Optimization of the landslide identification method based on a dual attention mechanism

Wu Qi; Zhou Chuangbing; Huang Faming; Yao Chi

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0053

Volume 41 Issue 2

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology > 2022 > 41(2): 246-253

Wu Qi, Zhou Chuangbing, Huang Faming, Yao Chi. Optimization of the landslide identification method based on a dual attention mechanism[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(2): 246-253. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0053

Citation:

Wu Qi, Zhou Chuangbing, Huang Faming, Yao Chi. Optimization of the landslide identification method based on a dual attention mechanism[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(2): 246-253. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0053

Citation:

PDF( 1887 KB)

Optimization of the landslide identification method based on a dual attention mechanism

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0053

Received Date: 11 Nov 2021

Abstract

Abstract

With the development of computer vision technology, studies on landslide identification have gradually been carried out by means of deep learning. By introducing the dual attention model, an optimization algorithm for landslide image recognition based on a convolutional neural network is proposed in this paper. Based on 2 200 landslide image datasets, this paper discusses the effects of 10 network structures and 4 attention models on landslide recognition results. The effectiveness of this method is verified by using a 4∶1 training set and test set for landslide recognition. The results show that the ResNet structure performs better than other network structures. For this example, the ResNet-101 structure has the highest recall rate, precision rate and F1-measure. Compared with a single neural network, the convolutional neural network with a dual attention model has a higher accuracy of landslide identification, and the segmentation result of the landslide boundary is closer to the real landslide boundary. Among them, the ResNet-101+DAN model is the optimal model. In contrast, a single neural network cannot overcome the influence of the image noise, and the result of the image segmentation is poor.
- landslide identification,
- convolutional neural network,
- automatic identification,
- attention module,
- landslide data set,
- optimization of method

FullText(HTML)

References(32)

References

[1]	黄润秋. 20世纪以来中国的大型滑坡及其发生机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(3): 433-454. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.03.001 Huang R C. Large scale landslides and their occurrence mechanism in China since the 20th century[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(3): 433-454(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.03.001
[2]	陈红旗. 贵州纳雍张家湾普洒村山体崩塌[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2018, 29(1): 22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH201801025.htm Cheng H Q. Mountain collapse in Pusa Village, Zhangjiawan, Nayong, Guizhou[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2018, 29(1): 22(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH201801025.htm
[3]	陈红旗. 四川茂县"6·24"特大山体滑坡灾害[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2017, 28(3): 51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH201703026.htm Cheng H Q. "6.24" landslide disaster in Maoxian County, Sichuan Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2017, 28(3): 51(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH201703026.htm
[4]	张卫雄, 翟向华, 丁保艳, 等. 甘肃舟曲江顶崖滑坡成因分析与综合治理措施[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(5): 7-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH202005002.htm Zhang W X, Zhai X H, Ding B Y, et al. Causative analysis and comprehensive treatment of the Jiangdingya landslide in Zhouqu County of Gansu Province[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2020, 31(5): 7-14(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH202005002.htm
[5]	Bellotti F, Bianchi M, Colombo D, et al. Advanced InSAR techniques to support landslide monitoring[C]//Anon. 15th Annual Conference of the International Association of Mathematical Geosciences. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2013: 287-290.
[6]	Escanoglu M, Gokceoglu C. Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area(north of Yenice, NW Turkey)by fuzzy approach[J]. Environmental Geology, 2002, 41(6): 720-730. doi: 10.1007/s00254-001-0454-2
[7]	胡涛, 樊鑫, 王硕, 等. 基于逻辑回归模型和3S技术的思南县滑坡易发性评价[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(2): 113-121. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202002013.htm Hu T, Fan X, Wang S, et al. Landslide susceptibility evaluation of Sinan County using logistics regression model and 3S technology[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(2): 113-121(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202002013.htm
[8]	Kayastha P, Dhital M R, Smedt F D. Application of the analytical hierarchy process(AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2013, 52(3): 398-408.
[9]	Althuwaynee O F, Pradhan B, Lee S. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2012, 44: 120-135. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009830041200091X
[10]	Komac M. A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia-Science Direct[J]. Geomorphology, 2006, 74(1): 17-28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X05002072
[11]	Lee S. Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Environmental Geology, 2007, 52(4): 615-623. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0491-y
[12]	Marjanovi M, Kovaevi M, Bajat B, et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm[J]. Engineering Geology, 2011, 123(3): 225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.006
[13]	黄发明, 胡松雁, 闫学涯, 等. 基于机器学习的滑坡易发性预测建模及其主控因子识别[J/OL]. 地质科技通报: 1-12[2021-09-30]. https://doi.org/10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0087. Huang F M, Hu S Y, Yan X Y, et al. Landslide susceptibility prediction and its main environmental factors identification based on machine learning models[J/OL]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology: 1-12[2021-09-30]. https://doi.org/10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0087(in Chinese with English abstract).
[14]	郑迎凯, 陈建国, 王成彬, 等. 确定性系数与随机森林模型在云南芒市滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(6): 131-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202006015.htm Zheng Y K, Chen J G, Wang C B, et al. Application of certainty factor and random forest model in landslide susceptibility evaluation in Mangshi City, Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6): 131-144(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202006015.htm
[15]	Hong Y, Yi M, Wang L, et al. A landslide intelligent detection method based on CNN and RSG_R[C]//Anon. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics & Automation. [S.l.]: IEEE, 2017: 40-44.
[16]	Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning[J]. Nature, 2015, 521: 436-444. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14539
[17]	He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep Residual learning for image recognition[C]//Anon. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2016: 770-778.
[18]	Ren S Q, He K M, Girshick R, et al. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6): 1137-1149. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031
[19]	Chen L C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, et al. DeepLab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018, 40(4): 834-848. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00915
[20]	Ding A, Zhang Q, Zhou X, et al. Automatic recognition of landslide based on CNN and texture change detection[C]//Anon. 201631st Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation(YAC). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2016: 444-448.
[21]	Ghorbanzadeh O, Blaschke T, Gholamnia K, et al. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(2): 196-216. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330514716_Evaluation_of_Different_Machine_Learning_Methods_and_Deep-Learning_Convolutional_Neural_Networks_for_Landslide_Detection
[22]	Jie H, Li S, Gang S, et al. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 42(8): 2011-2023. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8701503/
[23]	Park J, Woo S, Lee J Y, et al. BAM: Bottleneck attention module[C]//Anon. British machine vison conference. Berlin: BMWC, 2018: 147-160.
[24]	Woo S, Park J, Lee J Y, et al. Cbam: Convolutional block attention module[C]//Anon. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision(ECCV). [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2018: 3-19.
[25]	Fu J, Liu J, Tian H, et al. Dual attention network for scene segmentation[C]//Anon. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2020: 3141-3149.
[26]	Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1409.1556, 2014.
[27]	Evan S, Jonathan L, Trevor D. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(4): 640-651. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27244717/
[28]	王赛. 基于多源遥感数据的汶川地震型滑坡信息提取研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015. Wang S. Research on earthquake-induced landslide extraction from multi-source remote sensing data in the Wenchuan[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2015(in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, et al. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision[C]//Anon. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2016: 2818-2826.
[30]	Zhao H, Shi J, Qi X, et al. Pyramid scene parsing network[C]//Anon. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recongnition(CVPR). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2017: 6230-6239.
[31]	He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//Anon. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2016: 770-778.
[32]	Huang G, Liu Z, Laurens V, et al. Densely connected convolutional networks[C]//Anon. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR). [S.l.]: IEEE, 2017: 2261-2269.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article Views(775) PDF Downloads(98)

Optimization of the landslide identification method based on a dual attention mechanism

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0053

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Optimization of the landslide identification method based on a dual attention mechanism

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0053

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content