Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in Fuxing area, Sichuan Basin
-
摘要:
四川盆地复兴地区侏罗系凉高山组致密砂岩储层近期表现出良好的勘探潜力，以X井和Z井为代表，均获得测试工业油气流。为了进一步明确复兴地区侏罗系凉高山组致密砂岩储层发育特征及控制因素，以该套砂岩为研究对象，通过岩心观察、普通薄片鉴定、扫描电镜观察及综合多种分析测试结果，从岩石学特征、沉积相、物性特征和成岩作用类型等多个方面对研究区目的层进行了精细刻画。研究结果表明，凉高山组致密砂岩储层总体表现为低孔低渗储层，储集空间以原生残余粒间孔发育为主，孔隙半径为10~50
μ m，喉道宽度为2~10μ m。根据成岩作用对储层物性的影响，将压实作用、部分胶结作用归为破坏性成岩作用，溶蚀作用、构造作用和绿泥石的膜状胶结作用归为建设性成岩作用。本次研究明确了三角洲前缘水下分流河道微相最利于凉高山组砂岩储层的发育，而长石的溶蚀作用、构造成因的微裂缝和以绿泥石为胶结物的胶结作用对凉高山组致密砂岩储层的物性具有改善作用，沉积-成岩综合作用是四川盆地复兴地区凉高山组致密砂岩优质储层发育的重要条件。Abstract:The tight sandstone reservoir of Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in Fuxing area, Sichuan Basin has shown good exploration potential recently. Represented by wells X and Z, the tested industrial oil and gas flows have been obtained. In order to further understand the development characteristics and control factors of tight sandstone reservoirs of Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in the Fuxing area, through core observation, ordinary thin section identification, scanning electron microscope observation and multiple test results, the target layer in the study area is analyzed in detail. The results reveal that the tight sandstone reservoir of Lianggaoshan Formation is generally characterized by low porosity and low permeability, and the reservoir space is dominated by inorganic pores with a pore radius of 10-50
μ m. Throat width is 2-10μ m。According to the influence of different diagenesis on reservoir physical properties, compaction and partial cementation are classified as destructive diagenesis, while dissolution, tectonism and cementation with chlorite cementation are divided into constructive diagenesis. This study makes clear that the subaqueous distributary channels of the delta front is the most favorable to the development of Lianggaoshan Formation sandstone reservoir. The cementation with dissolution, tectonism and chlorite cementation can improve the physical properties of Lianggaoshan Formation tight sandstone reservoir.-
Key words:
- Lianggaoshan Formation /
- tight sandstone /
- sedimentation /
- diagenesis /
- high-quality reservoir /
- Sichuan Basin
-
图 1 四川盆地复兴地区构造单元划分图(A)和凉高山组地层划分综合柱状图(B)
Figure 1. Structural unit division map of Fuxing area, Sichuan Basin (A) and comprehensive histogram of Lianggaoshan Formation stratigraphic division (B)
图 2 X井侏罗系致密砂岩岩石类型三角图
1. 石英砂岩; 2. 长石质石英砂岩; 3. 岩屑质石英砂岩; 4. 长石岩屑质石英砂岩; 5. 长石砂岩; 6. 岩屑质长石砂岩; 7. 长石质岩屑砂岩; 8. 岩屑砂岩
Figure 2. Triangle diagram of Jurassic tight sandstone rock types in Well X
图 3 X井凉三段井壁取心砂岩储层黏土矿物质量分数分布直方图
Figure 3. Distribution histogram of absolute content of clay minerals in sandstone reservoir with sidewall coring in Member 3 of Lianggaoshan Formation of Well X
图 4 X井凉高山组砂岩岩心实测孔隙度、渗透率交会图
Figure 4. Crossplot of measured porosity and permeability of sandstone core in Lianggaoshan Formation of Well X
图 5 凉高山组致密砂岩储集空间类型
A.Z井, 2 685.51 m，凉二段，原生粒间孔、粒内孔(普通薄片)；B.Z井，2 491.22 m，凉三段，原生粒间孔(扫描电镜)；C.X井，2 454.3 m，凉三段，微裂缝(普通薄片)；D.Z井，2 491.22 m，凉三段，长石粒内溶孔(扫描电镜)
Figure 5. Type of tight sandstone reservoir space in Lianggaoshan Formation
图 6 凉高山组凉二段(A)和凉三段(B)致密砂岩高压压汞测试曲线
Figure 6. High pressure mercury injection test curves of the tight sandstone in the second (A) and third (B) Members of Lianggaoshan Formation
图 7 凉高山组致密砂岩储层不同成岩作用类型镜下观察
A.Z井，2 511.02 m，凉二段，片状云母被压实作用压弯(扫描电镜)；B.Z井，2 510.1 m，凉二段，矿物呈线接触和凹凸接触(普通薄片)；C.X井，2 456.6 m，凉三段，长石粒内溶孔(扫描电镜)；D.Z井，2 491.22 m，凉三段，长石粒内溶孔(扫描电镜)；E.Z井，2 485.22 m，凉三段，微裂缝(扫描电镜)；F.X井，2 452.2 m，凉三段，石英加大边(扫描电镜)；G.X井，2 473.27 m，凉二段，方解石胶结(普通薄片)；H.X井，2 447.3 m，凉三段，绿泥石薄膜(扫描电镜)；I.X井，2 449.1 m，凉三段，绿泥石薄膜(扫描电镜)
Figure 7. Microscopic observation of different types of diagenesis in tight sandstone reservoirs of Lianggaoshan Formation
图 8 X井凉高山组沉积相柱状图
Figure 8. Lianggaoshan Formation sedimentary facies histogram of Well X
图 9 复兴地区凉高山组沉积微相识别标志
Figure 9. Identification mark for sedimentary microfacies of the Lianggaoshan Formation in Fuxing area
图 10 凉高山组砂岩薄片照片及扫描电镜照片
A.X井，2 485.1 m，凉三段，矿物的线接触、凹凸接触和点接触；B.X井，2 489.18 m，凉三段，刚性颗粒破裂(普通薄片)；C.X井，2 477.03 m，凉三段，云母颗粒被挤压变形(扫描电镜)
Figure 10. Thin section and scanning electron microscope photos of sandstone in Lianggaoshan Formation
图 11 凉高山组砂岩原始孔隙被方解石充填薄片照片和扫描电镜照片
A.X井，2 487.54 m，凉三段，方解石充填(普通薄片)；B.X井，2 577.15 m，凉二段，方解石晶粒分布于黏土质间(扫描电镜)；C.X井，2 563 m，凉二段，方解石充填(扫描电镜)
Figure 11. Thin section photos and scanning electron microscope photos of original pores of sandstone in Lianggaoshan Formation filled with calcite
图 12 X井凉高山组砂岩岩心实测孔隙度和方解石体积分数相关性分析图
Figure 12. Correlation analysis diagram of measured porosity and calcite content in core of Lianggaoshan Formation sandstone of Well X
图 13 凉高山组砂岩扫描电镜照片(溶蚀作用形成的次生孔隙)
A.Z井，2 491.22 m，凉三段，原生粒间孔(扫描电镜)；B.X井，2 456.6 m，凉三段，长石粒内溶孔(扫描电镜)；C.Z井，2 491.22 m，凉三段，长石粒内溶孔(扫描电镜)
Figure 13. Scanning electron microscopy photos of sandstone in Lianggaoshan Formation (secondary pores formed by dissolution)
图 14 凉高山组砂岩微裂缝扫描电镜照片
A.X井，2 587.75 m，凉二段，微裂缝发育(扫描电镜)；B.Z井，2 485.22 m，凉三段，微裂缝(扫描电镜)；C.X井，2 589.93 m，凉二段，被炭质充填的微裂缝(扫描电镜)
Figure 14. Scanning electron microscopy photos of micro fractures in sandstone of Lianggaoshan Formation
图 15 Z井凉高山组致密砂岩不同黏土矿物成分与物性相关性分析
a, b. 绿泥石质量分数与砂岩物性呈明显正相关性；c, d. 高岭石质量分数与砂岩物性呈弱相关性；e, f. 伊利石质量分数与砂岩物性无明显相关性
Figure 15. Correlation analysis of different clay minerals compositions and physical properties of tight sandstone in Lianggaoshan Formation of Well Z
表 1 X井凉三段砂岩压汞测试数据统计
Table 1. Statistics of mercury injection test data for sandstone in the third Member of Lianggaoshan Formation in Well X
深度/m 排驱压力/MPa 最大孔喉半径/μm 平均孔喉半径/μm 分选系数 最大汞饱和度/% 退汞效率/% 2 448.0 0.484 1.548 0.075 0.080 0 19.650 71.610 2 450.5 49.987 0.015 0.005 0.002 0 17.650 69.690 2 452.4 3.331 0.225 0.032 0.028 8 60.350 35.120 2 453.8 2.228 0.337 0.052 0.045 4 70.350 40.590 2 455.2 1.885 0.398 0.072 0.060 3 87.410 37.820 2 456.6 1.644 0.456 0.083 0.065 7 82.000 35.490 2 458.0 2.461 0.305 0.046 0.040 7 57.880 31.500 2 459.4 2.009 0.373 0.066 0.055 1 76.120 35.310 2 460.8 1.738 0.432 0.075 0.060 5 69.060 36.860 平均值 7.307 0.454 0.056 0.049 0 60.052 43.777 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 X井凉二段砂岩压汞测试数据统计
Table 2. Statistics of mercury injection test data for sandstone in the second Member of Lianggaoshan Formation in Well X
深度/m 排驱压力/MPa 最大孔喉半径/μm 平均孔喉半径/μm 分选系数 最大汞饱和度/% 退汞效率/% 2 508.9 3.429 0.219 0.049 0.031 46.706 38.88 2 509.4 32.567 0.023 0.007 0.002 11.412 40.38 2 514.4 1.103 0.680 0.043 0.034 19.288 60.51 2 517.3 12.715 0.059 0.015 0.006 16.824 34.15 2 521.2 0.272 2.759 0.161 0.243 37.790 61.59 2 526.7 2.426 0.309 0.073 0.045 41.294 45.88 2 528.7 37.274 0.020 0.006 0.002 29.647 63.64 2 537.1 0.429 1.748 0.082 0.098 27.167 61.44 2 540.1 34.418 0.022 0.006 0.002 28.471 63.86 平均值 13.848 0.649 0.049 0.051 28.733 52.26
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 邹才能, 张光亚, 陶士振, 等. 全球油气勘探领域地质特征、重大发现及非常规石油地质[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(2): 129-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201002002.htmZou C N, Zhang G Y, Tao S Z, et al. Geological characteristics, major discoveries, and unconventional petroleum geology in the global oil and gas exploration field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(2): 129-145(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201002002.htm [2] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望: 以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htmZou C N, Zhu R K, Wu S T, et al. Types, characteristics, mechanisms, and prospects of conventional and unconventional oil and gas accumulation: A case study of tight oil and gas in China[J]. Journal of Petroleum, 2012, 33(2): 173-187(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htm [3] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇, 等. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 257-264. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203002.htmDai J X, Ni Y Y, Wu X Q, et al. China's tight sandstone gas and its important significance in exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203002.htm [4] Nelson P H. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sand stones, and shales[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(3): 329-340. doi: 10.1306/10240808059 [5] Jiang Z X, Li Z, Li F, et al. Tight sandstone gas accumulation mechanism and development models[J]. Petroleum Science, 2015, 12: 587-605. doi: 10.1007/s12182-015-0061-6 [6] Zhu S F, Zhu X M, Jia Y, et al. Diagenetic alteration, pore-throat network, and reservoir quality of tight gas sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Upper Paleozoic sequence in the northern Tianhuan Depression in the Ordos Basin, China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2020, 104(11): 2297-2324. doi: 10.1306/08151919058 [7] Spencer C W. Geologic aspects of tight gas reservoirs in the Rocky Mountain region[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1985, 37(7): 1308-1314. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000035258951710_6386.html [8] Surdam R C. A new paradigm for gas exploration in anomalously pressured "tight-gas sands" in the Rocky Mountain Laramide Basins[C]//Surdam R C. Seals, traps, and the petroleum system: AAPG Memoir 67. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1997: 283-298. [9] 常宇, 刘明洁, 张庄, 等. 四川盆地川西坳陷须三段砂岩储层致密化过程定量模拟[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(1): 311-323. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0177Chang Y, Liu M J, Zhang Z, et al. Quantitativess imulation of the densification process of sand stone reservoir in the Xu 3 Member of Xujiahe Formation in Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(1): 311-323(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0177 [10] 黄彦庆, 肖开华, 金武军, 等. 川东北元坝西部须家河组致密砂岩裂缝发育特征及控制因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2): 105-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202302010.htmHuang Y Q, Xiao K H, Jin W J, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sand stone reservoir fractures in the Xujiahe Formation of the western Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2): 105-114(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202302010.htm [11] Zou C N, Zhu R K, Liu K Y, et al. Tight gas sand stone reservoirs in China: Characteristics and recognition criteria[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 88/89: 82-91. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410512000435 [12] 朱如凯, 赵霞, 刘柳红, 等. 四川盆地须家河组沉积体系与有利储集层分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1): 46-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200901007.htmZhu R K, Zhao X, Liu L H, et al. Sedimentary systems and favorable reservoir distribution of the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(1): 46-55(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200901007.htm [13] 于兴河, 李顺利, 杨志浩. 致密砂岩气储层的沉积-成岩成因机理探讨与热点问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1): 1-13, 131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201501002.htmYu X H, Li S L, Yang Z H. Discussion on the sedimentary diagenetic mechanism of tight sandstone gas reservoirs and hot topics[J]. Lithological Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1): 1-13, 131(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201501002.htm [14] 吕正祥, 刘四兵. 川西须家河组超致密砂岩成岩作用与相对优质储层形成机制[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(10): 2373-2383. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200910007.htmLü Z X, Liu S B. Diagenesis of ultra tight sandstone of Xujiahe Formation in western Sichuan and formation mechanism of relatively high-quality reservoir[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(10): 2373-2383(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200910007.htm [15] 马义权, 陆永潮, 刘树平, 等. 鄂南延长组长3段致密储层特征及相对优质储层形成机理[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 46(8): 3013-3024. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201508034.htmMa Y Q, Lu Y C, Liu S P, et al. The characteristics of tight reservoirs and the formation mechanism of relatively high-quality reservoirs in the Third Member of Yanchang Formation in southern Hubei[J]. Journal of Central South University: Natural Science Edition, 2015, 46(8): 3013-3024(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201508034.htm [16] 罗龙, 高先志, 孟万斌, 等. 深埋藏致密砂岩中相对优质储层形成机理: 以川西坳陷新场构造带须家河组为例[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(6): 930-944. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201706010.htmLuo L, Gao X Z, Meng W B, et al. The formation mechanism of relatively high quality reservoirs in deeply buried dense sandstones: Taking the Xujiahe Formation in the Xinchang structural belt of the Western Sichuan Depression as an example[J]. Journal of Earth, 2017, 38(6): 930-944(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201706010.htm [17] 施振生, 朱筱敏, 张亚雄, 等. 四川盆地上三叠统沉积储层研究进展与热点分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 784-800. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202104003.htmShi Z S, Zhu X M, Zhang Y X, et al. Research progress and hotspot analysis of the Upper Triassic sedimentary reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum and Natural Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 784-800(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202104003.htm [18] 周园园, 杨海风, 刘庆顺, 等. 黄河口凹陷BZ27构造沙河街组砂岩储层致密化与油气充注关系[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(1): 168-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201901018.htmZhou Y Y, Yang H F, Liu Q S, et al. The relationship between sandstone reservoir densification and oil and gas injection in the Shahejie Formation of BZ27 structure in the Huanghekou Depression[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(1): 168-175(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201901018.htm [19] 王晓晨, 罗静兰, 李文厚, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏77区块盒8下亚段致密砂岩储层低渗成因与优质储层形成机理[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(2): 174-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201802024.htmWang X C, Luo J L, Li W H, et al. Genesis of low permeability and formation mechanism of high-quality reservoirs in the lower sub-segment of the He 8 tight sandstone reservoir in the Su 77 block of the Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(2): 174-182(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201802024.htm [20] Qian W D, Yin T J, Zhang C M, et al. Diagenetic evolution of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag, the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 1-16. http://www.socolar.com/Article/Index?aid=200259935745&jid=200000073720 [21] Ding X, Han M, Zhang S. The role of provenance in the diagenesis of siliciclastic reservoirs in the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Science, 2013, 10(2): 149-160. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=45691644 [22] 谢升洪, 李伟, 冷福, 等. 致密砂岩油藏可动流体赋存规律及制约因素研究: 以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆油田长6段储层为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(5): 105-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201905011.htmXie S H, Li W, Leng F, et al. Study on the occurrence patterns and limiting factors of movable fluids in tight sandstone reservoirs: Taking the Chang 6 reservoir of Huaqing Oilfield in the Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(5): 105-114(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201905011.htm [23] 张莉, 舒志国, 何生, 等. 川东建南地区须家河组储层特征及其差异演化过程[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(9): 3139-3156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202109008.htmZhang L, Shu Z G, He S, et al. Reservoir characteristics and differential evolution process of the Xujiahe Formation in the Jiannan area of eastern Sichuan[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(9): 3139-3156(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202109008.htm [24] Milliken K L. Late diagenesis and mass transfer in sandstone shale sequences[J]. Treatiseon Geochemistry, 2003, 7: 159-190. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080437516070912 [25] 杜春阳, 唐闻强, 杜秋定, 等. 柴达木盆地冷湖地区侏罗系致密砂岩储层特征与控制因素[J/OL]. 沉积与特提斯地质, https://doi.org/10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.12011 .Du C Y, Tang W Q, Du Q D, et al. Characteristics and control factors of Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs in the Lenghu area of the Qaidam Basin[J/OL]. Sedimentary and Tethyan Geology,https://doi.org/10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2021.12011 (in Chinese with English abstract).[26] 许晗, 刘明洁, 张庄, 等. 四川盆地川西坳陷须家河组三段致密砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(3): 344-357. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202203002.htmXu H, Liu M J, Zhang Z, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Third Member of Xujiahe Formation in Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(3): 344-357(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202203002.htm [27] 郭迎春, 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 等. 川西坳陷中段须二段致密砂岩储层致密化与相对优质储层发育机制[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2012, 42(增刊2): 21-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2012S2004.htmGuo Y C, Pang X Q, Chen D X, et al. The densification and relative high-quality reservoir development mechanism of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Xu-2 Member of the middle section of the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(S2): 21-32(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2012S2004.htm [28] 苗凤彬, 曾联波, 祖克威, 等. 四川盆地梓潼地区须家河组储集层裂缝特征及控制因素[J]. 地质力学学报, 2016, 22(1): 76-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201601008.htmMiao F B, Zeng L B, Zu K W, et al. Characteristics and control factors of fractures in the Xujiahe Formation reservoir in the Zitong area of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2016, 22(1): 76-84(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLX201601008.htm [29] 于波, 罗小明, 乔向阳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长油气区山西组山2段储层物性影响因素[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 43(10): 3931-3937. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201210029.htmYu B, Luo X M, Qiao X Y, et al. Factors affecting the physical properties of reservoirs in the Shan-2 Member of the Shanxi Formation in the Yanchang oil and gas area of the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 43(10): 3931-3937(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201210029.htm [30] 季汉成, 翁庆萍, 杨潇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞-神木地区山西组成岩与沉积相耦合关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(6): 709-717. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200906007.htmJi H C, Weng Q P, Yang X, et al. Coupling relationship between compositional rocks and sedimentary facies in Shaanxi, Ansai-Shenmu area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(6): 709-717(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200906007.htm [31] 贾承造, 赵文智, 邹才能, 等. 岩性地层油气藏地质理论与勘探技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(3): 257-272. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200703002.htmJia C Z, Zhao W Z, Zou C N, et al. Geological theory and exploration technology of lithological stratigraphic oil and gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(3): 257-272(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200703002.htm [32] 付晶, 吴胜和, 付金华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组储层定量成岩相研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(2): 86-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201302013.htmFu J, Wu S H, Fu J H, et al. Quantitative diagenetic facies study of the Yanchang Formation reservoir in the Longdong area of the Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2013, 20(2): 86-97(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201302013.htm [33] 钟大康, 祝海华, 孙海涛, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(2): 61-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201302010.htmZhong D K, Zhu H H, Sun H T, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Longdong area of Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2013, 20(2): 61-68(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201302010.htm [34] 楚美娟, 郭正权, 齐亚林, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8储层定量化成岩作用及成岩相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(3): 477-484. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201303006.htmChu M J, Guo Z Q, Qi Y L, et al. Quantitative diagenesis and diagenetic facies analysis of Chang 8 reservoir in Yanchang, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3): 477-484(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201303006.htm [35] 宫雪, 胡新友, 李文厚, 等. 成岩作用对储层致密化的影响差异及定量表述: 以苏里格气田苏77区块致密砂岩为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(6): 1338-1348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202006018.htmGong X, Hu X Y, Li W H, et al. Difference and quantitative expression of the influence of diagenesis on reservoir densification: Taking the tight sandstone in Su 77 block of Sulige Gas Field as an example[J]. Journal of Sedimentation, 2020, 38(6): 1338-1348(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202006018.htm [36] 王玉善, 高天, 王金荣, 等. 歧北次凹深陷区沙河街组储层类型及次生孔隙成因研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2014, 1(3): 6-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201403003.htmWang Y H, Gao T, Wang J R, et al. A study on the reservoir types and secondary pore genesis of the Shahejie Formation in the Deep Depression of Qibei Sub-depression[J]. Unconventional Oil and Gas, 2014, 1(3): 6-10(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201403003.htm [37] 罗文军, 彭军, 杜敬安, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组二段致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化: 以大邑地区为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(2): 287-295, 301. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201202018.htmLuo W J, Peng J, Du J A, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir in the Second Member of Xujiahe Formation in Western Sichuan Depression: Taking Dayi area as an example[J]. Geology of Petroleum and Natural Gas, 2012, 33(2): 287-295, 301(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201202018.htm [38] 葛东升, 蔡振华, 刘灵童, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区太原组太2段致密砂岩储层孔隙结构及渗流特征分析[J]. 非常规油气, 2020, 7(6): 11-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ202006004.htmGe D S, Cai Z H, Liu L T, et al. Analysis of pore structure and seepage characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Taiyuan Formation of the Linxing area on the eastern edge of the Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil and Gas, 2020, 7(6): 11-17(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ202006004.htm [39] 丁晓琪, 张哨楠, 葛鹏莉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组储层成岩体系研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2011, 29(1): 97-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201101012.htmDing X Q, Zhang S N, Ge P L, et al. A study on the diagenetic system of the Yanchang Formation reservoir in the southeast of the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Sedimentology, 2011, 29(1): 97-104(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201101012.htm [40] 黄鑫, 段冬平, 刘彬彬, 等. 西湖凹陷花港组绿泥石成因及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2021, 51(3): 669-679. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202103003.htmHuang X, Duan D P, Liu B B, et al. The genesis of chlorite in the Huagang Formation of the Xihu Depression and its impact on reservoir properties[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2021, 51(3): 669-679(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ202103003.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 921
- PDF下载量: 67
- 被引次数: 0
