Volume 44 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Zeyu,OU Chenghua,XIAO Furun,et al. Three-stage, three-category, three-dimensional characterization and evaluation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and geological carbon storage[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2025,44(1):64-73 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230498
Citation: WANG Zeyu,OU Chenghua,XIAO Furun,et al. Three-stage, three-category, three-dimensional characterization and evaluation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and geological carbon storage[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2025,44(1):64-73 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230498

Three-stage, three-category, three-dimensional characterization and evaluation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and geological carbon storage

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20230498
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    E-mail:3528189968@qq.com

  • Corresponding author: E-mail:cho-mm@163.com
  • Received Date: 28 Aug 2023
  • Accepted Date: 01 Feb 2024
  • Rev Recd Date: 17 Jan 2024
  • Available Online: 18 Feb 2025
  • Objective

    This study aims to propose a novel three-stage, three-category, three-dimensional characterization and evaluation method for CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and geological carbon storage (GCS).

    Methods

    This method assesses the suitability, oil recovery, and storage capacity of these projects while addressing the distinct phase differences in the mechanisms of CO2 EOR and GCS during the later stages of reservoir development. This method involves the classification of CO2 EOR and GCS suitability into three stages: 1) physical storage suitability classification based on the five-factor method; 2) physicochemical storage suitability classification based on the six-factor method; and 3) chemical storage suitability classification based on the six-factor method. Additionally, this method provides a three-dimensional characterization and evaluation of CO2 EOR and GCS. It includes a visualization-based classification and assessment of the CO2 oil recovery amount and storage capacity using the storage coefficient method. The proposed evaluation framework has been applied to a representative low-porosity and ultralow-permeability reservoir in eastern China.

    Results

    The calculated CO2 oil recovery and storage capacity for the sample area are 648.24 tons and 2956.84 tons, respectively. These results highlight the spatial distribution characteristics of CO2 EOR and GCS at each stage and type. Ultimately, this three-stage, three-category, three-dimensional characterization and evaluation method offers vital technical support for refining CCUS projects and provides meaningful insights for subsequent operations.

    Conclusion

    The findings contribute to the scientific and rational planning and implementation of CO2 EOR and GCS projects, facilitating the sustainable development of oil and gas fields and enhancing resource utilization efficiency.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    徐红. 实现智能化油气开采降低石油对外依存度[J]. 中国高新科技,2023,29(7):10-11.

    XU H. Realizing intelligent oil and gas exploitation to reduce oil dependence[J]. China High and New Technology,2023,29(7):10-11. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [2]
    夏翠梅,王楠,刘景昱,等. “碳中和” 目标下海洋黑碳的源汇过程及其意义[J]. 地质科技通报,2024,43(2):318-329.

    XIA C M,WANG N,LIU J Y,et al. Source-sink processes of marine black carbon in the context of “carbon neutrality”[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2024,43(2):318-329. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [3]
    WANG Q,PFEIFFER H,AMAL R,et al. Introduction to CO2 capture,utilization and storage (CCUS)[J]. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering,2022,7(3):487-489.
    [4]
    DEZERN A E. Relevant metrics:How significant CCUS truly is?[J]. Blood,2021,138(11):918-919.
    [5]
    FØYEN T,ALCORN Z P,FERNØ M A,et al. CO2 mobility reduction using foam stabilized by CO2- and water-soluble surfactants[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,196:107651. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107651
    [6]
    TAKHT RAVANCHI M,SAHEBDELFAR S. Catalytic conversions of CO2 to help mitigate climate change:Recent process developments[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2021,145:172-194. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.003
    [7]
    牛皓,杜琼,许川东,等. 美国二氧化碳强化采油应用情况及对中国CCUS应用的启示[J]. 环境影响评价,2023,45(3):50-55.

    NIU H,DU Q,XU C D,et al. Application of carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery in USA and enlightenment of CCUS application to China[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2023,45(3):50-55. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [8]
    BAJPAI S,SHREYASH N,SINGH S,et al. Opportunities,challenges and the way ahead for carbon capture,utilization and sequestration (CCUS) by the hydrocarbon industry:Towards a sustainable future[J]. Energy Reports,2022,8:15595-15616. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.023
    [9]
    ZHANG K,LAU H C,CHEN Z X. Extension of CO2 storage life in the Sleipner CCS project by reservoir pressure management[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2022,108:104814.
    [10]
    STORK A L,VERDON J P,KENDALL J M. The microseismic response at the in Salah carbon capture and storage (CCS) site[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2015,32:159-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.11.014
    [11]
    周银邦,王锐,赵淑霞,等. CO2封存过程中“适应性” 地质建模方法及案例[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(6):1-8.

    ZHOU Y B,WANG R,ZHAO S X,et al. “Fit to purpose” geological modeling methods and cases in the process of CO2 storage[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(6):1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [12]
    HUMBUL S,RIZWAN N. CCUS:The Road to Net-Zero[J]. Energies,2023,16:4260. doi: 10.3390/en16114260
    [13]
    HANS B,PIETER S. Offshore pipeline design for CCUS[J]. Pipeline & Gas Journal,2023,250(4):1-10.
    [14]
    FORS. Capturing the potential of CCUS[J]. World Oil,2022,243(3):47-49.
    [15]
    郑长远,雷宏武,崔银祥,等. 西宁盆地南部天然CO2泄漏和浅部含水层响应[J]. 地质科技通报,2023,42(6):223-232.

    ZHEN C Y,LEI H W,CUI Y X,et al. Natural CO2 leakage and responses of shallow aquifers in the southern Xining Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2023,42(6):223-232. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [16]
    EIDE L I,BATUM M,DIXON T,et al. Enabling large-scale carbon capture,utilisation,and storage (CCUS) using offshore carbon dioxide (CO2) infrastructure developments:A review[J]. Energies,2019,12(10):1945. doi: 10.3390/en12101945
    [17]
    RECIOUI B,SETTOU N,KHALFI A,et al. Valorization of carbon dioxide by conversion into fuel using renewable energy in Algeria[J]. Transportation Research Part D(Transport and Environment),2016,43:145-157.
    [18]
    MALCOVATI L. IS09 - CCUS:Clinical perspective (high-risk CCUS)[J]. Leukemia Research,2023,128:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107087
    [19]
    杨国栋,李义连,马鑫,等. 超临界CO2增强热卤水开采模型研究[J]. 地质科技情报,2014,33(6):233-240.

    YANG G D,LI Y L,MA X,et al. Modeling study of enhanced thermal brine extraction using supercritical CO2[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(6):233-240. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [20]
    CAI M Y, LI X C, ZHANG K F, et al. Coupled hydro-mechanical-chemical simulation of CCUS-EOR with static and dynamic microscale effects in tight reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2024, 357: 129888.

    CAI M Y,LI X C,ZHANG K F,et al. Coupled hydro-mechanical-chemical simulation of CCUS-EOR with static and dynamic microscale effects in tight reservoirs[J]. Fuel,2024,357:129888.
    [21]
    张传宝,张东,李春光,等. CCUS驱油与封存的建模与优化研究[J]. 山东化工,2023,52(9):45-47.

    ZHANG C B,ZHANG D,LI C G,et al. Modeling and optimization of CCUS oil flooding and storage[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry,2023,52(9):45-47. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [22]
    唐浩瑞. JS油田低效水平井注CO2吞吐适宜度及增油效果评价研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2019.

    TANG H R. Evaluation of CO2 throughput suitability and oil increase effect of low-efficiency horizontal wells in JS oilfield [D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2019. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [23]
    莫绍星,李瀛,龙星皎,等. 咸水层CO2矿物封存数值模拟研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报,2013,32(6):150-158.

    MO S X,LI Y,LONG X J,et al. Development of numerical simulation for CO2 mineral sequestration[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2013,32(6):150-158. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [24]
    孟新. 中国CCUS-EOR项目经济效果及其提升手段研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2023,30(2):181-186.

    MENG X. Research on economic effect of China’s CCUS-EOR projects and its improvement methods[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(2):181-186. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [25]
    武守亚,杨建平,赵东亚,等. 基于侵入水影响的二氧化碳埋存量计算方法[J]. 石油工程建设,2016,42(4):18-22.

    WU S Y,YANG J P,ZHAO D Y,et al. Calculation method of carbon dioxide sequestration amount in consideration of aquifer influx[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction,2016,42(4):18-22. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [26]
    沈平平,廖新维,刘庆杰. 二氧化碳在油藏中埋存量计算方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2009,36(2):216-220. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.02.012

    SHEN P P,LIAO X W,LIU Q J. Methodology for estimation of CO2 storage capacity in reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(2):216-220. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.02.012
    [27]
    中国石油天然气总公司. 中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准油气储层评价方法[S]. 北京:中国石油天然气总公司,1997.

    China National Petroleum Corporation. People's Republic of China Oil and Gas Industry standard oil and gas reservoir evaluation method [S]. Beijing:PetroChina,1997. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(72) PDF Downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return