Volume 42 Issue 4
Jul.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhao Jingbo, Liu Jian, Zhou Zhichao, Ji Ruili, Zhang Ming, Fu Xinyu. Parallel groundwater flow simulation method based on a discrete fracture network model[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(4): 55-64. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230078
Citation: Zhao Jingbo, Liu Jian, Zhou Zhichao, Ji Ruili, Zhang Ming, Fu Xinyu. Parallel groundwater flow simulation method based on a discrete fracture network model[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(4): 55-64. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230078

Parallel groundwater flow simulation method based on a discrete fracture network model

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230078
  • Received Date: 15 Feb 2023
  • Accepted Date: 20 Apr 2023
  • Rev Recd Date: 20 Apr 2023
  • Objective

    Groundwater flow in fractured rocks has strong heterogeneity and anisotropy. The discrete fracture network (DFN) method has been internationally considered as one of the most reasonable and effective methods to describe the fracture water transport.

    Methods

    In this work, we focused on granite rock from an underground research laboratory site for the geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In addition, a high-performance numerical computing system and parallel codes were employed to develop a groundwater flow simulation method in fractured rocks based on the DFN model.

    Results

    The results indicated that the proposed method could conduct the groundwater flow simulation of DFN with thousands of mesh elements. This improved the computational efficiency and ability of the parallel codes to deal with complex models. We established the DFN model structure optimization and parameter setting methods of boundary conditions in a complex condition. This could ensure that the hydraulic heads were continuous at different scale models. Furthermore, in the model area, the hydraulic head is distributed as a network structure along fractures. For the connected fractures, the water level was continuous and changed from high to low. However, the water level in the nonconnected fractures was discontinuous. Groundwater flows along the fracture from the high water level area to the low water level area. The connectivity and permeability of the fracture network have an obvious influence on the groundwater flow characteristics.

    Conclusion

    Therefore, we could conclude that the parallel groundwater flow simulation method based on the DFN model could more reasonably reflect the groundwater flow in a fractured rock mass. It was of great significance to further improve the simulated prediction ability and deepen the understanding of groundwater flow characteristics in a fractured medium.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    郭永海, 王驹, 金远新. 世界高放废物地质处置库选址研究概况及国内进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2001, 8(2): 327-332. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200102020.htm

    Guo Y H, Wang J, Jin Y X. The general situation of geological disposal repository siting in the world and research progress in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2001, 8(2): 327-332(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200102020.htm
    [2]
    王驹, 张铁岭, 郑华铃. 世界放射性废物地质处置[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 1999.

    Wang J, Zhang T L, Zheng H L. Geological disposal of radioactive waste in the world[M]. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press, 1999(in Chinese).
    [3]
    Bense V F, Gleeson T, Loveless S E, et al. Fault zone hydrogeology[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2013, 127: 171-192. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.09.008
    [4]
    张人权, 梁杏, 靳孟贵, 等. 水文地质学基础: 第6版[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011.

    Zhang R Q, Liang X, Jin M G, et al. Foundation of hydrogeology: 6th Edition[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011(in Chinese).
    [5]
    Illman W A. Hydraulic tomography offers improved imaging of heterogeneity in fractured rocks[J]. Groundwater, 2014, 52(5): 659-684. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12119
    [6]
    Neuman S P. Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2005, 13(1): 124-147. doi: 10.1007/s10040-004-0397-2
    [7]
    Gómez-Hernández J J, Cassiraga E F. Theory and practice of sequential simulation[C]//Armstrong M, Dowd P A. Geostatistical simulations. Dordect: Springer, 1994, 7: 111-124.
    [8]
    Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J. Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: A user's guide[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
    [9]
    Park Y J, Sudicky E A, McLaren R G, et al. Analysis of hydraulic and tracer response tests within moderately fractured rock based on a transition probability geostatistical approach[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(12): W12404.
    [10]
    Blessent D, Therrien R, Lemieux J M. Inverse modeling of hydraulic tests in fractured crystalline rock based on a transition probability geostatistical approach[J]. Water Resources Research, 2011, 47(12): W12530.
    [11]
    Zha Y Y, Yeh T C J, Illman W A, et al. What does hydraulic tomography tell us about fractured geological media? A field study and synthetic experiments[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 531(S1): 17-30.
    [12]
    Zha Y, Yeh T C J, Illman W A, et al. Incorporating geologic information into hydraulic tomography: A general framework based on geostatistical approach[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017, 53(4): 2850-2876. doi: 10.1002/2016WR019185
    [13]
    Tiedeman C R, Barrash W. Hydraulic tomography: 3D hydraulic conductivity, fracture network, and connectivity in mudstone[J]. Groundwater, 2019, 58(2): 238-257.
    [14]
    Vesselinov V V, Neuman S P, Illman W A. Three-dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross-hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 2. Equivalent parameters, high-resolution stochastic imaging and scale effects[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(12): 3019-3041. doi: 10.1029/2000WR000135
    [15]
    Berkowitz B. Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2002, 25(8): 861-884.
    [16]
    Samardzioska T, Popov V. Numerical comparison of the equivalent continuum, non-homogeneous and dual porosity models for flow and transport in fractured porous media[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2005, 28(3): 235-255. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.11.002
    [17]
    Karimi-Fard M, Gong B, Durlofsky L J. Generation of coarse-scale continuum flow models from detailed fracture characterizations[J]. Water Resources Research, 2006, 42(10): W10423.
    [18]
    Cacas M C, Ledoux E, de Marsily G, et al. Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: Calibration and validation: 1. The flow model[J]. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(3): 479-489.
    [19]
    Nordqvist A W, Tsang Y, Tsang C, et al. A variable aperture fracture network model for flow and transport in fractured rocks[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(6): 1703-1713. doi: 10.1029/92WR00216
    [20]
    宋晓晨, 徐卫亚. 裂隙岩体渗流模拟的三维离散裂隙网络数值模型(Ⅰ): 裂隙网络的随机生成[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(12): 2015-2020. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200412014.htm

    Song X C, Xu W Y. Numerical model of three-dimensional discrete fracture network for seepage in fractured rocks(Ⅰ): Generation of fracture network[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(12): 2015-2020(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200412014.htm
    [21]
    宋晓晨, 徐卫亚. 裂隙岩体渗流模拟的三维离散裂隙网络数值模型(Ⅱ): 稳定渗流计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(12): 2021-2026. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.12.013

    Song X C, Xu W Y. Numerical model of three-dimensional discrete fracture network for seepage in fractured rocks(Ⅱ): Computation of steady flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(12): 2021-2026(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.12.013
    [22]
    de Dreuzy J R, Méheust Y, Pichot G. Influence of fracture scale heterogeneity on the flow properties of three-dimensional discrete fracture networks(DFN)[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2012, 117: B11207.
    [23]
    黄宇, 杨荣森, 韩晓东, 等. 基于定向半变异函数的裂隙网络空间变异性分析与研究[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2): 186-193. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0248

    Huang Y, Yang R S, Han X D, et al. Analysis and research on spatial variability of fracture network based on oriented semivariogram[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2): 186-193(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0248
    [24]
    Lang P, Paluszny A, Zimmerman R. Permeability tensor of three-dimensional fractured porous rock and a comparison to trace map predictions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2014, 119(8): 6288-6307. doi: 10.1002/2014JB011027
    [25]
    胡成, 陈刚, 曹孟雄, 等. 基于离散裂隙网络法和水流数值模拟技术的地下水封洞库水封性研究[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(1): 119-126. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0029

    Hu C, Chen G, Cao M X, et al. A case study on water sealing efficiency of groundwater storage caverns using discrete fracture network method and flow numerical simulation[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(1): 119-126(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2022.0029
    [26]
    Koudina N, Garcia R G, Thovert J F, et al. Permeability of three-dimensional fracture networks[J]. Physical Review E, 1998, 57(4): 4466-4479. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.4466
    [27]
    Bogdanov I, Mourzenko V, Thovert J F, et al. Effective permeability of fractured porous media in steady state flow[J]. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(1): 1023.
    [28]
    Erhel J, De Dreuzy J R, Poirriez B. Flow simulation in three-dimensional discrete fracture networks[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2009, 31(4): 2688-2705. doi: 10.1137/080729244
    [29]
    Hyman J D, Gable C W, Painter S L, et al. Conforming Delaunay triangulation of stochastically generated three dimensional discrete fracture networks: A feature rejection algorithm for meshing strategy[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2014, 36(4): A1871-A1894.
    [30]
    Ishibashi T, Watanabe N, Hirano N, et al. GeoFlow: A novel model simulator for prediction of the 3-D channeling flow in a rock fracture network[J]. Water resources research, 2012, 48: W07601.
    [31]
    Pichot G, Poirriez B, Erhel J, et al. A mortar BDD method for solving flow in stochastic discrete fracture networks[C]// Erhel J, Cander M J, Halpern L, et al. Domain decomposition methods in science and engineering XXI. Cham: Springer, 2014, 98: 99-112.
    [32]
    Hyman J D, Karra S, Makedonska N, et al. dfnWorks: A discrete fracture network framework for modeling subsurface flow and transport[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2015, 84: 10-19.
    [33]
    Koch T, Gläser D, Weishaupt K, et al. DuMu(x) 3: An open-source simulator for solving flow and transport problems in porous media with a focus on model coupling[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2021, 81(S1): 423-443.
    [34]
    Golder Associates Ltd. . FracMan 7.9 Workshop[R]. Buckinghamshire: Golder Associates(UK) Ltd, 2020.
    [35]
    Wood A F. ConnectFlow Verification Release 11.4[R]. Oxfordshire: Amec Foster Wheeler, 2016.
    [36]
    Hu Y, Xu W, Zhan L, et al. Modeling of solute transport in a fracture-matrix system with a three-dimensional discrete fracture network[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 605: 127333.
    [37]
    Hadgu T, Karra S, Kalinina E, et al. A comparative study of discrete fracture network and equivalent continuum models for simulating flow and transport in the far field of a hypothetical nuclear waste repository in crystalline host rock[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 553: 59-70.
    [38]
    Li X, Li D, Xu Y, et al. A dfn based 3-D numerical approach for modeling coupled groundwater flow and solute transport in fractured rock mass[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 149: 119179.
    [39]
    Ma G, Li T, Wang Y, et al. Numerical simulations of nuclide migration in highly fractured rock masses by the unified pipe-network method[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 111: 261-276.
    [40]
    罗辉, 王驹, 蒋实, 等. 高放废物地质处置新场岩体三维地质模型构建与应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(3): 568-575. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WTYH201903016.htm

    Luo H, Wang J, Jiang S, et al. Construction and application of three-dimensional geological model in Xinchang block for high-level radioactive waste disposal[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(3): 568-575(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WTYH201903016.htm
    [41]
    Hyman J, Aldrich G, Viswanathan H, et al. Fracture size and transmissivity correlations: Implications for transport simulations in sparse three-dimensional discrete fracture networks following a truncated power law distribution of fracture size[J]. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(8): 6472-6489.
    [42]
    刘健, 陈亮, 王春萍, 等. 地下实验室围岩力学及长期稳定性研究[R]. 北京: 核工业北京地质研究院, 2019.

    Liu J, Chen L, Wang C P, et al. Study on mechanical characteristics and long-term stability of surrounding rock of underground research laboratory[R]. Beijing: Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, 2019(in Chinese).
    [43]
    Follin S, Hartley L, Rhén I, et al. A methodology to constrain the parameters of a hydrogeological discrete fracture network model for sparsely fractured crystalline rock, exemplified by data from the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository site at Forsmark, Sweden[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2014, 22(2): 313-331.
    [44]
    Joyce S, Hartley L, Applegate D, et al. Multi-scale groundwater flow modeling during temperate climate conditions for the safety assessment of the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository site at Forsmark, Sweden[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2014, 22(6): 1233-1249.
    [45]
    赵敬波, 周志超, 季瑞利, 等. 区域地下水流动模拟与预测评价[R]. 北京: 核工业北京地质研究院, 2020.

    Zhao J B, Zhou Z C, Ji R L, et al. Numerical model and prediction of regional groundwater flow in Beishan area[R]. Beijing: Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, 2020(in Chinese).
    [46]
    Makedonska N, Painter S L, Bui Q M, et al. Particle tracking approach for transport in three-dimensional discrete fracture networks: Particle tracking in 3-D DFNs[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2015, 19(5): 1123-1137.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(615) PDF Downloads(85) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return