Development Status and Trend Analysis of Physical Simulation Experiments for Geological Hazards
-
摘要: 【意义】在近20年中,地质灾害物理仿真实验呈现出学科交叉、应用广泛、更新迅速的发展现状。开展地质灾害物理仿真实验发展现状及趋势分析,有助于让相关研究人员掌握行业现状并根据发展趋势设计实验、研发设备、更新技术,促进地质灾害关键理论的创新发展。【分析】本论文调研大量的国内外地质灾害物理仿真实验相关文献,总结了开展地质灾害物理仿真实验的5个意义,并对6个物理仿真关键技术逐一进行现状分析。其中模型箱和水槽是应用最广泛的仿真技术。底摩擦仿真技术在二维场景中实现了模型与重力场的耦合;振动台和离心机技术可为仿真实验提供振动与重力环境,在物理仿真实验中发挥着不可替代的作用。原位仿真技术在避免缩尺效应、边界效应、重力失真等方面具有显著优势。【展望】地质灾害物理仿真实验正朝着场景构建复杂化、实验规模大型化、材料选择科学化和数据采集智能化的方向发展,这对实验技术与经济成本提出了更高的要求,亟需营造良性发展环境,让物理仿真技术在地质灾害研究中的发挥出更大作用。Abstract: [Significance] In the past 20 years, physical simulation experiments of geological hazards have developed rapidly, forming an interdisciplinary, widely applied, and rapidly updated development status. Analyzing the current status and trends of physical simulation experiments for geological hazards can help researchers in related fields grasp the industry's current situation, design experiments, develop equipment, and update technologies based on development trends, providing rich and reliable experimental and data for theoretical innovations in geological hazards. [Progress] The paper has conducted extensive research on literature related to physical simulation experiments of geological hazards, and summarized five significances of conducting physical simulation experiments of geological hazards. Then, the research status of the six technologies for geological hazard simulation experiments is analyzed. Model box and flume simulation technology have the characteristics of diverse combinations, low prices, easy installation, and simple operation, and are the most widely used physical simulation technologies for geological hazards. The base friction technology achieves coupling between the simulation model and the gravity field at a low cost, but simulation experiments can only be conducted on two-dimensional slope models. Shaking table and centrifuge simulation technology have high construction and usage costs, but due to their ability to provide vibration and gravity environments for the experimental process, these two technologies are still irreplaceable in geological hazard physics simulation experiments. In situ simulation technology has the drawbacks of long experimental cycles, difficult model production, high personnel input, low automation level, and poor repeatability, but it has significant advantages in avoiding scaling effects, boundary effects, and gravity distortion. [Conclusions and Prospect] The physical simulation experiments for geological hazards are developing towards complex scene construction, large-scale experiments, scientific material selection, and intelligent data collection. This puts higher requirements on experimental technology and economic costs, and there is an urgent need to create a favorable development environment for physical simulation experiments of geological hazards so that physical simulation technology can play a greater role in geological hazard research.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 70
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0