Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang Sub-Sag, Nanpu Depression

Zeng Bang; Liu Xiaoping; Liu Guoyong; Wang Shaochun; Li Guoyong

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0103

Volume 40 Issue 1

Jan. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology > 2021 > 40(1): 69-79

Zeng Bang, Liu Xiaoping, Liu Guoyong, Wang Shaochun, Li Guoyong. Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang Sub-Sag, Nanpu Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 69-79. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0103

Citation:

Zeng Bang, Liu Xiaoping, Liu Guoyong, Wang Shaochun, Li Guoyong. Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang Sub-Sag, Nanpu Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 69-79. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0103

Citation:

Zeng Bang, Liu Xiaoping, Liu Guoyong, Wang Shaochun, Li Guoyong. Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang Sub-Sag, Nanpu Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 69-79. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0103

PDF( 3257 KB)

Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang Sub-Sag, Nanpu Depression

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0103

Zeng Bang^{1a, 1b
,},
Liu Xiaoping^{1a, 1b
,
,},
Liu Guoyong²,
Wang Shaochun²,
Li Guoyong²

Received Date: 16 Sep 2019

Abstract

Abstract

The study of the lithofacies of shale formation is the basic work for shale oil exploration.Due to the limited distribution of the continental lacustrine basin and the fast variations of lithofacies, it is difficult to accurately identify and predict the lithofacies.With high precision and good continuity in vertical direction, the logging curve can be used to accurately identify and predict the lithofacies.Based on the experimental data of whole-rock X-ray diffraction(XRD), thin-section identification and geochemical analysis data, the lithofacies can be divided according to the division scheme named three classes & ternary plots.Fitting logging data with TOC value and mineral content, the lithofacies can be comprehensively identified.Finally, the cycle superposition model of lithofacies is established under the high-resolution sequence frame to study the distribution of lithofacies.The results show that the area is a set of oil-bearing lacustrine source rocks with Ⅰ and Ⅱ₁ kerogen, which can be divided into 18 types of lithofacies, among which organic-rich argillaceous lamellar shale and organic-rich mixed lamellar shale are the dominant lithofacies.The evaluation indexes of the lithofacies can be calculated and predicted through the logging curve.There is a coupling relationship between the lithofacies and the sequence so that the lithofacies are predictable under the isochronous stratigraphic framework.The lithofacies of shale formation of the Es₃⁴ sub-member are under this framework, forming two organic-rich layers located in the middle of MSC1 and MSC2 middle cycles and four sedimentary tectonic development zones corresponding to the SQ5-SQ8 ascending semi-cycling.
- Nanpu Depression,
- shale system,
- lithofacies,
- logging,
- isochrono stratigraphic frame

FullText(HTML)

References(30)

References

[1]	贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202002.htm
[2]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等, 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201006003.htm
[3]	Zhu H, Kong X, Long H, et al.Duvernay shale lithofacies distribution analysis in the West Canadian Sedimentary Basin[J].IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 121(5):1-8. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/121/5/052007
[4]	Bowker K A.Recent development of the Barnett shale play, Fort Worth Basin[J].West Texas Geological Society Bulletin, 2003, 42(6):1-11. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/285699986_Recent_development_of_the_Barnett_Shale_play_Fort_Worth_Basin
[5]	Hichey J J, Henk B.Lithofacies summary of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Mitchell 2 TP Sims well, Wise County Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 91(4):437-443. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/249897891_Lithofacies_summary_of_the_Mississippian_Barnett_Shale_Mitchell_2_TP_Sims_well_Wise_County_Texas
[6]	Zhao Xianzheng, Zhou Lihong, Pu Xiugang, et al.Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration in a lacustrine basin:A case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3):361-372. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_petroleum-exploration-development_thesis/0201248774953.html
[7]	Ou Chenghua, Li Chaochu, Rui Zhenhua, et al.Lithofacies distribution and gas-controlling characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi black shales in the southeastern region of the Sichuan Basin, China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 165:269-283. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.02.024
[8]	Wang G C, Catt T R.Organic-rich marcellus shale lithofacies modeling and distribution pattern analysis in the Appalachian Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(12):2173-2205. doi: 10.1306/05141312135
[9]	Daniel M J, Ronald J H, Tim E R, et al.Unconventional shale-gas system:The Mississippian barnett shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499. doi: 10.1306/12190606068
[10]	Loucks R G, Ruppel S C.Mississippian Barnett Shale:Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):579-601. doi: 10.1306/11020606059
[11]	Qiu Zhen, Tao Huifei, Zou Cainen, et al.Lithofacies and organic geochemistry of the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusar Sag of the Junggar Basin, NW China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 140:97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.014
[12]	王宏语, 杨润泽, 张峰, 等.富含有机质泥页岩岩相表征的研究现状与趋势[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(2):141-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201802020.htm
[13]	孟令箭, 吴建楠, 汤建荣, 等.南堡凹陷地层压力演化及成因[J].地质科技情报, 2016, 35(5):110-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201605015.htm
[14]	曹宇.南堡凹陷断裂系统类型及其控藏作用[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(4):22-27. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2016.04.004
[15]	万里明, 吴均, 卢军凯, 等.基于Adam-神经网络的致密砂岩脆性评价方法:以南堡凹陷高北边坡为例[J].地质科技通报, 2020, 39(2):94-103. http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9978.shtml
[16]	Mohamed O, Abouelresh, Roger M S.Lithofacies and sequence stratigraphy of the Barnet Shale in east-central Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(1):34-43. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264332984_lithofacies_and_sequence_stratigraphy_of_the_barnett_shale_in_east-central_fort_worth_basin_texas
[17]	董春梅, 马存飞, 林承焰, 等.一种泥页岩层系岩相划分方法[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 39(3):1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2015.03.001
[18]	Wang Pengfei, Jiang Zhenxue, Yin Lishi, et al.Lithofacies classification and its effect on pore structure of the Cambrian marine shale in the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China:Evidence from FE-SEM and gas adsorption analysis[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 156:307-321. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.011
[19]	Wang Chao, ZhangBaiqiao, Lu Yingchao, et al.Lithofacies distribution characteristics and its controlling factors ofshale in Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in the Jiaoshiba area[J].Petroleum Research, 2018, 3:306-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2018.11.005
[20]	Lazar O R, Bohacs K M, Macquaker J H, et al.Capturing key attributes of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in outcrops, cores, and thin sections:Nomenclature and description guidelines[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2015, 85(3):230-246. doi: 10.2110/jsr.2015.11
[21]	柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等.陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件:以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):84-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201805009.htm
[22]	赵显令, 王贵文, 周正龙, 等.地球物理测井岩性解释方法综述[J].地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(3):1278-1287. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201503038.htm
[23]	Huang Chuanyan, Zhang Jinchuan, Wang Hua, et al.Lower Es₃ in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression:A case study for lithofacies classification in lacustrine mud shale.[J].Applied Geophysics, 2018, 15(2):151-164. doi: 10.1007/s11770-018-0678-5
[24]	马淼, 孙卫, 白云云, 等.姬塬地区长6储层成岩相特征及测井响应[J].地质科技情报, 2018, 37(3):177-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201803023.htm
[25]	时志强, 曾德勇, 熊兆军, 等.三叠纪巨型季风在上扬子地区的沉积学记录[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2010, 29(2):164-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2010.02.008
[26]	宋明水.东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段沉积环境的地球化学特征[J].矿物岩石, 2005, 25(1):67-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200501013.htm
[27]	许璟, 蒲仁海, 杨林, 等.塔里木盆地石炭系泥岩沉积时的古盐度分析[J].沉积学报, 2010, 28(3):509-517. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201003014.htm
[28]	张廷山, 彭志, 祝海华, 等.海安凹陷曲塘次凹阜二段页岩油形成条件及勘探潜力[J].地质科技情报, 2016, 35(2):177-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201602035.htm
[29]	王贵文, 徐敬领, 杨宁, 等.小波分频分析法在沉积层序划分及等时对比中的应用[J].高校地质学报, 2013, 19(1):70-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2013.01.011
[30]	李峰峰, 郭睿, 余义常.层序地层划分方法进展及展望[J].地质科技情报, 2019, 38(4):215-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201904022.htm

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Yuejiao，LAI Fuqiang，XU Hao，et al. Intelligent identification methods for shale lithology based on the coupling deeply of logging curves[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology，2025，44（1）：308-320. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230361.
[2]	Sedimentary structure characteristics and logging identification method for the first member of Qingshankou Formation shale strata in Gulong sag[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240641
[3]	Li Hongbin, Wang Guiwen, Pang Xiaojiao, Liu Xiaoping, Wang Gaocheng, Shu Honglin, Luo Yufeng, Liu Mengcai, Lai Jin. Logging evaluation of the engineering quality of the Paleogene Funing Formation oil shales in the Subei Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(3): 311-322. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210692
[4]	Liu Hongkun, Ai Yong, Wang Guiwen, Chen Kangjun, Cai Deyang, Cao Juntao, Xie Yuqiang, Li Dong, Lai Jin. Quantitative well logging evaluation of diagenetic facies of deep and ultra deep tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of Bozi-Dabei area in Kuqa Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(1): 299-310. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0256
[5]	Qu Lili, Duan Jian, Yu Chenglin, Lin Weiqiang, Qiu Yuwei. Fine description method of the underwater distributary channel in a braided river delta front: A case study of the first Member of the Dongying Formation in the M Oilfield, Nanpu Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(3): 134-141. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20220645
[6]	Jing Yuqian, Lei Chuang, Liu Kedong, Li Zhenhua. Deposition environment and provenance of the Palaeogene Shahejie Formation in Nanpu Sag: Evidences from trace and rare earth element geochemistry[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(1): 350-359. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0131
[7]	Rao Shiyi, Fu Meiyan, Deng Hucheng, Wu Dong, Xu Wang, Chen Pei, Guo Hengwei. A new method for restoration of sedimentary paleogeomorphology based on lithofacies and geochemistry: A case study of the Qixia Formation in central Sichuan[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(5): 205-213. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20210730
[8]	Shi Biao, Wu Feng, Li Shuxin, Liang Yun, Xi Yanping, Dai Jin, Shi Xiangchao, Zhao Hui. Logging identification of high-quality shale of the marine-continent transitional facies: An example of the Shan 2 Member of the Daning-Jixian area in the Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2): 115-126. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0107
[9]	Wu Feng, Luo Yingying, Li Yuhan, Yang Zongheng, Zhang Hongqian, Liu Jianfeng, Shi Xiangchao. Fracture characteristics and logging identification of lacustrine limestone-shale reservoirs in Da′anzhai Member, Gongshanmiao Oilfield, Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 55-67. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0230
[10]	Cao Qingchao, Bai Zhuangzhuang, Li Haowu, Zhang Ningning. Application of wavelet transformation of logging data in sequence stratigraphic division of Cambrian Xixiangchi Group in Central Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(4): 242-251. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0418
[11]	Shi Yuanrun, Lin Xiao, Xu Yadong, Yu Shuchao, Sun Qingquan. Quaternary stratigraphic regionalization and comprehensive framework in Nanling and adjacent areas[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(3): 151-162. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0309
[12]	Gou Qiyang, Xu Shang, Hao Fang, Lu Yangbo, Shu Zhiguo, Wang Yuxuan. Research on mud shale fractures based on image logging: A case study of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6): 193-200. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0620
[13]	Wan Liming, Wu Jun, Lu Junkai, Liu Yi, Chen Mian. Brittleness evaluation method of tight sandstone based on Adam-neural network: A case study of a block in Gaobei slope, Nanpu Sag[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(2): 94-103. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0210
[14]	Liu Kexing, Gan Huajun, Zhao Zhongxin, Li Xiaopeng, Ma Jianghao, Ke Youliang, Wang Siyang, Gong Tianhao, Zhang Yikang. Evolution of Sedimentary System of Continental Faulted Lacustrine Basin under High-Precision Sequence Framework:A Case from the Third Member of Dongying Formation in Laoyemiao Area, Nanpu Sag[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2019, 38(3): 88-102.
[15]	Wang Hongyu, Yang Runze, . Research Progress and Trend of Organic-Rich Shale Lithofacies Characterization[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2018, 37(2): 141-148.
[16]	Bai Yunyun, Liu Dengke, . Characteristics of Diagenetic Facies of Chang 6 Reservoir and Logging Response in Jiyuan Area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2018, 37(3): 177-184.
[17]	Tang Peng, Cai Zhongxian, Qi Lixin, Yun Lu, Zhang Heng, Jing Kangkang, He Junyi. Division of Sequence Stratigraphic Framework in Lianglitage Formation in Shunxi Area, Northwestern Tazhong[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2017, 36(5): 31-39.
[18]	Evolution and Formation Mechanism of Pressure in the Nanpu Sag[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2016, 35(5): 110.
[19]	Wu Jing, Jiang Zaixing, Wu Minghao. Summary of Research Methods About the Sequence Stratigraphy of the Fine-Grained Rocks[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2015, 34(5): 16-20.
[20]	Analysis and Forecast of Coal-Bearing Strata Distribution in Yangtze Depression in Western Depression Belt,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2012, 31(3): 77.

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(13)

1.	黄玉越，王贵文，匡立春，覃英伦，王松，党文乐，卓色强，毕少琛，赖锦. 桂中坳陷下石炭统鹿寨组一段页岩类型划分与测井识别. 古地理学报. 2025(01): 256-270 .
2.	唐磊，廖文婷，夏连军，马捷，张娟. 页岩纹层类型与测井表征方法研究——以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段为例. 油气藏评价与开发. 2025(01): 28-39 .
3.	刘粤蛟，赖富强，徐浩，王濡岳，张晓树，罗彤彤，杨彬跃. 基于测井曲线深程度耦合的页岩岩相智能识别方法. 地质科技通报. 2025(01): 308-320 . 本站查看
4.	管倩倩，蒋龙，程紫燕，张典栋，王云鹤，张帆. 东营凹陷页岩油岩相要素测井评价新方法及其应用. 油气藏评价与开发. 2024(03): 435-445+457 .
5.	Weilin Yan，Chunyan Wang，Shujun Yin，Zheng Wen，Jiandong Zheng，Xiuli Fu，Zhou Feng，Zhaoqian Zhang，Jianhua Zhu. A log-based method for fine-scale evaluation of lithofacies and its applications to the Gulong shale in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China. Energy Geoscience. 2024(03): 193-206 .
6.	静禹钱，雷闯，刘克栋，李振华. 南堡凹陷古近系沙河街组沉积环境和物源:来自微量和稀土元素地球化学的证据. 地质科技通报. 2023(01): 350-359 . 本站查看
7.	张驰，潘懋，胡水清，胡亚斐，阎逸群. 融合储层纵向信息的机器学习岩性识别方法. 地质科技通报. 2023(03): 289-299 . 本站查看
8.	林珊珊，单敬福，严嘉成，李希元，刘国文. 南堡凹陷北部始新世米兰科维奇记录及其对沉积响应的指示意义. 科学技术与工程. 2023(19): 8085-8094 .
9.	程丹华，焦霞蓉，王建伟，庄东志，王政军，江山. 黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷古近系沙一段页岩油储层特征及油气意义. 岩性油气藏. 2022(03): 70-81 .
10.	李阳，赵清民，吕琦，薛兆杰，曹小朋，刘祖鹏. 中国陆相页岩油开发评价技术与实践. 石油勘探与开发. 2022(05): 955-964 .
11.	LI Yang，ZHAO Qingmin，LYU Qi，XUE Zhaojie，CAO Xiaopeng，LIU Zupeng. Evaluation technology and practice of continental shale oil development in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2022(05): 1098-1109 .
12.	吴丰，罗莹莹，李昱翰，杨宗恒，张洪千，刘建锋，石祥超. 四川盆地公山庙油田大安寨段湖相灰岩-页岩裂缝特征与测井识别. 地质科技通报. 2022(05): 55-67 . 本站查看
13.	杜佳，刘彦成，白洁玢，张迎春，林利明，师素珍. 基于波形指示模拟的致密砂岩储层预测. 地质科技通报. 2022(05): 94-100 . 本站查看

Other cited types(5)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article Views(655) PDF Downloads(5068)