Sedimentary characteristics and controlling factors of the Ba 66 fan in Bayindulan Sag
-
摘要: 为了确定巴音都兰凹陷巴66扇体的成因类型和特征，利用岩心、岩石薄片、测井和三维地震等资料对其沉积特征、控制因素、沉积模式等进行了系统性研究。研究表明，巴66扇体为间歇性洪流经短距离搬运后快速沉积而成的扇三角洲，扇体水动力以重力驱动为主导，平面延伸短，内部分异差，整体呈朵状，具有“小平原-大前缘”的相带特点。扇体主要特征为：岩石成分成熟度和结构成熟度均低，以杂乱块状砂砾岩为典型岩相；测井曲线具有高幅、齿化、多突变接触等形态特征；地震相包含乱岗状、前积状、席状等类型，并据此划分出平原，前缘(近、中、远端)，前三角洲或湖相等相带。综合分析认为斜坡带之所以发育扇三角洲主要受凹陷背景环境、古地貌控制：①隆起物源、盆窄(无宽缓斜坡)、湖阔等背景条件保证了物源供给以及短距离搬运的条件；②凹槽古地貌提供了砂体发育空间，坡折带改变了坡度，分割了可容纳空间并控制了相带分布，水下低凸起影响了扇体平面形态展布，最终构建了巴66扇体的沉积模式。Abstract: Based on the data of core, thin sections, logging and 3D seismic, the sedimentary characteristics, controlling factors and sedimentary model of Ba 66 fan are studied systematically to determine the types and characteristics of the fan.The study shows that Ba 66 fan is a fan delta rapidly deposited by torrent after short-distance transport, and the hydrodynamic force of the fan is mainly driven by gravity.The extension distance of the fan is short on the plane.The fan is lobate as a whole and has the facies feature of " large plain, small front".The main characteristics of the fan are as follows: the maturity of the rock is low, and the disorderly massive glutenite is the typical lithofacies; The fan has the logging characteristics of high amplitude, odonation and abrupt contact.The fan bodies can be divided into plain, front (including proximal, middle and distal), pre-delta or lacustrine facies according to the characteristics of seismic facies, such as random hills, front accumulations, and sheets.The analysis shows that the development of fan delta in the slope belt is mainly controlled by the background environment of the depression and paleogeomorphology: ①The background conditions such as source of uplift area, narrow lake basin (no gentle slope) and wide lake surface ensure the supply of source and short-distance transportation conditions for the formation of fan delta; ②Grooves provide space for sand body development. The slope break changes the slope, divides the accommodation space, and controls the distribution of facies, and the low bulge under the water affects the plane distribution of the fan.Finally, the deposition model of Ba 66 fan is constructed.
-
Key words:
- Bayindulan Sag /
- glutenite /
- fan delta /
- sedimentary characteristics /
- controlling factor
-
图 2 巴音都兰凹陷地层综合柱状图(据文献[18]修改)
Figure 2. Stratigraphic comprehensive histogram of Bayindulan Sag
图 4 巴音都兰凹陷巴66扇体阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组岩心特征
a.B1井, 1 645.9 m，阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组，含砾砂岩，见巨砾(最大直径约14 cm)；b.B1井, 1 644.19 m，阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组下部为块状砂砾岩，上部为泥质中-细砂岩，底部发育冲刷面；c.B3井, 1 679.68 m，阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组，下部为砂砾岩，上部为粉砂岩，呈正旋回，上下岩性之间过渡快；d.B3井, 1 626 m, 阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组含砂细砾岩，可见漂浮状中砾，微顺层发育；e.B2井, 1 743.8 m, 阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组壁心扫描侧面展开图，砂砾岩；f.B4井, 1 626 m, 阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组，块状砂砾岩，砾石略显杂色，为多期叠置；g.B4井, 1 628.11 m, 阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组，下部为黑灰色泥岩，上部为粉砂岩，可见顺层油浸；h.B5井, 1 983.86 m, 阿四段(K1ba4)Ⅱ砂组，上、下为泥质细砂岩，中部为块状砂砾岩，见冲刷面；i.B5井, 1 985.36 m, 自下而上分别为灰黑色泥岩-粉砂岩-泥岩、粉砂岩互层-砂砾岩-中砂岩
Figure 4. Features of core of sandgroupⅡ in the fourth Member of the Aershan Formation of the Ba 66 fan in Bayindulan Sag
图 5 巴66扇体阿四段Ⅱ砂组测井相特征(岩性同图 2)
Figure 5. Characteristics of log facies of sand group Ⅱ in the fourth Member of the Aershan Formation of the Ba 66 fan
图 6 顺、切物源方向地震剖面
Figure 6. Seismic section in the direction parallel to the source and perpendicular to the source
图 10 巴66扇体阿四段Ⅱ砂组沉积相图
Figure 10. Sedimentary facies map of sand groupⅡ in the fourth Member of the Aershan Formation of the Ba 66 fan
图 12 巴音都兰凹陷南洼槽西部斜坡带地震剖面图
Figure 12. Seismic section of the western slope zone in the southern groove of Bayindulan Sag
图 13 阿四段沉积前古地貌图
Figure 13. Paleogeomorphology before the deposition of in the fourth Member of the Aershan Formation
-
[1] Rogers J P. New reservoir model from an old oil field: Garfield conglomerate pool, Pawnee County, Kansas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(10): 1349-1365. doi: 10.1306/06140706082 [2] 于兴河, 瞿建华, 谭程鹏, 等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(6): 619-627. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201406002.htm [3] Colella A, Boer P L D, Nio S D. Sedimentology of a marine intermontane Pleistocene Gilbert-type fan-delta complex in the Crati Basin, Calabria, southern Italy[J]. Sedimentology, 2010, 34(4): 721-736. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1987.tb00798.x/abstract [4] Chen B B, Xu B, Li B, et al. Understanding the performance of hydraulically fractured wells in the laumontite-rich tight glutenite formation[J/OL]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106600. [5] 张元福, 王航, 朱孟高, 等. 东营凹陷利津洼陷沙四上亚段砂砾岩扇体沉积特征分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(5): 59-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201405008.htm [6] 任江丽, 杜玉洪, 郭发军, 等. 二连盆地乌里雅斯太凹陷H区阿尔善油层组储层特征及影响因素[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(1): 160-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201901017.htm [7] 张铜耀, 郝鹏. 渤中凹陷深层特低孔特低渗砂砾岩储层储集空间精细表征[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(4): 117-124. http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10007.shtml [8] 唐勇, 徐洋, 瞿建华, 等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲群特征及分布[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(6): 628-635. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201406003.htm [9] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区三叠系百口泉组扇控大面积岩性油藏勘探实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(6): 14-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201406002.htm [10] 张昌民, 朱锐, 尹太举, 等. 扇三角洲沉积学研究进展[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(3): 362-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201503025.htm [11] Tan C P, Yu X H, Liu B B, et al. Conglomerate categories in coarse-grained deltas and their controls on hydrocarbon reservoir distribution: A case study of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Depression, NW China[J]. Petroleum Geoscience, 2017, 5(9): 403-414. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/314489588_Conglomerate_categories_in_coarse-grained_deltas_and_their_controls_on_hydrocarbon_reservoir_distribution_a_case_study_of_the_Triassic_Baikouquan_Formation_Mahu_Depression_NW_China [12] Liu B B, Tan C P, Yu X H, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and controls of a retreating, coarse-grained fan-delta system in the Lower Triassic, Mahu Depression, northwestern China[J]. Geological Journal, 2019, 54(3): 1141-1159. doi: 10.1002/gj.3215 [13] 邹志文, 李辉, 徐洋, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下三叠统百口泉组扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(2): 20-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201502004.htm [14] 崔周旗, 吴健平, 李莉, 等. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷早白垩世构造岩相带特征及含油性[J]. 古地理学报, 2001, 3(1): 25-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200101002.htm [15] 李正文, 王元杰, 殷宏平, 等. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷油气勘探再获新发现[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2003, 8(2): 34-39, 44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200302006.htm [16] 肖伟, 刘震, 党虎强, 等. 巴音都兰凹陷油气运聚特征研究[J]. 新疆石油学院学报, 2004, 1(1): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSY200401001.htm [17] Lin C S, Kenneth E, Li S T, et al. Sequence architecture, depositional systems, and controls on development of Lacustrine Basin fills in part of the Erlian Basin, Northeast China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(11): 2017-2043. doi: 10.1306/8626d0db-173b-11d7-8645000102c1865d [18] 陈树光, 张以明, 崔永谦, 等. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷反转构造及成因机制[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(4): 559-569. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201704006.htm [19] 高阳, 于兴河, 曾大乾, 等. 准噶尔盆地红山嘴地区三叠系克上组两类粗粒三角洲的沉积记录差异及其成因[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(6): 973-988. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201806006.htm [20] 王卫国, 姜山. 松辽盆地南部测井相的建立与测井相分析[J]. 铀矿地质, 2006, 22(6): 356-360, 349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YKDZ200606005.htm [21] 郝杰, 周立发, 袁义东, 等. 断陷湖盆致密粗砂岩、砂砾岩储层空间类型与有利储层成因[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(4): 134-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201804018.htm [22] 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 漆家福, 等. 二连盆地早白垩世复式断陷构造类型及其石油地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(7): 1289-1298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201507010.htm [23] 刘震, 付东阳, 肖伟, 等. 二连盆地三种典型构造带岩性油藏形成模式分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2007, 29(1): 32-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200701006.htm [24] 林畅松, 潘元林, 肖建新, 等. "构造坡折带": 断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2000, 25(3): 260-266. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200003008.htm [25] 黄传炎, 王华, 高嘉瑞, 等. 北塘凹陷古近系构造演化及其对层序充填样式的控制[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 32(3): 7-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200803003.htm [26] 黄传炎, 王华, 肖敦清, 等. 板桥凹陷断裂陡坡带沙一段层序样式和沉积体系特征及其成藏模式研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2007, 25(3): 386-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB200703008.htm [27] Starek D, Sliva L, Vojtko R. Eustatic and tectonic control on late Eocene fan delta development (Orava Basin, Central Western Carpathians)[J]. Geological Quarterly, 2012, 92(1): 67-84. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/260144817_Eustatic_and_tectonic_control_on_late_Eocene_fan_delta_development_Orava_Basin_Central_Western_Carpathians [28] 曾智伟, 杨香华, 舒誉, 等. 恩平凹陷北部陡坡带文昌组砂砾岩体发育特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(6): 60-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201406009.htm [29] 赵帅, 解习农, 刘中戎, 等. 古地貌对断陷盆地沉积体系的控制作用: 以青藏高原伦坡拉盆地始新统牛堡组为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2): 53-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902007.htm [30] 柯友亮, 郝杰, 王华, 等. 基于叠后地震数据的南堡凹陷高南斜坡带三角洲扇体识别及演化特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2): 89-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902011.htm [31] 徐长贵. 渤海古近系坡折带成因类型及其对沉积体系的控制作用[J]. 中国海上油气, 2006, 18(6): 365-371. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD200606001.htm [32] 朱筱敏, 信荃麟. 湖泊扇三角洲的重要特性[J]. 石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 1994, 18(3): 6-11. [33] 李维锋, 高振中, 彭德堂, 等. 库车坳陷早三叠世三角洲相及伴生沉积[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1995, 16(3): 216-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT503.002.htm [34] 盛和宜. 粒度分析在扇三角洲分类中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 1993, 15(2): 185-191. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD199302008.htm [35] 刘招君, 孙平昌, 杜江峰, 等. 汤原断陷古近系扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2010, 40(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201001001.htm [36] 王海林, 田家祥. 不同类型三角洲特征探讨[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 1994, 18(4): 135-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY404.032.htm [37] Postma G. Depositional architecture and facies of river and fan deltas: A synthesis[C]//Anon. Coarse-Grained Deltas. [S. l. ]: Spec. Publs Int. Ass. Sediment, 1990: 13-27. [38] 吴胜和, 熊琦华, 龚姚进, 等. 陡坡型和缓坡型扇三角洲及其油气储层意义[J]. 石油学报, 1994, 15(增刊1): 52-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB4S1.006.htm [39] 吴冬, 朱筱敏, 刘常妮, 等. "源-汇"体系主导下的断陷湖盆陡坡带扇三角洲发育模式探讨: 以苏丹Muglad盆地Fula凹陷37为例[J]. 高校地质学报, 2015, 21(4): 653-663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201504010.htm [40] 陈景山, 唐青松, 代宗仰, 等. 特征不同的两种扇三角洲相识别与对比[J]. 西南石油大学学报, 2007, 29(4): 1-6, 185. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY200704005.htm [41] 鲜本忠, 安思奇, 施文华. 水下碎屑流沉积: 深水沉积研究热点与进展[J]. 地质论评, 2014, 60(1): 39-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201401005.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(15)
计量
- 文章访问数: 861
- PDF下载量: 885
- 被引次数: 0
