鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区盒1段致密砂岩孔隙结构分形特征及其与储层物性的关系

刘凯; 石万忠; 王任; 覃硕

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0102

鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区盒1段致密砂岩孔隙结构分形特征及其与储层物性的关系

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0102

刘凯^{a, b,},
石万忠^{a, b, ,},
王任^{a, b},
覃硕^{a, b}

基金项目:

十三五油气重大专项"鄂尔多斯盆地北缘低丰度致密低渗气藏开发关键技术" 2016ZX05048-002

详细信息

作者简介:
刘凯(1993-), 男, 现正攻读矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位, 主要从事致密储层评价研究工作。E-mail:1298483801@qq.com

通讯作者:
石万忠(1973-), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事非常规油气储层评价工作。E-mail:875375526@qq.com

中图分类号: P618.13
计量
- 文章访问数: 1031
- PDF下载量: 5070
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-09-16

Pore structure fractal characteristics and its relationship with reservoir properties of the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation tight sandstone in Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin

Liu Kai^{a, b
,},
Shi Wanzhong^{a, b
, ,},
Wang Ren^{a, b},
Qin Shuo^{a, b}

摘要

摘要: 基于物性、铸体薄片、电镜扫描和高压压汞等测试分析资料，利用汞饱和度法和含水饱和度法对杭锦旗地区盒1段致密储层孔隙结构分形维数进行了计算，并分析其与储层物性的关系。结果表明：盒1段储层平均孔隙度、渗透率分别为9.83%、1.03×10^-3 μm²，储集空间以粒间溶孔、粒内溶孔和残余粒间孔为主。汞饱和度法计算的整体分形维数分布在2.138 4~2.829 2，平均值为2.396 5，含水饱和度法计算的整体分形维数分布在2.529 4~2.879 7，平均值为2.679 1。相比于含水饱和度法，汞饱和度法计算的分形维数与孔隙度、渗透率及各孔隙结构参数之间具有更好的相关性，是因为含水饱和度法易对孔喉较小的样品产生偏差。基于汞饱和度法分形维数，将盒1段储层孔隙结构分为四类：Ⅰ类（D_f≤2.31），Ⅱ类（2.31 < D_f < 2.4），Ⅲ类（2.4≤D_f < 2.52），Ⅳ类（D_f≥2.52），研究区主要孔隙结构类型为Ⅱ、Ⅲ类。选取分形维数（D_f）、平均孔喉半径（R_m）和孔隙度（φ）等参数，对渗透率进行多元回归计算，计算值与实测值相关系数在0.9以上，表明计算模型在本区较为适用。
- 杭锦旗地区 /
- 孔隙结构 /
- 分形特征 /
- 高压压汞 /
- 汞饱和度法
Abstract: Based on physical property, casting thin section, scanning electron microscope, high-pressure mercury injection and other test analysis data, the fractal dimension of pore structure of tight sandstone reservoir was calculated by the method of mercury saturation and water saturation in the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area, and the relationship between fractal dimension and the physical properties of reservoir was analyzed.The results have shown that the average porosity and permeability of the Lower Shihezi Formation reservoir were 9.83% and 1.03×10^-3 μm², respectively.The reservoir space is mainly composed of intergranular dissolved pores, intragronular dissolved pores and residual intergranular pores.The overall fractal dimension calculated by the mercury saturation method is distributed in 2.138 4-2.829 2 with an average value of 2.396 5 while calculated by the water saturation method is distributed in 2.529 4-2.879 7 with an average value of 2.679 1.Compared with the water saturation method, the fractal dimension calculated by the mercury saturation method has a better correlation with the porosity, permeability and pore structure parameters, because the water saturation method tends to produce deviation on samples with smaller pore throat.The pore structure was divided into four types based on fractal dimension: Type Ⅰ(D_f≤2.31), Type Ⅱ(2.31 < D_f < 2.4), Type Ⅲ(2.4≤D_f < 2.52), Ⅳ(D_f≥2.52).Fractal dimension(D_f), averoged radius of pore throct(R_m) and porosity(φ) were selected to calculate permeability by multiple nonlinear regression.The calculated permeability by multiple nonlinear regression shows strong correlation with measured permeability, whose correlation coefficient squared is more than 0.9, which means the permeability estimation model is suitable for the study area.
- Hangjinqi area /
- pore structure /
- fractal characteristic /
- high pressure mercury injection /
- mercury saturation method

HTML全文

图 1 杭锦旗地区构造位置及地层综合柱状图

Figure 1. Tectonic location and generalized stratigraphy of the Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 杭锦旗地区盒1段储层物性特征

Figure 2. Reservoir properties of the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 杭锦旗地区盒1段砂岩分类

Figure 3. Sandstone classification of the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 杭锦旗地区盒1段储层储集空间类型

A.锦62井，3 455.94 m，残余粒间孔和粒间溶孔，单偏光；B.锦27井，2 265.4 m，长石溶孔沿节理发育，单偏光；C.锦7井，2 821 m，蜂窝状岩屑溶孔，裂缝穿过岩屑颗粒，单偏光；D.锦126井，2 933.48 m，溶蚀强烈，发育铸膜孔和超大复合孔；E.锦27井，2 319.45 m，贴粒缝和粒内缝，单偏光；F.锦89井，3 087.05 m，残余粒间孔；G.锦75井，2 753.99 m，粒内溶孔；H.锦89井，3 082.34 m，自生高岭石晶间孔，具一定连通性；I.锦89井，3 082.34 m，伊利石与绿泥石晶间孔

Figure 4. Reservoir space types of the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 汞饱和度法计算的典型分形曲线

Figure 5. Representative fractal curve calculated by mercury saturation method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 含水饱和度法计算的典型分形曲线

Figure 6. Representative fractal curve calculated by water saturation method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 汞饱和度法分形维数与储层物性关系

Figure 7. Relationship between reservoir properties and fractal dimension calculated by mercury saturation method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 含水饱和度法分形维数与储层物性关系

Figure 8. Relationship between reservoir properties and fractal dimension calculated by water saturation method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 汞饱和度法分形维数与孔隙结构参数关系

Figure 9. Relationship between pore structure parameters and fractal dimension calculated by mercury saturation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 4类储层毛管压力曲线和孔喉半径分布特征

Figure 10. Capillary pressure curves and pore throat radius distributions for four types of reservoir

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 盒1段储层实测渗透率与孔隙度及计算渗透率的关系

Figure 11. Relationship between measured permeability vs. porosity and calculated permeability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 盒1段致密储层孔隙结构分形维数计算结果

Table 1. Fractal dimension of first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation tight sandstone reservoir

样品编号	孔隙度/%	渗透率/10^-3 μm²	汞饱和度法分形维数			含水饱和度法分形维数
样品编号	孔隙度/%	渗透率/10^-3 μm²	D₁	D₂	D_f	D₁	D₂	D_f
J116-1	0.1	0.148	/	/	2.829 2	2.942 7	2.746 4	2.844 6
J122-3	9.0	1.640	/	/	2.372 7	2.855 8	2.430 5	2.643 2
J32-6	3.9	0.802	/	/	2.440 2	2.931 7	2.627 1	2.779 4
J33-6	10.0	1.340	/	/	2.417 5	2.795 8	2.335 0	2.565 4
J7-6	5.9	1.500	/	/	2.409 3	2.913 8	2.468 0	2.690 9
J74-5	14.3	5.830	/	/	2.168 0	2.709 6	2.605 2	2.664 4
J77-6	5.8	1.090	/	/	2.471 3	2.901 5	2.462 5	2.639 3
J102-2	9.8	1.900	2.474 8	2.129 7	2.302 3	2.708 7	2.533 4	2.649 4
J102-5	11.6	3.480	2.217 8	2.084 0	2.150 7	2.708 7	2.533 4	2.678 0
J102-6	6.6	0.574	2.593 8	2.152 3	2.373 1	2.672 0	2.515 2	2.623 3
J107-2	5.4	0.942	2.502 8	2.331 1	2.417 0	2.831 7	2.085 5	2.577 1
J107-5	6.4	2.090	2.524 3	2.275 5	2.399 9	2.810 8	2.506 3	2.698 8
J107-8	1.2	0.165	2.877 2	2.495 9	2.686 6	2.901 9	2.622 8	2.754 3
J107-9	6.6	0.921	2.503 6	2.263 2	2.383 4	2.803 3	2.513 7	2.698 0
J107-13	9.7	1.020	2.496 3	2.200 9	2.348 6	2.712 3	2.310 4	2.556 2
J107-16	2.0	0.616	2.558 2	2.495 9	2.527 1	2.927 9	2.711 6	2.805 6
J122-5	1.8	0.577	2.800 6	2.274 6	2.537 6	2.940 5	2.801 1	2.879 7
J126-2	17.0	11.340	2.385 7	2.035 0	2.210 4	2.493 1	2.770 0	2.529 4
J126-4	14.8	3.920	2.404 2	2.086 0	2.244 2	2.632 2	2.689 0	2.641 3
J27-3	12.6	1.860	2.566 8	2.086 1	2.326 5	2.664 5	2.536 9	2.625 7
J27-7	13.4	5.840	2.648 7	2.122 5	2.385 6	2.668 7	2.486 9	2.611 1
J30-3	6.10	2.23	2.498 0	2.179 2	2.338 6	2.801 2	2.627 2	2.726 3
J30-5	9.20	1.42	2.499 8	2.174 2	2.337 0	2.765 6	2.471 6	2.641 3
J33-4	13.80	1.94	2.412 0	2.141 0	2.276 5	2.827 3	2.366 4	2.610 8
J39-4	15.00	6.44	2.374 1	2.055 6	2.214 9	2.586 2	2.749 6	2.604 5
J44-4	13.00	8.79	2.376 6	2.064 0	2.220 3	2.613 0	2.769 3	2.631 4
J62-3	4.40	0.69	2.594 5	2.123 8	2.359 2	2.707 4	2.665 6	2.695 0
J62-5	10.70	4.54	2.554 2	2.048 9	2.301 6	2.510 3	2.794 2	2.537 6
J7-4	4.50	0.74	2.625 4	2.343 6	2.484 5	2.908 8	2.731 2	2.818 7
J7-10	2.90	0.52	2.625 4	2.352 2	2.488 8	2.904 2	2.688 2	2.791 6
J91-6	1.60	0.95	2.490 6	2.263 5	2.377 1	2.926 7	2.657 9	2.821 0
J91-8	7.80	1.65	2.608 9	2.156 1	2.382 5	2.809 6	2.629 8	2.728 4
J91-10	4.90	1.09	2.616 7	2.160 1	2.388 4	2.851 2	2.773 7	2.816 0
J91-13	4.50	1.18	2.616 7	2.231 2	2.424 0	2.844 7	2.571 3	2.703 0
J98-2	13.50	7.25	2.550 9	2.064 5	2.307 7	2.567 8	2.784 9	2.589 6

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 孔隙结构参数与物性及分形维数相关性

Table 2. Relationship between pore structure parameters and reservoir property and fractal dimension

特征参数	参数类型	孔隙度	渗透率	汞饱和度法分形维数	含水饱和度法分形维数
孔喉大小	R_d	y=3.99lnx+7.95, R²=0.38	y=1.47x^1.135, R²=0.62	y=3 897e^-4.41x, R²=0.76	y=4 066e^-3.088x, R²=0.16
	R_ave	y=3.83lnx+16.5, R²=0.47	y=14.86x^1.035, R²=0.69	y=5 836e^-5.51x, R²=0.88	y=269 6e^-3.759x, R²=0.19
	R₅₀	y=2.7lnx+17.22, R²=0.65	y=11.15x^{0.591 1}, R²=0.62	y=4×10⁸e^-9.672x, R²=0.85	y=10⁹e^-9.051x, R²=0.33
	D_M	y=3.53lnx+16.92, R²=0.59	y=14.09x^{0.887 5}, R²=0.74	y=10⁶e^-9.672x, R²=0.93	y=10⁶e^-6.123x, R²=0.32
孔喉分布	S_p	y=3.66lnx+15.77, R²=0.47	y=12.25x^{0.990 1}, R²=0.69	y=82 935e^-5.617x, R²=0.84	y=9 653e^-4.206x, R²=0.20
	D_R	y=-10.94lnx+12.4, R²=0.41	y=3.39x^-2.042, R²=0.29	y=0.071 6e^1.269x, R²=0.74	y=0.008 6e^1.923x, R²=0.43
	α	y=7.59lnx+12.4, R²=0.41	y=80.89x^{1.572 6}, R²=0.45	y=29.526e^-2.482x, R²=0.72	y=275.3e^-3.039x, R²=0.40
	S_k	y=-7.03lnx+14.01, R²=0.30	y=4.85x^-1.381, R²=0.23	y=4.229x-7.628, R²=0.58	y=5.946x-13.45, R²=0.40
孔喉连通	P_d	y=-3.99lnx+6.8, R²=0.38	y=4.45x^-1.058, R²=0.59	y=2×10^-5e^{4.409 5x}, R²=0.80	y=0.000 2e^3.088x, R²=0.16
	P₅₀	y=2.63lnx+16.3, R²=0.62	y=9.91x^-0.616, R²=0.63	y=2×10^-9e^{9.658 7x}, R²=0.85	y=3×10^-9e^{9.658 7x}, R²=0.28
	S_max	y=14.4lnx-54.43, R²=0.61	y=0.043x^{0.045 9}, R²=0.49	y=-83.08x+276.1, R²=0.64	y=-150x+479.7, R²=0.75
	W_e	y=-2.7lnx+17.7, R²=0.012	y=14.09x^-0.627, R²=0.013	y=-0.35x+37.6, R²=0.000 06	y=-4.64x+49.7, R²=0.005
注：R_d.最大孔喉半径；R_ave.平均孔喉半径；R₅₀.中值孔喉半径；D_M.半径均值；S_p.分选系数；D_R.相对分选系数；α.均质系数；S_k.歪度；P_d.排驱压力；P₅₀.中值压力；S_max.最大进汞饱和度；W_e.退汞效率

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 杭锦旗地区盒1段储层孔隙结构类型

Table 3. Pore structure types of the first Member of Lower Shihezi Formation reservoir in Hangjinqi area

孔隙结构类型	样品数	分形维数	孔隙度/%	渗透率/10^-3 μm²	排驱压力/MPa	平均孔喉半径/μm	最大进汞饱和度/%
Ⅰ类	8	2.138 4~2.302 3	9.8~17.0	1.90~11.34	0.28~0.53	0.19~0.63	86.9~91.1
Ⅱ类	13	2.314 4~2.399 9	4.4~13.8	0.57~5.84	0.60~1.14	0.06~0.14	66.6~91.5
Ⅲ类	9	2.409 3~2.488 8	1.6~10.0	0.52~1.86	0.58~1.66	0.05~0.13	56.2~89.4
Ⅳ类	5	2.527 1~2.829 2	0.1~5.4	0.15~1.09	0.82~11.31	0.01~0.10	32.6~80.1

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	Holditch S A.Tight gas sands[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2006, 58(6):86-93. doi: 10.2118/103356-JPT
[2]	Dai J, Ni Y, Wu X.Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3):277-284. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60043-3
[3]	贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htm
[4]	邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(2):173-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htm
[5]	赵靖舟, 白玉彬, 曹青, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地准连续型低渗透-致密砂岩大油田成藏模式[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(6):811-827. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201206000.htm
[6]	高树生, 胡志明, 刘华勋, 等.不同岩性储层的微观孔隙特征[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(2):248-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201602012.htm
[7]	张铜耀, 郝鹏.渤中凹陷深层特低孔特低渗砂砾岩储层储集空间精细表征[J].地质科技通报, 2020, 39(4):117-124. http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10007.shtml
[8]	Lai J, Wang G, Cao J, et al.Investigation of pore structure and petrophysical property in tight sandstones[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 91:179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.12.024
[9]	何涛, 王芳, 汪伶俐.致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征:以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7储层为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4):23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2013.04.005
[10]	谢升洪, 李伟, 冷福, 等.致密砂岩可动流体赋存规律及制约因素研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆油田长6段储层为例[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(5):105-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201905011.htm
[11]	Sakhaee-Pour A, Bryant S L.Effect of pore structure on the producibility of tight-gas sandstones[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2014, 98(4):663-694. doi: 10.1306/08011312078
[12]	张飞飞.特低渗-致密砂岩孔喉结构特征、演化及其对物性的控制:以松辽盆地北部下白垩统为例[J].东北石油大学学报, 2018, 42(5):54-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2018.05.006
[13]	Lai J, Wang G.Fractal analysis of tight gas sandstones using high-pressure mercury intrusion techniques[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 24:185-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.027
[14]	Guo X, Huang Z, Zhao L, et al.Pore structure and multi-fractal analysis of tight sandstone using MIP, NMR and NMRC methods:A case study from the Kuqa depression, China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178:544-558. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.03.069
[15]	吴浩, 刘锐娥, 纪友亮, 等.致密气储层孔喉分形特征及其与渗流的关系:以鄂尔多斯盆地下石盒子组盒8段为例[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(1):151-162. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201701015.htm
[16]	程泽虎, 李文浩, 薛海涛, 等.基于高压压汞技术和分形理论的致密砂岩储层分级评价标准[J].东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(1):50-59, 8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY201901007.htm
[17]	杨海, 孙卫, 明红霞, 等.分形几何在致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构研究中的应用:以苏里格气田东南部上石盒子组盒8段为例[J].石油地质与工程, 2015, 29(6):103-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2015.06.028
[18]	冯小哲, 祝海华.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构及分形特征[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3):147-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201903015.htm
[19]	葛小波, 李吉君, 卢双舫, 等.基于分形理论的致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构表征:以冀中坳陷致密砂岩储层为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):106-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201705012.htm
[20]	邓浩阳, 司马立强, 吴玟, 等.致密砂岩储层孔隙结构分形研究与渗透率计算:以川西坳陷蓬莱镇组、沙溪庙组储层为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):76-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201806009.htm
[21]	杨华, 刘新社, 闫小雄.鄂尔多斯盆地晚古生代以来构造-沉积演化与致密砂岩气成藏[J].地学前缘, 2015, 22(3):174-183. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201503017.htm
[22]	李功强, 贾会冲, 潘和平, 等.内蒙古杭锦旗探区石炭-二叠系天然气成藏模式[J].现代地质, 2017, 31(3):587-594. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201703015.htm
[23]	Xu Q, Shi W, Xie X, et al.Inversion and propagation of the Late Paleozoic Porjianghaizi fault(North Ordos Basin, China):Controls on sedimentation and gas accumulations[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 91:706-722. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817218300473
[24]	李婕, 赵俊兴, 孔祥超, 等.鄂北杭锦旗地区下石盒子组沉积相演化及控制因素[J].山东科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 32(2):34-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDKY201302006.htm
[26]	Mandelbrot B B, Passoja D E, Paullay A J.Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals[J].Nature, 1984, 308:721. http://www.nature.com/articles/308721a0
[26]	Song Z, Liu G, Yang W, et al.Multi-fractal distribution analysis for pore structure characterization of tight sandston:A case study of the Upper Paleozoic tight formations in the Longdong District, Ordos Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 92:842-854.
[27]	Li P, Zheng M, Bi H, et al.Pore throat structure and fractal characteristics of tight oil sandstone:A case study in the Ordos Basin, China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 149:665-674. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410516310191
[28]	赖锦, 王贵文, 郑懿琼, 等.低渗透碎屑岩储层孔隙结构分形维数计算方法:以川中地区须家河组储层41块岩样为例[J].东北石油大学学报, 2013, 37(1):1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY201301003.htm
[29]	彭军, 韩浩东, 夏青松, 等.深埋藏致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构的分形表征及成因机理:以塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区柯坪塔格组为例[J].石油学报, 2018, 39(7):775-791. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201807005.htm
[30]	Zhao H, Ning Z, Zhao T, et al.Effects of mineralogy on petrophysical properties and permeability estimation of the Upper Triassic Yanchang tight oil sandstones in Ordos Basin, Northern China[J].Fuel, 2016, 186:328-338. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236116308365