构类型	绿泥石	伊蒙混层	高岭石	伊利石	伊/蒙混层比/%	黏土矿物绝对质量分数/%
GJ-45	Ⅰ类	53.8	13.4	28.0	4.8	54	3.8
GJ-38	Ⅰ类	42.1	21.3	27.7	8.9	55	4.4
GJ-393	Ⅱ类	51.7	21.3	20.5	6.5	51	4.9
GJ-409	Ⅱ类	65.5	12.9	18.7	2.9	50	4.0
GJ-314	Ⅲ类	66.9	14.3	16.5	2.3	68	4.8
GJ-197	Ⅲ类	56.7	16.5	20.8	6.0	55	5.8
GJ-204	Ⅳ类	43.2	27.8	23.4	5.6	54	4.7
GJ-206	Ⅳ类	22.3	53.6	15.2	8.9	78	7.5

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(40)

[1]	邹才能, 陶士华, 侯连华. 非常规油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011: 103-117. Zou C N, Tao S H, Hou L H. Unconventional oil and gas geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011: 103-117(in Chinese).
[2]	Xiao Z K, Ding W L, Hao S Y, et al. Quantitative analysis of tight sandstone reservoir heterogeneity based on rescaled range analysis and empirical mode decomposition: A case study of the Chang 7 reservoir in the Dingbian Oilfield[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 182: 106326. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106326
[3]	刘凯, 石万忠, 王任, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区盒1段致密砂岩孔隙结构分形特征及其与储层物性的关系[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 57-68. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0102 Liu K, Shi W Z, Wang R, et al. Pore structure fractal characteristics and its relationship with reservoir properties the First Member of Lower Shihezi Formation tight sandstone in Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 57-68(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0102
[4]	何娟, 孙立春, 倪军娥, 等. 伊拉克M油田Asmari组B段混积岩储层特征及储层非均质性对开发的影响[J]. 中国海上油气, 2018, 30(4): 127-134. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201804015.htm He J, Sun L C, Ni J E, et al. Characteristics and heterogeneity of the diamictite reservoir in B Member of Asmari Formation in M oilfield, Iraq and their impacts on development[J]. China offshore oil and gas, 2018, 30(4): 127-134(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201804015.htm
[5]	李玉喜, 何建华, 尹帅, 等. 页岩油气储层纵向多重非均质性及其对开发的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 118-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602014.htm Li Y X, He J H, Yin S, et al. The multi-anisotropy of shale oil and gas reservoirs in vertical and its influence on oil-gas development[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 118-125(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602014.htm
[6]	马淼, 孙卫, 刘登科, 等. 低渗透砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及影响因素研究: 以姬塬油田长6储层为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2016, 30(6): 64-68, 72, 129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201606015.htm Ma M, Sun W, Liu D K, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in low permeability sandstone reservoir: By taking Chang 6 reservoir in Jiyuan Oilfield of Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2016, 30(6): 64-68, 72, 129(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201606015.htm
[7]	张世铭, 王建功, 张小军, 等. 酒西盆地间泉子段储层流体赋存及渗流特[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1111-1119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201808006.htm Zhang S M, Wang J G, Zhang X J, et al. Studies on the reservoir characteristics and the fluid flow in Jianquanzi Member of the Jiuxi Basin, Northwest China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(8): 1111-1119(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201808006.htm
[8]	卜淘, 曹廷宽. ZJ气田沙溪庙组储层微观孔隙结构及渗流特征研究[J]. 矿物岩石, 2018, 38(3): 104-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201803013.htm Pu T, Cao Y K. Study of pore structure and seepage characteristics of Shaximiao Formation reservoir in ZJ Gasfield[J]. Mineral rock, 2018, 38(3): 104-112(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201803013.htm
[9]	卢振东, 刘成林, 臧起彪, 等. 高压压汞与核磁共振技术在致密储层孔隙结构分析中的应用: 以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(3): 300-310. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0256 Lu Z D, Liu C L, Zang Q B, et al. Application of high pressure mercury injection and nuclear magnetic resonance in analysis of the pore structure of dense sandstone: A case study of the Heshui area, Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(3): 300-310(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0256
[10]	韩进, 孙卫, 白云云, 等. 基于真实砂岩微观水驱油实验的低渗透储层流体渗流特征及驱油效率影响因素研究: 以姬塬油田王盘山长6储层为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(6): 89-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201806011.htm Han J, Sun W, Bai Y Y, et al. Fluid seepage characteristics of low permeability reservoir based on the real sandstone microscopic water flooding experiment: Taking the Chang 6 reservoir in Wangpanshan as an example[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(6): 89-95(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201806011.htm
[11]	Qu Y Q, Sun W, Wu H N, et al. Impacts of pore-throat spaces on movable fluid: Implications for understanding the tight oil exploitation process[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 137: 105509. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105509
[12]	Li P, Jia C Z, Jin Z J, et al. The characteristics of movable fluid in the Triassic lacustrine tight oil reservoir: A case study of the Chang 7 Member of Xin'anbian Block, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 102: 126-137. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.11.019
[13]	Hui W, Wang Y S, Ren D Z, et al. Effects of pore structures on the movable fluid saturation in tight sandstones: A He8 formation example in Sulige Gasfield, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 192: 107295. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107295
[14]	王剑超, 余瑜, 林良彪, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组四段致密砂岩储层可动流体饱和度影响因素[J]. 矿物岩石, 2023, 43(2): 95-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS202302010.htm Wang J C, Yu Y, Lin L B, et al. Influencing factors of mobile fluid saturation in the tight sandstone reservoir in the 4^th Member of Xujiahe Formation(T₃x⁴), western Sichuan Basin[J]. Mineral Rock, 2023, 43(2): 95-107(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS202302010.htm
[15]	Horkowitz J P, Hartman D E, Clerke E A, et al. Residual oil saturation measurements in carbonates with pulsed NMR logs[J]. Log Analyst, 1997, 38(2): 73-83.
[16]	Gao H, Li H Z. Determination of movable fluid percentage and movable fluid porosity in ultra-low permeability sandstone using nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) technique[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 133: 258-367. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.06.017
[17]	Wang W R, Yue D L, Eriksson K A, et al. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of multiple factors that influence movable fluid saturation in lacustrine deep-water gravity-flow tight sandstones from the Yanchang Formation, southern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 121: 104625.
[18]	Zang Q B, Liu C L, Awan R S, et al. Occurrence characteristics of the movable fluid in heterogeneous sandstone reservoir based on fractal analysis of NMR data: A case study of the Chang 7 Member of Ansai Block, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 214: 110499.
[19]	Li P, Sun W, Wu B L, et al. Occurrence characteristics and influential factors of movable fluids in pores with different structures of Chang 6(3) reservoir, Huaqing Oilfield, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 97: 480-492.
[20]	李海波, 郭和坤, 王学武, 等. 岩心润湿性对核磁共振可动流体T₂截止值的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 30(5): 43-47, 8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201505007.htm Li H B, Guo H K, Wang X W, et al. Influence of core wettability on NMR T₂ cutoff value of movable fluid[J]. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum University: Natural Science Edition, 2015, 30(5): 43-47, 8(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201505007.htm
[21]	郝国丽, 柳广弟, 谢增业, 等. 广安气田上三叠统须家河组致密砂岩储层气水分布特征[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 34(3): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201003003.htm Hao G L, Liu G D, Xie Z Y, et al. Gas water distribution characteristics of tight sandstone reservoir of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Guang'an Gasfield[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum: Natural Science Edition, 2010, 34(3): 1-7(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201003003.htm
[22]	李冰, 周妍, 许万坤, 等. 渤海东部疏松砂岩油藏水驱渗流特征及控制因素分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2020, 13(2): 47-50, 55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ202002012.htm Li B, Zhou Y, Xu W K, et al. Analysis on water drive seepage characteristics and control factors of unconsolidated sandstone reservoir in eastern Bohai Sea[J]. Complex reservoir, 2020, 13(2): 47-50, 55(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ202002012.htm
[23]	游秀玲, 金彦君, 常学军. 高尚堡油田沙三段二、三亚段沉积体系与沉积相[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(1): 17-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT701.002.htm You X L, Jin Y J, Chang X J. Sedimentary system and facies of Es₃²⁺³ submembers in Gaoshangbao Oilfield[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 1997, 18(1): 17-22(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT701.002.htm
[24]	徐珂, 戴俊生, 商琳, 等. 高尚堡油田深层油藏南区现今地应力场预测及应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 42(6): 19-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201806003.htm Xu K, Dai J S, Shang L, et al. Prediction of current in-situ stress filed and its application of southern area of deep reservoir in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum: Edition of Natural Science, 2018, 42(6): 19-29(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201806003.htm
[25]	冉启佑, 常学军, 刘翠荣. 高尚堡油田沙三段扇三角洲储层沉积学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(1): 23-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT701.003.htm Ran Q Y, Chang X J, Liu C R. Sedimentological characteristics of fan-delta reservoir in Es₃²⁺³ submembers, Gaoshangbao Oilfield[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 1997, 18(1): 23-29(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT701.003.htm
[26]	宋来明, 杨永强, 彭仕宓, 等. 冀东高尚堡油田Es₃²⁺³层序地层学研究[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2005, 35(4): 462-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200504009.htm Song L M, Yang Y Q, Peng S M, et al. Study on sequence stratigraphy of Es₃²⁺³ formation in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J], Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2005, 35(4): 462-468(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200504009.htm
[27]	张珂, 姜素华, 岳家彤, 等. 高尚堡油田沙三段二、三亚段微相特征研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 48(5): 86-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QDHY201805011.htm Zhang K, Jiang S H, Yue J T, et al. Sedimentary micro-facies of fan delta in Es₃²⁺³ sub member, Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China: Natural Science Edition, 2018, 48(5): 86-94(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QDHY201805011.htm
[28]	李海燕, 吴胜和, 岳大力. 高尚堡油田深层沙三2亚段沉积微相及成岩储集相特征[J]. 科技导报, 2012, 30(9): 53-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJDB201209023.htm Li H Y, Wu S H, Yue D L. Characteristics of sedimentary microfacies and diagenetic reservoir facies of deep Es₃² sub member in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Science and Technology Guide, 2012, 30(9): 53-61(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJDB201209023.htm
[29]	李业会, 齐立新, 夏秋君, 等. 高尚堡油田沙三³亚段储层发育特征[J]. 中国矿业, 2014, 23(9): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201409021.htm Li Y H, Qi L X, Xia Q J, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Es₃³ in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2014, 23(9): 83-88(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201409021.htm
[30]	周亮, 谢俊, 姜新雨, 等. 高尚堡油田沙三段二、三亚段成岩作用与岩相划分[J]. 中国科技论文, 2018, 13(21): 2475-2481. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKZX201821013.htm Zhou L, Xie J, Jiang X Y, et al. Study on the diagenetic facies classification of Es₃²⁺³ sub members in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Chinese Science Paper, 2018, 13(21): 2475-2481(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKZX201821013.htm
[31]	崔树清, 刘雪军. 高尚堡油田沙河街组三段Es₃²⁺³亚段储层非均质性研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 20(2): 22-24, 45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200502005.htm Cui S Q, Liu X J. Study on the heterogeneity of the second and the third sub members of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 20(2): 22-24, 45(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200502005.htm
[32]	张娜, 张紫筠, 王帅栋. 低渗透油藏可动流体饱和度计算及影响因素研究综述[J]. 水利水电技术, 2021, 52(9): 143-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJWJ202109015.htm Zhang N, Zhang Z Y, Wang S D. A review on calculation of movable fluid saturation of low permeability oil reservoir and its influencing factors[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2021, 52(9): 143-155(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJWJ202109015.htm
[33]	Lyu C H, Ning Z F, Cole D R, et al. Experimental investigation on T₂ cutoffs of tight sandstones: Comparisons between outcrop and reservoir cores[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2020, 191: 107184
[34]	师调调, 孙卫, 何生平. 低渗透储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体饱和度关系研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2012, 31(4): 81-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201204015.htm Shi T T, Sun W, He S P. Relationship between micro-pore structure and movable fluid saturation in low permeability reservoir[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2012, 31(4): 81-85(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201204015.htm
[35]	黄杰, 杜玉洪, 王红梅, 等. 特低渗储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体赋存特征: 以二连盆地阿尔凹陷腾一下段储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 93-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202005010.htm Huang J, Du Y H, Wang H M, et al. Characteristics of micro pore structure and movable fluid of extra-low permeability reservoir: A case study of lower Et₁ reservoir in A'er Sag, Erlian Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2020, 32(5): 93-101(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202005010.htm
[36]	黄兴, 李天太, 王香增, 等. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素: 以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 557-567. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201905005.htm Huang X, Li T T, Wang X Z, et al. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoir: A case study from Chang-8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum, 2019, 40(5): 557-567(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201905005.htm
[37]	白云云, 孙卫, 任大忠. 马岭油田致密砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及控制因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4): 455-458. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804010.htm Bai Y Y, Sun W, Ren D Z. Characteristics and controlling factors of movable fluid in low-permeability and tight sandstone reservoirs in Maling Oilfield[J]. Fault Block Oil and Gas Field, 2018, 25(4): 455-458(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804010.htm
[38]	杨胜来, 魏俊之. 油层物理学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004. Yang S L, Wei J Z. Reservoir physics[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004(in Chinese).
[39]	刘登科, 孙卫, 任大忠, 等. 致密砂岩气藏孔喉结构与可动流体赋存规律: 以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西区盒8段、山1段储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2136-2146. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201612005.htm Liu D K, Sun W, Ren D Z, et al. Features of pore-throat structures and movable fluid in tight gas reservoir: A case from the 8^th Member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation and the 1^st Member of Permian Shanxi Formation in the western area of Sulige Gasfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(12): 2136-2146(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201612005.htm
[40]	刘向君, 熊健, 梁利喜, 等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩润湿性分析及影响讨论[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(10): 1644-1652. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201410021.htm Liu X J, Xiong J, Liang L X, et al. Analysis of the wettability of Longmaxi Formation shale in the South region of Sichuan Basin and its influence[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(10): 1644-1652(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201410021.htm