Characteristics and main controlling factors of the tight sandstone reservoirs around the paleo-uplift in the southern Tianshan area, Tarim Basin
-
摘要:
塔里木盆地天山南地区古隆起周缘砂岩储层发育的主控因素及致密化成因一直制约着该区的增储上产。综合利用薄片和阴极发光观察、物性测试、压汞分析等方法对下白垩统舒善河组-巴西盖组砂岩储层特征进行了研究, 明确了制约储层物性发育的主控因素。研究表明: 研究区目的层的孔隙度
φ 多 < 10%, 渗透率k < 1×10-3 μm2, 是典型的致密砂岩储层, 其中辫状河三角洲相砂岩储层的物性和孔隙结构均最好(φ =12.3%,k =60.4×10-3 μm2), 扇三角洲相砂岩次之(φ =6.9%,k =1.9×10-3 μm2), 滩坝相砂岩最差(φ =6.7%,k =0.34×10-3 μm2); 古隆起的演化控制了沉积相的差异, 同时也影响了砂岩的成岩作用, 辫状河三角洲和扇三角洲沉积环境水动力较强, 砂岩颗粒较粗, 受胶结作用弱, 因此孔隙度和渗透率较高; 滩坝相砂岩沉积时远离陆源输入, 颗粒较细, 水下古隆起的发育在成岩阶段控制了其较高含量的碳酸盐胶结物的形成, 堵塞孔喉, 显著降低砂岩储层物性, 导致砂岩呈现致密化。研究成果可以为天山南地区下白垩统致密油气的勘探开发提供参考。Abstract:Objective The main controlling factors and densification genesis of sandstone reservoirs around the paleo-uplift in the southern Tianshan area of the Tarim Basin have always restricted the increase in reserves and production in this area.
Methods By using thin section and cathode luminescence (CL) observations, physical property testing, mercury injection analysis, and other related methods, the characteristics of sandstone reservoirs in the Lower Cretaceous Baxigai and Shushanhe Formations were studied, and the main factors controlling the reservoir properties were also summarized.
Results The study draws the following conclusions: The porosity of the target layer in the study area is mostly less than 10%, and the permeability is less than 1×10-3 μm2, which is a typical tight sandstone reservoir. Among them, the braided river delta sandstones exhibit the best physical properties (
φ =12.3%,k =60.4×10-3 μm2) and pore structure, followed by the fan delta sandstones (φ =6.9%,k =1.9×10-3 μm2), while the lacustrine sand bar facies features the worst physical properties (φ =6.7%,k =0.34×10-3 μm2). The evolution of paleo-uplift controlled the differences between sedimentary facies and diagenetic processes. The sedimentary environment of braided river deltas and fan deltas has strong hydrodynamic forces, coarser particles, and weak cementation, so the porosity and permeability are high. In contrast, the lacustrine sand bar facies are far away from terrigenous input, the grains are fine, and the underwater paleo-uplift controlled the formation of carbonate cement with high contents in the diagenetic stage, which blocked the pore throat and reduced the physical properties of the sandstone reservoir.Conclusion These results provide a reference for petroleum exploration and development of the Lower Cretaceous successions in the southern Tianshan area.
-
图 2 天山南地区下白垩统沉积相演化图
Figure 2. Sedimentary facies evolution diagram of the Lower Cretaceous in the southern Tianshan area
图 3 天山南地区中生界地层综合柱状图(修改自文献[25])
Figure 3. Comprehensive histogram of the Mesozoic successions in the southern Tianshan area
图 4 天山南地区下白垩统砂岩三角分类图
Figure 4. Ternary classification plot of Lower Cretaceous sandstones in the southern Tianshan area
图 5 天山南地区下白垩统砂岩典型铸体薄片照片
a.QG1井，5 618.17 m，舒善河组，滩坝相，颗粒分选性一般，可见粒内溶孔；b.QG1井，5 626.21 m，舒善河组，滩坝相，颗粒分选性较好，呈定向排列，致密程度高，未见可测面孔率；c.QG1井，巴西盖组，5 601.69 m，辫状河三角洲相，颗粒分选性较差，磨圆较好，颗粒呈点接触，杂基含量较少，剩余粒间溶孔较多；d.QG1井，5 602.08 m，巴西盖组, 辫状河三角洲相，颗粒分选性较差，磨圆较好，剩余粒间溶孔较多；e.QG3井，5 893.58 m，舒善河组，扇三角洲相，粒内溶孔发育；f.QG3井，5 891.93 m，舒善河组，扇三角洲相，颗粒破裂发育，粒内溶孔和粒间溶孔发育
Figure 5. Typical casting sections thin photos of Lower Cretaceous sandstone in southern Tianshan area
图 6 天山南地区下白垩统砂岩渗透率-孔隙度交会图
Figure 6. Permeability-porosity crossplot of Lower Cretaceous sandstones in the southern Tianshan area
图 7 天山南地区舒善河组-巴西盖组砂岩物性频率分布图
Figure 7. Physical property frequency distribution map of Shushanhe-Baxigai Formation sandstone in the southern Tianshan area
图 8 天山南地区下白垩统砂岩孔隙结构参数频率分布图
Figure 8. Frequency distributions of pore structure parameters of Lower Cretaceous sandstone in the southern Tianshan area
图 9 研究区SQ1-SQ3层序厚度图
Figure 9. Sequence thickness from the SQ1 to SQ3 in the study area
图 10 研究区过古隆起位置的地震剖面图(剖面位置见图 9)
Figure 10. Seismic profiles crossing the paleo-uplift zone of the Xinhe and Qiaogu areas
图 11 天山南地区古隆起演化模式图
Figure 11. Paleo-uplift evolution model of the southern Tianshan area
图 12 天山南地区下白垩统不同沉积相内砂岩储层典型照片
a.QG1井，5 604.22 m，K1b，辫状河三角洲相，颗粒分选较差，磨圆较好，颗粒呈点接触，杂基含量较少，剩余粒间孔较多；b.XH2井，5 016.4 m，K1b，辫状河三角洲相，颗粒分选较差，磨圆较好，颗粒呈点接触，杂基含量较少，剩余粒间孔较多；c.QG1井，5 617.57 m，K1s，滩坝相，颗粒分选较好，致密程度高，未见可测面孔率；d.QG1井，5 622.15 m，K1s，滩坝相，颗粒分选中等，磨圆较差，可见粒间孔；e.QG3井，5 891.4 m，K1s，扇三角洲相，颗粒分选较差，呈次棱角状，可见粒间孔和溶蚀孔；f.QG4井，5 768.71 m，K1s，扇三角洲相，颗粒分选较好，呈次棱角状，可见粒间孔和溶蚀孔；K1b.巴西盖组；K1s.舒善河组
Figure 12. Typical photos of Lower Cretaceous sandstones with different sedimentary facies in the southern Tianshan area
图 13 天山南地区下白垩统砂储层物性与岩碳酸盐体积分数交会图
Figure 13. Cross-plot between reservoir properties and carbonate content of Lower Cretaceous sandstones in the southern Tianshan area
图 14 天山南地区下白垩统砂岩典型阴极发光照片
a.XH5井，SQ3，5 721.1 m，红棕色中细砂岩，钙质胶结物不发育；b.QG1井，SQ3，5 601.7 m，灰白色中细砂岩，钙质胶结物含量低；c.XH5井，SQ2，5 720.36 m，细粒长石岩屑砂岩，灰质5%，分布不均匀；d.QG1井，SQ2，5 605.28 m，灰白色细砂岩，钙质胶结物发育；e.XH1井，SQ1，5 691.4 m，粉砂岩，碳酸盐胶结物呈斑点状分布；f.QG101井，SQ1，5 692.93 m，灰白色细砂岩，钙质胶结物呈点状分布(方解石的阴极光为橙色或黄色)
Figure 14. Typical cathodeluminescence images of Lower Cretaceous sandstones in the southern Tianshan area
表 1 天山南地区舒善河组-巴西盖组不同粒度砂岩的平均物性统计
Table 1. Statistical table of average properties of sandstones with different grain sizes in the Shushanhe-Baxigai Formation in the southern Tianshan area
岩性 粗砂岩 中砂岩 细砂岩 粉砂岩 样品数 15 88 350 15 孔隙度/% 11.3 8.8 7.6 6.3 渗透率/10-3μm2 51.13 34.0 2.56 0.66 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 贾承造, 邹才能, 杨智, 等. 陆相油气地质理论在中国中西部盆地的重大进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 546-560. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804002.htmJIA C Z, ZOU C N, YANG Z, et al. Significant progress of continental petroleum geology theory in basins of central and western China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 546-560. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804002.htm [2] ZHU G Y, MILKOV A V, LI J F, et al. Deepest oil in Asia: Characteristics of petroleum system in the Tarim Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 199(4): 108246. [3] LI J G, PAUL P, MENG Z F, et al. Aromatic compounds in crude oils and source rocks and their application to oil source rock correlations in the Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 2005, 25: 251-268. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(04)00079-3 [4] LI M, WU G H, XIA B, et al. Controls on hydrocarbon accumulation in clastic reservoirs of the Tarim Craton, NW China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 104: 423-437. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.04.008 [5] 安海亭, 李海银, 王建忠, 等. 塔北地区构造和演化特征及其对油气成藏的控制[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(1): 142-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.01.019AN H T, LI H Y, WANG J Z, et al. Tectonic evolution and its controlling on oil and gas accumulation in the northern Tarim Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2009, 33(1): 142-147. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.01.019 [6] YANG F L, WANG T G, LI M J. Oil filling history of the Mesozoic oil reservoir in the Tabei Uplift of Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 142: 129-140. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.02.005 [7] WANG Y Y, CHEN J F, PANG X Q, et al. Faulting controls on oil and gas composition in the Yingmai 2 oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2018, 123: 48-66. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.04.007 [8] 郭小文, 刘可禹, 宋岩, 等. 库车坳陷克拉2气田油气充注和超压对储层孔隙的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(6): 935-943. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201606018.htmGUO X W, LIU K Y, SONG Y, et al. lnfuences of hydrocarbon charging and overpressure on reservoir porosity in Kela-2 gas field of the Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6): 935-943. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201606018.htm [9] 王珂, 张荣虎, 余朝丰, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(5): 623-635. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202005004.htmWANG K, ZHANG R H, YU C F, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of Jurassic Ahe reservoir of the northern tectonic belt, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(5): 623-635. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202005004.htm [10] 谢大庆, 郑孟林, 蒋华山, 等. 塔里木盆地沙雅隆起形成演化与油气分布规律[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2013, 37(3): 398-409. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2013.03.006XIE D Q, ZHENG M L, JIANG H S, et al. Formation and evolution of the Shaya Uplift and constraints on oil and gas distribution in the Tarim Basin[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2013, 37(3): 398-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2013.03.006 [11] 韩强, 李宗杰, 杨子川, 等. 塔里木盆地三道桥地区油气成藏特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(6): 14-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201506003.htmHAN Q, LI Z J, YANG Z C, et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Sandaoqiao area of Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(6): 14-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201506003.htm [12] 韩强, 杨子川, 李弘艳, 等. 塔里木盆地沙雅隆起北部三道桥潜山结构与储层特征[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2017, 39(1): 103-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX201701008.htmHAN Q, YANG Z C, LI H Y, et al. Characteristics of Sandaoqiao buried hill structure and reservoir in the northern Shaya Uplift of Tarim Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2017, 39(1): 103-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX201701008.htm [13] SUN D Q, LIU X P, LI W H, et al. Quantitative evaluation the physical properties evolution of sandstone reservoirs constrained by burial and thermal evolution reconstruction: A case study from the Lower Cretaceous Baxigai Formation of the western Yingmaili area in the Tabei Uplift, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109460. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109460 [14] 徐桂芬, 林畅松, 刘永福, 等. 塔北西部早白垩世卡普沙良群沉积期古隆起演化及其对沉积的控制作用[J]. 地球科学, 2016, 41(4): 619-632. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201604007.htmXU G F, LIN C S, LIU Y F, et al. Evolution of paleo-uplift and its controlling on sedimentation of Kapushaliang Group of Early Cretaceous in western Tabei Uplift[J]. Earth Science, 2016, 41(4): 619-632. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201604007.htm [15] 孙东权, 李文浩, 卢双舫, 等. 塔北隆起英买力地区舒善河组储层特征与控制因素[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44(6): 82-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202006009.htmSUN D Q, LI W H, LU S F, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Shushanhe Formation in Yingmaili area of Tabei Uplift[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2020, 44(6): 82-93. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202006009.htm [16] 杨海军, 刘永福, 苏洲, 等. 塔北隆起深层碎屑岩优质储层形成主控因素[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(1): 169-179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP202001015.htmYANG H J, LIU Y F, SU Z, et al. The main controlling factors for the formation of high quality clastic reservoirs in deeply buried strata of Tabei Uplift[J]. Geological Review, 2020, 66(1): 169-179. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP202001015.htm [17] 曾联波, 朱如凯, 高志勇, 等. 构造成岩作用及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油科学通报, 2016, 1(2): 191-197. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKE201602002.htmZENG L B, ZHU R K, GAO Z Y, et al. Structural diagenesis and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016, 1(2): 191-197. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKE201602002.htm [18] 何云, 王瑞飞, 张占杨, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层孔隙结构及可动流体特征[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(5): 94-102. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0134HE Y, WANG R F, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Pore structure and movable fluid characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Lower Shihezi Formation in the Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(5): 94-102. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0134 [19] WANG R, SHI W Z, XIE X Y, et al. Clay mineral content, type, and their effects on pore throat structure and reservoir properties: Insight from the Permian tight sandstones in the Hangjinqi area, north Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 115: 104281. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104281 [20] QIN S, WANG R, SHI W Z, et al. Diverse effects of intragranular fractures on reservoir properties, diagenesis, and gas migration: Insight from Permian tight sandstone in the Hangjinqi area, north Ordos Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 137: 105526. [21] 覃硕, 石万忠, 王任, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区盒一段致密砂岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1604-1618. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202205006.htmQIN S, SHI W Z, WANG R, et al. Characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs and their controlling factors of He-1 Member in Hangjinqi block, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(5): 1604-1618. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202205006.htm [22] 周红涛. 天山南地区碳酸盐岩储层测井评价[J]. 新疆地质, 2013, 31(增刊1): 50-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI2013S1013.htmZHOU H T. Logging evaluation of carbonate reservoir of the southern Tianshan area[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2013, 31(S1): 50-55. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI2013S1013.htm [23] 贾存善. 塔里木盆地沙雅隆起油气成因及运移方向研究[D]. 中国矿业大学(北京), 2012.JIA C S. Studies on origins and migration direction of petroleum in Shaya Uplift of Tarim Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) [24] 李德江, 易士威, 冉启贵, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东秋里塔格构造样式及勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 584-590. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201604003.htmLI D J, YI S W, RAN Q G, et al. Structural characters and potentiality of the east Qiulitage anticline belt in Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(4): 584-590. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201604003.htm [25] 吴高奎, 林畅松, 刘永福, 等. 库车-塔北地区中生代关键变革期主要不整合及古隆起地貌特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 763-777. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201904008.htmWU G K, LIN C S, LIU Y F, et al. Characteristics of major unconformities and paleo-geomorphology during the Mesozoic key transformation stages in Kuqa-Tabei area[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 763-777. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201904008.htm [26] FOLK R L, ANDREWS P B, LEWIS D W. Detrital sedimentary rock classification and nomenclature for use in New Zealand[J]. New Zealand Journal of Geology & Geophysics, 1970, 13: 937-968. [27] 邹才能, 陶士振, 侯连华, 等. 非常规油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011.ZOU C N, TAO S Z, HOU L H, et al. Non-conventional oil and gas geology[M], Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011. (in Chinese) [28] 刘凯, 石万忠, 王任, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区盒1段致密砂岩孔隙结构分形特征及其与储层物性的关系[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 57-68. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0102LIU K, SHI W Z, WANG R, et al. Pore structure fractal characteristics and its relationship with reservoir properties of the First Member of Lower Shihezi Formation tight sandstone in Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 57-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0102 [29] HE B Z, JIAO C L, XU Z Q, et al. The paleotectonic and paleogeography reconstructions of the Tarim Basin and its adjacent areas(NW China)during the late Early and Middle Paleozoic[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 30: 191-206. [30] LIU K, WANG R, SHI W Z, et al. Tectonic controls on Permian tight gas accumulation: Constrains from fluid inclusion and paleo-structure reconstruction in the Hangjinqi area, northern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 83: 103616. [31] 李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1506-1517. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201810012.htmLI G X, YI S W, LIN S G, et al. Reservoir characteristics and major factors influencing the reservoir quality of Lower Jurassic in eastern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(10): 1506-1517. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201810012.htm [32] 钟大康, 朱筱敏, 王红军. 中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2008, 38(增刊1): 11-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2008S1002.htmZHONG D K, ZHU X M, WANG H J. Characteristics and formation mechanism of deep quality clastic reservoirs in China[J]. Science China(Earth Science), 2008, 38(S1): 11-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2008S1002.htm [33] ZHANG L, BAO Z D, DOU L X, et al. Diagenetic alterations related to sedimentary architecture of deltaic distributary channels in red beds of the Cretaceous Yaojia Formation, Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 203: 108564. [34] 顾家裕, 贾进华. 方辉. 塔里木盆地储层特征与高孔隙度、高渗透率储层成因[J]. 科学通报, 2002, 47(增刊1): 9-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB2002S1001.htmGU J Y, JIA J H, FANG H. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of high porosity and permeability reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(S1): 9-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB2002S1001.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 310
- PDF下载量: 67
- 被引次数: 0
