Volume 39 Issue 6
Nov.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang Yuan, Wang Shaoyong, Li Hao, Sun Yanda, He Haiquan, Wang Qinglong. Tight gas resource potential and prospect of the Lower Carboniferous in Marsel block, Kazakhastan[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6): 19-29. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0613
Citation: Wang Yuan, Wang Shaoyong, Li Hao, Sun Yanda, He Haiquan, Wang Qinglong. Tight gas resource potential and prospect of the Lower Carboniferous in Marsel block, Kazakhastan[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6): 19-29. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0613

Tight gas resource potential and prospect of the Lower Carboniferous in Marsel block, Kazakhastan

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0613
  • Received Date: 28 Mar 2020
  • The amount of discovered resource is not in consistence with resource evaluation results at all, which leads to little significant breakthrough in tight gas exploration of the Lower Carboniferous in Marsel block of Kazakhastan.Based on the analysis of high frequency sequences, well logging, oil testing and seismic data, the hydrocarbon source rock distribution, reservoir rock types and its physical properties, gas saturation of the Lower Carboniferous in Marsel block are reanalyzed.Both Monte Carlo Simulation Method and the finite method are applied, in order to reevaluate the tight gas resource potential and distribution in Marsel block.The results show that the distribution areas of effective source rocks of Serpukhovian and Visean can reach 1×104 km2.The TOC of source rocks is above 1.2% in the north and between 0.2%—1.2% in the south in Marsel block, all in the hydrocarbon generating peak stage.The reservoirs are reefal-shoal facies primarily interlayered with source rocks in a large area, with an average porosity of 6%, permeability below 10×10-3 μm2, and saturation between 45%—65%.With Monte Carlo Simulation Method, the recoverable resources are evaluated to be 155.1, 400.1 and 875.3 billion cubic meters under the probability of 90%, 50% and 10% respectively.Based on the finite method, the tight gas accumulation area is 6 000 km2, recoverable resource is 434.6 billion cubic meters, and the average abundance of recoverable resource is 0.07×108 m3/km2 belonging to the low-very low abundance tight gas resource.However, in "sweet spots" like northern ASSA, Terekhov, KNDK, it can be between 0.08×108 — 0.25×108 m3/km2.By referring to horizontal well SRV fracturing experiences and "sweet spot" optimization to enhance single well production, economic benefit of exploration and development can be realized in the Lower Carboniferous in Marsel block.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Effimoff I.Future hydrocarbon potential of Kazakhstan[J].AAPG Memoir, 2001, 74(12):243-258.
    [2]
    庞雄奇, 黄捍东, 林畅松, 等.哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区叠复连续气田形成、分布与探测及资源储量评价[J].石油学报, 2014, 35(6):1012-1056. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYXB201406003.htm
    [3]
    IHS Energy Group.International petroleum exploration and production database includes data current as of August[M]//Database available from HIS Energy Group.: HIS Energy Group, 2012.
    [4]
    Schmoker J W.Resource-assessment perspectives for unconventional gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1993-1999. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/299063416_Resource-assessment_perspectives_for_unconventional_gas_systems
    [5]
    Crovelli R A, Charpentier R R.Analytic resource assessment method for continuous (unconventional) oil and gas accumulations:The "ACCESS" method[M].Denver, Colorado:Denver Federal Center, 2000.
    [6]
    Haskett W J, Brown P J.Evaluation of unconventional resource plays[C]//Society of Petroleum Engineers.SPE annual technical conference and exhibition.Texas, USA: Society of Petroluem Engineers, 2005.
    [7]
    Olea R A, Cook T A, Coleman J L.A methodology for the assessment of unconventional of continuous resources with an application to the greater natural Buttes gas field, Utah[J].Natural Resources Research, 2010, 19(4):10-18. doi: 10.1007/s11053-010-9127-8
    [8]
    周庆凡, 张亚雄.油气资源量含义和评价思路的探讨[J].石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(3):474-480. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYYT201103024.htm
    [9]
    王社教, 蔚远江, 郭秋麟, 等.致密油资源评价新进展[J].石油学报, 2014, 35(6):1095-1105. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95667X/201406/663545898.html
    [10]
    郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 刘成林, 等.油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(10):1305-1314. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95667X/201510/83898866504849534948484952.html
    [11]
    Bykadorov V A, Bush V A, Fedorenko O A, et al.Ordovician-permian palaeogeography of central eurasia:Development of palaeozoic petroleum-bearing basins[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2003, 26(3):325-350. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-5457.2003.tb00033.x
    [12]
    Box S E, Syusyura B, Seltmann R, et al.Dzhezkazgan and associated sandstone copper deposits of the Chu-Sarysu Basin, central Kazakhstan[M].Kazakhstan:Society of Economic Geologists Economic Geology, 2012, 16:303-328.
    [13]
    Minskiy N A, Sokolova Y A.Secondary mineralization and oil potential of Lower Carboniferous rocks in Chu-Sarysu Basin in relation to tectonic activity[J].International Geology Review, 1974, 16(7):741-748. doi: 10.1080/00206817409471798
    [14]
    郑俊章, 周海燕, 黄先雄.哈萨克斯坦地区石油地质基本特征及勘探潜力分析[J].中国石油勘探, 2009, 14(2):80-86. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgsykt200902015
    [15]
    王屿涛, 杨新峰, 王晓钦, 等.哈萨克斯坦东南部含油气盆地石油地质条件及投资环境分析[J].中国石油勘探, 2010, 15(1):67-73. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference_7203874.aspx
    [16]
    刘景东, 蒋有录.构造反转对哈萨克斯坦A凹陷油气藏形成的影响力[J].地质科技情报, 2013, 32(3):75-80.
    [17]
    Abrajevitch A, van der Voo R, Bazhenov M L, et al.The role of the Kazakhstan orocline in the Late Paleozoic amalgamation of Eurasia[J].Tectonophysics, 2008, 455(1):61-76. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195108002175
    [18]
    Gürgey K.An attempt to recognise oil populations and potential source rock types in Paleozoic sub-and Mesozoic-Cenozoic supra-salt strata in the southern margin of the Pre-Caspian Basin, Kazakhstan Republic[J].Organic Geochemistry, 2002, 33(7):723-741. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00039-6
    [19]
    Zhang Manli, Lin Changsong, Sun Yanda, et al.Sequence framework, depositional evolution and controlling processes, the Early Carboniferous carbonate system, Chu-Sarysu Basin, southern Kazakhstan[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 111:544-556. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.08.046
    [20]
    石巨业, 金之钧, 樊太亮, 等.南图尔盖盆地Anyskum坳陷北部层序发育特征及充填演化模式[J].地质科技情报, 2016, 25(6):70-76, 89. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93477A/201606/670696248.html
    [21]
    徐桂芬, 林畅松, 李振涛.南哈萨克区块下石炭统层序岩相古地理及其对有利储集层的控制[J].东北石油大学学报, 2014, 38(6):1-11. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DQSY201406002.htm
    [22]
    王媛, 林畅松, 李浩, 等.哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区下石炭统高频层序地层特征与沉积演化[J].古地理学报, 2017, 19(5):820-834. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/84020X/201705/673383320.html
    [23]
    刘洛夫, 朱毅秀, 胡爱梅, 等.滨里海盆地盐下层系的油气地质特征[J].西南石油学院学报, 2002, 24(3):11-15. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=6433288
    [24]
    金之钧, 王骏, 张生根, 等.滨里海盆地盐卜油气成藏主控因素及勘探方向[J].石油实验地质, 2007, 29(2):111-115. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYSD200702001.htm
    [25]
    Gürgey K.An attempt to recognise oil populations and potential source rock types in Paleozoic sub-and Mesozoic-Cenozoic supra-salt strata in the southern margin of the Pre-Caspian Basin, Kazakhstan Republic[J].Organic Geochemistry, 2002, 33(7):723-741. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00039-6
    [26]
    Li Qianwen, Pang Xiongqi, Li Boyuan, et al.Discrimination of effective source rocks and evaluation of the hydrocarbon resource potential in Marsel, Kazakhstan[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 160:194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.029
    [27]
    Zhao Zhengfu, Pang Xiongqi, Li Qianwen, et al.Depositional environment and geochemical characteristics of the Lower Carboniferous source rocks in the Marsel area, Chu-Sarysu Basin, Southern Kazakhstan[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 81:134-148. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.12.021
    [28]
    Webb G E.Latest Devonian and Early Carboniferous reefs:Depressed reef building after the Middle Paleozoic collapse[J].SEPM Special Publication, 2002, 72:239-269.
    [29]
    王媛, 林畅松, 李浩, 等.哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区下石炭统碳酸盐岩微相特征与沉积环境[J].现代地质, 2018, 32(3):511-526. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96868X/20183/675855242.html
    [30]
    何聪鸽, 范子菲, 许安著.稠油油藏水平井过热蒸汽吞叶储层适应性评价[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(1):247-251.
    [31]
    王媛, 林畅松, 李浩, 等.高频层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究:以哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区下石炭统谢尔普霍夫阶为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1):28-41. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/trqdqkx201801003
    [32]
    Sibley D F, Gregg J M.Classification of dolomite rock texture[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1987, 57(6):967-975.
    [33]
    Zhang Kun, Pang Xiongqi, Zhao Zhengfu, et al.Pore structure and fractal analysis of Lower Carboniferous carbonate reservoirs in the Marsel area, Chu-Sarysu Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 93:451-467. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.027
    [34]
    Cook H E, Zhemchuzhnikov V G, Zempolich W G.Devonian and Carboniferous carbonate platform facies in the Bolshoi Karatau, Southern Kazakhstan:Outcrop analogs for coeval carbonate oil and gas fields in the North Caspian Basin, Western Kazakhstan[J].Transplantation, 2002, 56(3):512-517.
    [35]
    陈晓智, 庞雄奇, 邵新荷, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地临兴A地区下石盒子组致密砂岩气成藏条件[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(1):169-176.
    [36]
    王鹏飞, 高振南, 李俊飞, 等.基于数理统计方法的地质模型不确定性评价[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2):291-296.
    [37]
    赵鹏飞, 王庆如, 王龙, 等.SPE规则在储量和潜在资源量评估中的应用探讨[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(1):231-239.
    [38]
    王鹏飞, 高振南, 李俊飞, 等.基于数理统计方法的地质模型不确定性评价[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2):291-296.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(652) PDF Downloads(3428) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return