Indication of elements geochemical characteristics of stream sediment to evaluation of regional denudation degree: A case study of the Dachang gold ore field in east Kunlun, Qinghai Province
-
摘要: 利用水系沉积物测量元素地球化学的相关特征，对青海东昆仑大场金矿集中区开展矿床、矿田尺度的剥蚀程度研究，可以为评价区域成矿潜力提供有力支撑，具有快速、有效、低成本的优点。选取青海省东昆仑大场金矿田的1∶5万水系沉积物测量数据进行了处理和分析，以热液渗滤晕分带理论为指导，依据区内金矿床原生晕在空间的分带性和次生异常的结构相似性，建立了整体成矿元素分散流与原生晕共性的元素组合和元素分带序列，分别采用了元素比值法、三角图解法和元素分带序列法来选取区域剥蚀程度评价参数，并结合实地地质矿产特征，评价了大场金矿田及周边地区7个异常区的剥蚀程度大小。研究结果表明：扎拉依北、格涌贡玛、东达哈日乌拉、照大额北地区的剥蚀程度较高；旁海、启得喜然地区的剥蚀程度中等；扎拉依-大场、照大额南地区的剥蚀程度一般；同时利用水系沉积物元素地球化学特征，多种评价指标的对比使用，可以有效快速地对区域剥蚀程度开展评价，为成矿潜力评价提供支持，对找矿勘查具有十分重要的指示意义。Abstract: Using the elements geochemical characteristics in stream sediments survey, have the advantages of yofast, effective and low cost in different scale evaluation of denudation degree in Dachang gold ore field in east Kunlun, Qinghai Province.It also provides strong support for evaluating the regional metallogenic potential.We take a case study of the data of 1∶50 000 stream sediments survey in the Dachang gold ore field for processing and analysis, which is based on the theory of hydrothermal percolation halo banding, and the spatial zoning of the primary halo and the structural similarity with secondary anomalies of gold deposits in the area.Besides, we build the element association and elemental banding sequence with common features between the common mineralization element dispersed train and the primary halo.Three methods, including the elemental ratio method, the triangular graphic method and the elemental banding sequence method are used to set up the evaluation parameters of regional denudation degree.Finally, combined with the characteristics of the geology and mineral resources in the field, the denudation degree of 7 anomalous areas in the Dachang gold ore field and surrounding areas is evaluated, and it is believed that the denudation degree of Zalayibei, Geyonggongma, Dongda Hariwula, and Zhaodaebei areas is higher; the degree of denudation in the Dexiran area is medium; the degree of denudation in the Zarayi-Dachang and Zhaodaenan areas is lower.Meanwhile, it is believed that the use of the elemental geochemical characteristics of stream sediments and the combined use of multiple evaluation indicators can effectively and quickly carry out a moderate evaluation of the degree of regional denudation, provide support for the evaluation of mineralization potential, and have very important indications for prospecting and exploration.
-
图 1 大场金矿田地质简图
Q.第四系；T3q.上三叠统清水河组；T2gd2.中三叠统甘德组上段；T2gd1.中三叠统甘德组下段；T1-2c3、T1-2c2、T1-2c1.下-中三叠统昌马河组上、中、下段；P2m.中二叠统马尔争组。1.扎拉依陇洼金矿点；2.旁海金矿点；3.加给陇洼金矿床；4.扎拉依金矿床；5.照大额南金矿点；6.稍日哦金矿床；7.格涌尕玛考金矿点；8.大场金矿床；9.大东沟金矿床；10.扎家同哪金矿床
Figure 1. Geological sketch map of Dachang gold ore field
图 3 大场金矿田单元素异常图
Figure 3. Geochemical anomaly maps of single element in the Dachang gold field area
图 4 大场金矿田元素浓集系数比值等值线剥蚀程度图
A.(KW+KMo+KBi)/(KAs+KSb+KHg)等值线图；B.(KW+KMo+KBi)/(KCu+KPb+KZn)等值线图；矿床(点)编号同图 1
Figure 4. Contour map of element concentration coefficient ratios showing denudation degree of Dachang gold ore field
图 5 大场金矿田组合异常示意图及各异常区剥蚀程度三角图
矿床(点)编号同图 1；Ⅰ~Ⅶ为异常区编号：Ⅰ.东达哈日乌拉; Ⅱ.格涌贡玛; Ⅲ.扎拉依北; Ⅳ.照大额北; Ⅴ.照大额南; Ⅵ.旁海; Ⅶ.扎拉依-大场
Figure 5. Sketch map of anomaly belt and triangular diagram showing denudation degree of Dachang ore field
图 6 大场金矿田水系沉积物采样点位及Au、As、Sb、Hg元素质量分数图
Figure 6. Sketch map showing the sampling position and abundances of Au, As, Sb, Hg in sediments of drainage network of Dachang gold ore field
图 7 大场金矿田不同矿区矿化下限标高变化趋势示意图
Figure 7. Sketch map showing the regularities of gold mineralization varying with elevation in different mining area of Dachang gold ore field
图 8 扎拉依-大场地区组合异常示意图
1.扎拉依陇洼金矿点；2.加给陇洼金矿床；3.扎拉依金矿床；4.稍日哦金矿床；5.格涌尕玛考金矿点；6.大场金矿床；7.大东沟金矿床；8.扎家同哪金矿床
Figure 8. Sketch map of anomaly belt of Zhalayi-Dachang area
表 1 研究区异常元素NAP值序列和水平分带序列
Table 1. Sequence of anomalies element NAP value and horizontal zonality sequence in Dachang gold ore field
异常区名称 异常元素NAP值序列 异常元素水平分带序列 东达哈日乌拉(Ⅰ) Sb21.9-Sn18.6-Bi9.1 Sn-Bi-Sb 格涌贡玛(Ⅱ) Sn132.4-Zn129.1-Bi57.3-Cu19.4-Mo15.7 Sn-Zn-Bi-Cu-Mo 扎拉依北(Ⅲ) W49.2-Zn23.3-Sn19.8-Mo12.5-Cu7.2 W-Zn-Sn-Mo-Cu 照大额北(Ⅳ) Zn172.4-Sn98.1-Cu89.7-Bi65.0-Mo25.7-W24.1-Sb6.7 Zn-Sn-Cu-Bi-Mo-W-Sb 照大额南(Ⅴ) Pb161.0-Zn123.0-Sn36.6-Cu15.0-Au12.3-Bi11.2 Pb-Zn-Sn-Cu-Au-Bi 旁海(Ⅵ) Au57.9-Mo48.1-W22.0-Zn13.1-Cu11.8 Au-Zn-Cu-Mo-W 扎拉依-大场(Ⅶ) a：Sb172.4-Mo171.4-As113.1-Au98.0-Zn91.9-W70.9-Sn54.5-Cu46.6-Bi40.6 Sb-As-Au-Zn-Cu-Mo-W-Sn-Bi b：Au152.3-As121.4-Sb98.0-W52.7-Sn45-Zn22.5-Cu21.2-Bi12.2 Sb-Au-As-Zn-Cu-W-Sn-Bi 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 袁万明, 莫宣学, 王世成, 等. 东昆仑金成矿作用与区域构造演化的关系[J]. 地质与勘探, 2003, 39(3): 5-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT200303001.htm [2] 翟玉林, 魏俊浩, 李艳军, 等. 青海大场金矿床地质地球化学找矿模型[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(6): 100-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201506014.htm [3] 庄玉军, 曹新志, 黄良伟, 等. 矿床剥蚀程度研究现状综述[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(1): 171-177. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2014.01.015 [4] 徐伯骏, 费小丽, 曹新志, 等. 新疆伊犁阿希金矿床成矿深度和剥蚀程度分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(3): 154-162. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201403022.htm [5] 魏俊浩. 初论成矿场与矿产勘查意义[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(1): 114-129 http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9932.shtml [6] Cheng Q M. Mapping singularities with stream sediment geochemical data for prediction of undiscovered mineral deposits inGejiu, Yunnan Province, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2007, 32(1/2): 314-324. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136806001119 [7] Cheng Q M, Zhao P D. Singularity theories and methods for characterizing mineralization processes and mapping geo-anomalies for mineral deposit prediction[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2011, 2(1): 67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2010.12.003 [8] Cheng Q M. Singularity theory and methods for mapping geochemical anomalies caused by buried sources and for predicting undiscovered mineral deposits in covered areas[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2012, 122: 55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.07.007 [9] Zuo R G, Carranza E J M, Wang J. Spatial analysis and visualization of exploration geochemical data[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 158: 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.04.006 [10] 于家明, 张辉, 陆学普, 等. 区域化探异常元素分带与找矿远景分析[J]. 吉林地质, 2007, 26(2): 37-46, 62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2427.2007.02.008 [11] 耿国帅. 安徽绩溪东部化探工作区剥蚀程度及主攻矿种浅析[J]. 矿床地质, 2010, 29(增刊2): 173-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ2010S2028.htm [12] 黄文斌, 罗先熔, 刘攀峰, 等. 青海省石灰沟地区水系沉积物测量地球化学特征及找矿预测[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(3): 150-159. http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10032.shtml [13] 贾琳, 石文杰, 魏俊浩, 等. 水平总梯度法在化探异常圈定中的应用: 以青海省某地区1∶5万水系沉积物地球化学测量为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(5): 71-80 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201905007.htm [14] 李胜荣, 侯增谦. 西藏冈底斯带区域性断裂与金矿床剥蚀程度: Ag/Au比值的启示[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2001, 31(B12): 104-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2001S1015.htm [15] 姜启明, 鲁挑建. 甘肃金山金矿床伴生元素特征及矿床剥蚀程度研究[J]. 黄金, 2011, 32(10): 10-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJZZ201110005.htm [16] 康太翰, 于洪顺. 利用异常元素水平分带序列评价矿床剥蚀程度: 以兰家、八台岭、官马金矿为例[J]. 吉林地质, 1997, 16(1): 57-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLDZ701.007.htm [17] 金献革. 矿床原生晕元素空间分带序列计算方法研究[J]. 科技与企业, 2012(20): 274-275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJYQ201220257.htm [18] Singer D A, Kouda R. Some simple guides to finding useful information in exploration geochemical data[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2001, 10(2): 137-147. doi: 10.1023/A:1011552810482 [19] Ding Q F, Jiang S Y, Sun F Y, et al. Origin of the Dachang gold deposit, NW China: Constraints from H, O, S, and Pb isotope data[J]. International Geology Review, 2013, 55(15): 1885-1901. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2013.804687 [20] 夏锐, 邓军, 卿敏, 等. 青海大场金矿田矿床成因: 流体包裹体地球化学及H-O同位素的约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(4): 1358-1376. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201304021.htm [21] 王发明, 翟玉林, 李艳军, 等. 青海大场金矿田北缘灭格滩矿区土壤地球化学异常信息提取及找矿预测[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(5): 127-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201505020.htm [22] Ding Q F, Wang G, Sun F Y. Ore-forming fluid evolution of Dachang gold deposit in Qumalai County, Qinghai Province: Evidence from fluid inclusion study and arsenopyrite geothermometer[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2010, 26(12): 3709-3719. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/305534009_Ore-forming_fluid_evolution_of_Dachang_gold_deposit_in_Qumalai_County_Qinghai_Province_Evidence_from_fluid_inclusion_study_and_arsenopyrite_geothennometer [23] 赵财胜, 孙丰月, 毛景文, 等. 青海大场金矿床流体包裹体特征及其地质意义[J]. 矿床地质, 2005, 24(3): 305-316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200503009.htm [24] 李琳业, 俞长捷, 戴梅芳, 等. 青海省大场金矿床地质特征及找矿远景分析[J]. 青海大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 27(1): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXZ200901003.htm [25] Wang S L, Qu C X, Liu W. Geophysical-geochemical anomaly characteristics and prospecting marks of Dachang gold deposit in Qinghai[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 448/453: 3792-3796. [26] 李惠, 张文华, 刘宝林, 等. 中国主要类型金矿床的原生晕轴向分带序列研究及其应用准则[J]. 地质与勘探, 1999, 35(1): 3-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT901.008.htm [27] 蒋敬业, 程建萍, 祁士华, 等. 应用地球化学[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2006: 68. [28] Vilà M, Martínez-Lladó X. Approaching earth surface geochemical variability from representative samples of geological units: The Congost River Basin case study[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 148: 79-95. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674214003008 [29] 骆地伟, 姚书振, 王成相, 等. 黔西南卡林型金矿剥蚀程度评价[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2016, 41(2): 199-217. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201602003.htm [30] 向运川. 化探资料应用技术要求[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010. [31] 陈静. 青海省大场金矿矿床地质特征及其成因意义[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2012. [32] Xie S Y, Cheng Q M, Xing X T, et al. Geochemical multifractal distribution patterns in sediments from ordered streams[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 160(1): 36-46. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706110000352 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 867
- PDF下载量: 966
- 被引次数: 0
